Opinion

SIMPSON

Court
District Court, D. New Jersey
Filed
Feb 4, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 39.1%

The opinion

[Docket Nos. 1, 3]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

CAMDEN VICINAGE

EUGENE T. SIMPSON II, :

: CIV. NO. 25-13349 (RMB-EAP)

Plaintiff :

:

v. : MEMORANDUM ORDER

:

ADRIENNE ADELE SIMPSON, :

:

Defendant :

____________________________________

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the filing of an application to proceed

in forma pauperis (“IFP”), [Docket No. 1-1], and a Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel,

[Docket No. 3], by pro se Plaintiff Eugene T. Simpson II (“Plaintiff”). For the reasons set forth

below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice due to a lack of subject

matter jurisdiction.

Plaintiff, a convicted and sentenced state prisoner confined in South Woods State

Prison in Bridgeton, New Jersey, filed this pro se probate matter without paying the $350 filing

fee and $55 administrative fee for a civil action and without submitting a properly completed

application to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) provides, in relevant part (emphasis added):

A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action . . . shall submit a

certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or

institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period

immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of

appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at

which the prisoner is or was confined.

Plaintiff’s trust account statement is not certified by the appropriate prison official and

is therefore incomplete. [Docket No. 1-2.]

Moreover, the Court “has the authority to dismiss a case ‘at any time,’ 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2), regardless of the status of a filing fee; that is, a court has the discretion to consider

the merits of a case and evaluate an IFP application in either order or even simultaneously.”

Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 660 (3d Cir. 2019). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Adrienne

Adele Simpson, Plaintiff’s sister and the executor of their father’s estate, “[h]as avoided all

attempts to [close out their] father’s estate” and distribute estate assets. [Docket No. 1

(“Compl.”) at 3-4.] Federal courts are precluded “from endeavoring to dispose of property

that is in the custody of a state probate court.” Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293, 312 (2006);

see also Three Keys Ltd. v. SR Util. Holding Co., 540 F.3d 220, 226-27 (3d Cir. 2008). As

adjudicating Plaintiff’s claims would require this Court to interfere with the administration of

an estate and the disposition of estate property, the Court concludes it lacks subject matter

jurisdiction. Id. Plaintiff may pursue any such claims in New Jersey Superior Court in

accordance with New Jersey law and any applicable statute of limitations. Therefore, for the

foregoing reasons,

IT IS on this 4th day of February, 2026,

1. ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint, [Docket No. 1], is DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further

2. ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket

No. 1-1], is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further

2

3. ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel, [Docket No.

3], is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further

4. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this action; and it is

further

5. ORDERED that if Plaintiff believes he can cure the jurisdictional defects

identified in this Order, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the

Court, Mitchell H. Cohen Building & U.S. Courthouse, 4th & Cooper Streets, Camden, NJ

08101, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; Plaintiff’s request to reopen this matter

shall include an amended Complaint establishing proper subject matter jurisdiction and either

(1) a properly completed IFP application including a certified copy of his inmate trust

account; or (2) the $405 filing fee. Upon timely receipt of the above, this Court will direct

the Clerk of the Court to reopen this matter; and it is finally

6. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon

Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.

s/Renée Marie Bumb

RENÉE MARIE BUMB

Chief United States District Judge

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.