disciplining an attorney who engaged in serious fraudulent transactions by use of checking accounts in a pattern commonly known as “check kiting,” with no mention of corresponding criminal charges
How later courts described this case
- disciplining an attorney who engaged in serious fraudulent transactions by use of checking accounts in a pattern commonly known as “check kiting,” with no mention of corresponding criminal charges
- imposing indefinite suspension on attorney involved in a check-kiting scheme when $16,000 in restitution remained unpaid
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Per Curiam.
Upon a review of all of the facts and circumstances as presented to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, this court finds that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and (6), and concurs with the recommendation of the board.
It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Weber, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
Weber, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.