Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,737 results
1.01s
LITTLE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 4, 2023
Ashcroft v. … Rouse v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown796 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 24, 1992
He also had on a sleeveless yellow undershirt with brown trim, a pair of black socks and suede shoes. … Wilson was dressed in a blue and white striped sweater, a blue belt, peach pants, a brown stocking cap and tan checked hat with a small front brim. He also wore a brown bodysuit and black, heeled shoes.
Cited 4 timesPublishedKAMINSKI-MINTZ v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 29, 2024
Conboy v. … Napier v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCHERRY HILL TOWNE CENTER PARTNERS, LLC v. GS PARK RACING, L.P.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 15, 2020
No. 18-12868 (RMB/KMW) v. … Partners, LLC v. GS Park Racing, L.P., 2019 WL 4187836 (D.N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDOE v. WALGREEN NATIONAL CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 31, 2022
Brown v. Joel Tanis & Sons, Inc., Civ. A. No. 13- 02984, 2014 WL 2705262, at *4 (D.N.J. June 13, 2014) (citing Kwaiatkowsky v. Merrill Lynch, A2270-06T1, 2008 WL 3875417, at *17 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. … Compare Brown, 2014 WL 2705262, at *4 (holding a plaintiff’s NJLAD claims for hostile work environment and retaliation are not duplicative of his common law IIED claim), with Calkins v. Dollarland, Inc., 117 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown132 F. 321 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 3, 1904
There were but two, the mate and the cook, on board when she was removed. The master, who is also the owner of the vessel and the libelant in this case, resided in New York City. … Applying to this case the rule followed in Cokeley v. The Snap (D. C.) 24 Fed. 504 , Hastorf v. The Governor (D. C.) 77 Fed. 1000 , and Phoenix Towing Co. v. City of New York (D.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTracy Towing Line, Inc. v. City of Jersey City
105 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 16, 1952
Following the mooring, the tug’s captain and crew went ashore about 6:00 a. m. with the exception of one Borges, a fireman, who was left on board as a watchman. 10. … See Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co. v. Olympic Forest Prod. Co., D.C.W.D.Wash.N.D.1937, 21 F.Supp. 940 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 4, 2026
Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 660 (3d Cir. 2019). … Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293, 312 (2006); see also Three Keys Ltd. v. SR Util. Holding Co., 540 F.3d 220, 226-27 (3d Cir. 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDNA Plant Technology Corp. v. Navigators Insurance
941 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 4, 1996
Flight 844 proceeded to Taipei, Japan where it landed and a portion of the cargo was placed on board United Flight 828. Flight 844 then proceeded directly to San Francisco. … B & S Associates, Inc. v. Indemnity Casualty and Property, Ltd., 641 So.2d 436 (Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1994).
Cited 1 timesPublishedAGNITA HOIST v. ATHENA BITCOIN ATM
District Court, D. New Jersey · May 2, 2024
Later that day, Plaintiff received another call from someone identifying themselves as Eric Brown (“Brown”), an employee of the U.S. Department of Treasury. Ud.) … Plaintiff did not believe Brown’s threats, hung up on him, and ignored his follow up call. (/d.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn re Industrial Office Bldg. Corp.
108 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 17, 1952
V. … Landis v. Western Pacific R. Co., 133 Pa. 579 , 19 A. 556, 558 ; see also Keane v. Moffly, 217 Pa. 240 , 66 A. 319, 320 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedLANGLEY v. UNITED AIRLINES INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 28, 2024
Pryor, 288 F.3d at 569 (quoting Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001)). The plaintiff must also plead that “but for race,” he would “not have suffered the loss of a legally protected right.” … See Alexander v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCharles v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
976 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 5, 1997
MEMORANDUM OPINION BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the application of class counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. … See Prandini v. National Tea Co., 557 F.2d 1015, 1020 (3d Cir.1977).
Cited 13 timesPublished561 F. Supp. 787 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 21, 1983
The Supreme Court later explained in Pure Oil Co. v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Wilshire Oil Co. of Texas, 523 F.2d 125, 132 (10th Cir.1975); Eastland Construction Co. v. Keasbey and Mattison Co., 358 F.2d 777, 780 (9th Cir.1966); Adams Dairy Company v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNapier v. Veterans' Administration
187 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 11, 1960
In this case, as in Mitchell v. … See 38 U.S.C. §§ 211 (a) and 4004; Magnus v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedKAPLAN v. SAINT PETER'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 17, 2023
action by Saint Peter’s or its board. … V, § 1; id. art. HI, § 2.) The Bishop also appoints the Chair and the board members that serve on the Committee. (Bylaws art. III, § 2.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownSEIBERT v. NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 8, 2023
against Defendants Nokia of America Corporation (“Nokia”), the Board of Directors of Nokia (the “Board”), and the Nokia 401(k) Committee (the “Committee”) (together “Defendants”).1 (D.E. … Aug. 23, 2022); Johnson v. PNC Fin. Servs. Grp., Inc., No. 20-01493, 2022 WL 973581, at *6 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022); Rodriguez, 2022 WL 16648825, at *11; Brown v. MITRE Corp., No. 22-10976, 2023 WL 2383772, at *5 (D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEVANGELISTA v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN
District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 22, 2024
Brown, Esq. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLocal 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campbell Soup Co.
954 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 25, 1997
Ramsay, Henry Arkema, Jr., Donald Brown, Ivan F. Mather, and William Wise, Sr. … Corp. v. Shalala, 1 F.3d 1261 (D.C.Cir.1993). 7 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedSecurities & Exchange Commission v. Pasternak
561 F. Supp. 2d 459 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 24, 2008
V. … .”); Banca Cremi, S.A. v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc., 132 F.3d 1017, 1033 (4th Cir.1997) (" ‘A securities broker's mark-up equals the price charged to the customer minus the prevailing market price.’”
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna