Opinion

Regal Realty Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 289

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 3, 1959
Status: Published
On the bench: Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Only, Peck, Respect, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from an examination of the records that the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are against the manifest weight of the evidence or are otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The decisions are, therefore, affirmed.

Decisions affirmed.

Weygandt, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Taet, J., concurs only in judgment with respect to case No. 85950.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.