Opinion

BROWN v. BICKELL

Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 26, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.9%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KENNETH BROWN, :

Petitioner, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-CV-3424

:

BICKELL, et al., :

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2022, upon consideration of Petitioner Kenneth

Brown’s Motion for Relief from Order of June 15, 2015 (ECF No. 18), seeking relief under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b), it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The Motion is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without

prejudice to Brown’s right to file an application with the United States Court of Appeals for the

Third Circuit for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. §

2244(b)(3)(A).

2. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) because

no reasonable jurists would disagree with this Court’s procedural rulings or its disposition of

Brown's claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez

___________________________

JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, C. J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.