Case law

Nixon v. Lloyd

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 2025

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed under § 1915(e)(2)(B). … See Lillard v. Shelby Cty. Bd.

Echoles

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2026

Plaintiff sues the City of Akron; the Summit County Children Services Board (“CSB”); CSB Case Worker Savannah Weinhart and Supervisor Kim Wilcox; “Jane and John Doe” CSB Workers and Akron Police Officers; and Unknown Supervisory … See Erwin v. Edwards, 22 F. App’x 579 (6th Cir. 2001).

Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.

707 F. Supp. 2d 737 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 2010

Co. v. … that have applied an across-the-board reduction to account for these deficiencies.

Sobolewski v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 26, 2024

Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); Payne v. Secretary of Treasury, 73 F. App'x 836, 837 (6th Cir. 2003); Wells v. … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (recognizing that liberal construction for pro se litigants does not “abrogate basic pleading essentials”).

Lott

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 19, 2026

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007). … Nakia Bohanon v. Vantell, No. 1:22-cv-01161-SHM-tmp, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76332, at *5-6 (W.D. Tenn. Apr. 22, 2025) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); Northcott v. Plunkett, 42 F.

Lorens v. Catholic Health Care Partners

356 F. Supp. 2d 828 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 13, 2005

E.g., McLaughlin v. … Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74, 79 , 58 S.Ct. 98, 100 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937). See also Rector, Christ Church v.

Drake v. Richerson

948 F. Supp. 2d 817 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 31, 2013

In Lewis v. … See Moon v.

Kemp v. Biden

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 7, 2024

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … Doremus v. Board of Ed. of Hawthorne, 342 U.S. 429, 434 (1952). It is not sufficient to allege merely that he suffers in some indefinite way in common with the population in general. Id.

Cox v. Bank of America

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 27, 2025

See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93–94 (2007) (per curiam); accord Streater v. Cox, 336 F. App’x 470, 474 (6th Cir. 2009). … Ohio 2019) (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)), and the Court need not “conjure allegations” on her behalf, Erwin, 22 F. App’x at 580. II.

Penthouse International, Ltd. v. Putka

436 F. Supp. 1220 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 23, 1977

Lovell v. … See also Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, supra; Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 , 83 S.Ct. 631 , 9 L.Ed.2d 584 (1963); Kingsley Books v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957).

Fellinger v. United States

238 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 2, 1964

Owen Company v. … See Gooding Amusement Co. v.

Doe 1 v. Gupta

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 2023

BACKGROUND Manish previously was a board-certified plastic surgeon and owner of Artisan Surgery Center, LLC. … State v. White, 118 N.E.3d 410, 428-29 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). See also State v. Brown, 134 N.E.3d 783, 798 (Ohio Ct.

Izquierdo

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 6, 2026

See Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Magaw, 132 F.3d 272, 279-80 (6th Cir. 1997); see also Kitchen v. … Ohio Apr. 21, 2020) (dismissing for lack of standing when school board’s alleged injury was a potential future lawsuit because “such a suit is purely conjectural and is not sufficiently concrete to confer federal jurisdiction

St. Thomas v. State of Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 2, 2024

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 104 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath.

Secretary of U.S. Department of Labor v. Kavalec

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 4, 2020

Co. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 512 F.3d 800, 805 (6th Cir. 2008). However, “a party does not have an absolute right to implead.” U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. … Laurent v. Diltz, No. 3:17-cv-343, 2018 WL 5722715, at *5 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2018), report and recommendation adopted, 2018 WL 6046859 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2018); see also Galvan v.

Jacobs v. May

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 28, 2023

Ohio May 20, 1997) (Mahoning); Jacobs v. Morgan, 1:01-cv- 02224-PAG (N.D. Ohio Aug. 8, 2003) (Mahoning); Jacobs v. Morgan, 1:04-cv-02488-KMO (N.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2005) (Mahoning); Jacobs v. … His attempt to characterize the Ohio Parole Board’s decisions as “resentencings” will not relieve him of the bar against filing second or successive petitions.

The Crossroads Group, LLC, et al. v. City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 29, 2026

Kirilenko-Ison v. Board of Educ. of Danville Indep. Schs., 974 F.3d 652, 660 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. … Massachusetts v. United States, 435 U.S. 444, 463 n.19 (1978). Because the user pays for a benefit received, user fees are not a taking under the Fifth Amendment. Koontz, 570 U.S. at 615 (quoting Brown v.

Quinones

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 19, 2025

United States v. Mack, 298 F.R.D. 349, 350–51 (N.D. Ohio 2014) (quoting Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 n.4 (1984)). … Co. v. Mendelsohn, 552 U.S. 388, 388 (2008)).

Lesher v. Lavrich

632 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 1984

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Silverton v. Department of Treasury, 644 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir.1981).

Young v. Mulvaine

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 15, 2022

Daniel v. DTE Energy Co., 592 Fed. App’x. 489, 490 (6th Cir. 2015) (quoting Crehore v. United States, 253 F. App’x 547, 549 (6th Cir. 2007)). … The first exhibit merely shows the results of a warden’s administrative review which affirm the disciplinary decision of the Rules Infraction Board. (Doc. 93-2). This document does not include any form of grievance.