Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.41s
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Shabazz
1994 Ohio 238 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1994
Tavenner v. Indian Lake Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 88, 578 N.E.2d 464, and State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21, 531 N.E.2d 1297. … 1988 decision in Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublished129 Ohio St. 3d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 2011
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-V-1565. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT 1. … Brown at ¶ 14.
Cited 6 timesPublished54 Ohio St. 2d 488 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1978
. *490 Lehman, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11 . Defendants-appellants in Board v. Walter filed their application for stay in the Conrt of Common Pleas pursuant to Civ. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
Cited 33 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Merion v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
142 Ohio St. 628 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1944
Bentz prosecuted an appeal to the Board of Eeview, and was eventually successful. … In support of the position taken herein as to the applicability of the Unemployment Compensation Act, see Carroll v. Social Security Board (C. C. A. 7), 128 F. (2d), 876; In re Kinney, 257 App. Div., 496 , 14 N. Y.
Cited 3 timesPublished61 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980
.***” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81 . … Brown, Victor, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Victor, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAERC Saw Mill Village, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of Revision
127 Ohio St. 3d 44 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2010
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2007-A-764 and 2008-A-157. __________________ BROWN, C.J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA … The school board regards Cleveland Mun. School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 14 timesPublished62 Ohio St. 2d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1980
Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), DR 7-102(A)(5 … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublishedColumbus Bar Ass'n v. Gloeckner
1 Ohio St. 3d 83 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1982
See, e.g., Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Fatica (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 40 [57 O.O. 2d 158]. After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusion of the board. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Respondent directs our attention to Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Weisenberger (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 1 [22 O.O. 3d 34]; Bar Assn. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Maurer v. Franklin County Board of Elections
33 Ohio St. 3d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1987
See Stern v. Bd. of Elections (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 175, 180 , 43 O.O. 2d 286, 289, 237 N.E. 2d 313, 317 . … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.
Cited 7 timesPublishedEast Cleveland Post No. 1500 v. Board of Tax Appeals
139 Ohio St. 554 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1942
However, the Board of Tax Appeals was confronted with the foregoing constitutional and statutory restrictions relating to a use exclusively for charitable purposes. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reasonable and lawful (Section 5611-2, General Code) and is therefore affirmed. Decision affirmed. Weygandt, C.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLake County Bar Ass'n v. Baxter
4 Ohio St. 3d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1983
of the board. … Brown, Sweeney, Weber, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Weber, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. Luckey v. Etheridge
62 Ohio St. 3d 404 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1992
Brennan, v. Vinton Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. . The portion of R.C. 3319.02 construed in Brennan, supra, now appears in R.C. 3319.02(C), with a minor amendment not relevant here.
Cited 13 timesPublishedGeneral Mills Fun Group, Inc. v. Lindley
1 Ohio St. 3d 27 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1982
This court has, however, consistently held the board’s determinations on issues of fact will not be disturbed absent a showing of patent abuse of discretion. See, e.g., Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, being neither unreasonable nor unlawful, is therefore affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished60 Ohio St. 3d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991
Brown, J. … In its arguments to this court, the board contends that Arlen v. Ohio State Medical Bd. (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 168 , 15 O.O. 3d 190, 399 N.E. 2d 1251 , is dispositive.
Cited 38 timesPublishedState ex rel. Lewis v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
74 Ohio St. 3d 1201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1995
Cited 7 timesPublishedWoda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of Revision
121 Ohio St. 3d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 2009
typically has discretion to hear additional evidence or to decline to do so, as the board deems appropriate. … Co. of Ohio v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedState ex rel. Tye v. Public Employees Retirement Board
55 Ohio St. 2d 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1978
C. 4003-1, authorized the employment of faculty members during relator’s tenure at the university and established the university, through its board of directors, as his employer. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Krewson v. Public Employees Retirement Board
31 Ohio Law Rep. 10 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1965
The employer and employee must each make the prescribed contributions to the appropriate funds administered by the Public Employees Retirement Board as trustee. Writ allowed accordingly. Taft, C. … J., Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRegal Realty Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision
169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 289 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1959
It does not appear from an examination of the records that the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are against the manifest weight of the evidence or are otherwise unlawful or unreasonable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of County Commrs. v. Austin
158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 476 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1953
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna