Opinion

In re Carr-Williams

  • 63 Ohio St. 3d 752
  • 591 N.E.2d 693
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1321
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 10, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 70.8%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s finding that Gail P. Carr-Williams has not established her present eligibility for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, Carr-Williams’ application is disapproved, and she may reapply pursuant to the conditions stated by the board.

Order accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.