Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer

64 Ohio St. 3d 32
591 N.E.2d 1209
1992 Ohio LEXIS 1339

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 17, 1992
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Reprimand, Resnick, Sanction, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 2 cases
Authority: More cited than 75.4%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

*35 Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.

Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.