Case law

Salem Medical Arts & Development Corp. v. Columbiana County Board of Revision

80 Ohio St. 3d 621 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1998

We disagree. *623 In Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Salem’s contention ignores the dual status of a board of revision in an appeal to the BTA, where the board is both the deciding tribunal whose decision is being appealed and the party appellee. R.R.Z. Assoc, v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hall

131 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2012

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hall, 131 Ohio St.3d 222, 2012-Ohio-783.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HALL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hall, 131 Ohio St.3d 222, 2012-Ohio-783.] … Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Cincinnati Action for Hous. Now v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

164 Ohio St. 3d 509 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2021

Minus v. Brown, 30 Ohio St.2d 75, 81, 283 N.E.2d 131 (1972). … Williams v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 13, 19 [368 N.E.2d 838]; State ex rel. Commrs. of the Sinking Fund v. Brown (1957), 167 Ohio St. 71 [146 N.E.2d 287].”

In re DeBord

125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

Upon reapplication, Andrew Evans DeBord shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, he shall be admitted to the practice of law' in Ohio. … Respondent’s motion to maintain board papers under seal and to seal the Supreme Court file is denied. Brown, C.J., not participating.

Streetsboro Education Ass'n v. Streetsboro City School District Board of Education

68 Ohio St. 3d 288 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1994

Rollins v. Cleveland Hts.-University Hts. … Assn. v. Cuyahoga Falls City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 193 , 574 N.E.2d 442 , paragraph two of the syllabus; Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Rollman & Sons Co. v. Board of Revision

163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1955

Keith Columbus Co. v. Board of Revision, 148 Ohio St., 253 , 74 N. E. (2d), 359. There is no dispute that this building is used for department-store purposes. … It was held in First National Bank of Greeley v.

State Ex Rel. Lohn v. Medina County Board of Commissioners

124 Ohio St. 3d 241 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2009

Lohn v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 124 Ohio St.3d 241, 2009-Ohio- 6851.] THE STATE EX REL. LOHN v. MEDINA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ET AL. … Ray v.

State ex rel. Portage County Welfare Dept. v. Summers

38 Ohio St. 2d 144 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 8, 1974

BrowN, J. The question presented in this case is whether a “certified organization,” as defined in E. … Brown, JJ., concur. Hekbeht and Steen, JJ., concur in paragraphs one, two and four of the syllabus and in the judgment. R.

In re Ziegler

125 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2010

Upon reapplication, Philip Alonzo Ziegler shall undergo review by the board, and upon a recommendation of approval by the board, he shall be admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. … Respondent’s motion to maintain board papers under seal and to seal the Supreme Court file is denied. Brown, C.J., not participating.

State ex rel. Bassman v. Earhart

18 Ohio St. 3d 182 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1985

Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6, 7 [ 15 O.O.3d 3 ]; State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 , certiorari denied (1983),_U.S._, 78 L. Ed. 2d 723 ; State, ex rel. Bd. of Commrs., v. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.

Giant Tiger Drugs, Inc. v. Kosydar

43 Ohio St. 2d 103 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1975

Foster, v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. R. C. 5739.01 (P) was enacted in the form here quoted and became effective December 1, 1967. R. C. 5739.01 (P) was then amended November 21, 1973.

In re Carr-Williams

63 Ohio St. 3d 752 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1992

We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, Carr-Williams’ application is disapproved, and she may reapply pursuant to the conditions stated by the board. Order accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Union Camp Corp. v. Whitman

54 Ohio St. 2d 159 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1978

As in State v. Collins, supra, there is no doubt that the board’s denial of a hearing de novo in the present cause was an “order affecting a substantial right.” … Brown, P. Broavn and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., concurs in the judgment. O’Neill, C. J., and HeebeRT, J., dissent.

State Ex Rel. Schweinhagen v. Underhill

141 Ohio St. 128 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1943

Automobile Machine Co., v. Brown, Secy, of State, 121 Ohio St., 73 , 166 N. … Industrial Commission v. Brown, 92 Ohio St., 309 , 311, 110 N. E., 744 , 745 (L. R. A. 1916B, 1277). See, also, 36 Cyc., 1140, and 25 Ruling Case Law, 1043, and cases cited.”

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Hart

15 Ohio St. 2d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1968

This court in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Bilinski (1964), 177 Ohio St. 43 , 201 N. E. 2d 878 , and Dayton Bar Assn. v. Prear (1964), 175 Ohio St. 543 , 196 N. … The objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, and the recommendation of the board is confirmed. Report confirmed and judgment accordingly. Taft, C.

Board of Education of the South-Western City Schools v. Kinney

24 Ohio St. 3d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1986

As a general rule, this court will not consider matters which were not presented to the Board of Tax Appeals. Neil House Hotel Co. v. … Brown, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. In S.S. Kresge Co. v. Bowers (1960), 170 Ohio St. 405 [ 11 O.O.2d 157 ], the court held that the constitutional issue could be raised, for the first time, in this court.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

64 Ohio St. 3d 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1992

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent. … Brown, J., dissents. Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

In re Adoption of Schoeppner

46 Ohio St. 2d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1976

Thus, although the fact of imprisonment might, when combined with other factors, lend support to a finding of a wilful failure to support, Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Staat (1970), 287. Minn. 501, 178 N. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Jennewine v. Puffenberger

2025 Ohio 3041 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 2025

Calvaruso v. Brown, 2014-Ohio- 1018, ¶ 33. A de jure officer, by comparison, “is one who occupies his office through a proper and legal election or appointment and during a constituted term.” State ex rel. Witten v. … But it does not follow from Brown that a writ of mandamus may be issued in this case to compel Judge Puffenberger to make an appointment to the board of township trustees, because although R.C. 503.24 sets forth a legal duty

Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

144 Ohio St. 3d 549 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 25, 2015

SLIP OPINION NO. 2015-OHIO-4837 COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … This principle has been applied to board-of-revision proceedings that come before this court on appeal from the BTA. See LTC Properties, Inc. v. Licking Cty.