Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,515 results
1.62s
District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jan 10, 2023
court must review the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … “Incarcerated people have a clearly established right to be free from physical harm inflicted by others in the institution.” Kemp v. Fulton Cty., 27 F.4th 491, 494 (7th Cir. 2022) (citing Farmer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown151 F. Supp. 2d 1015 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Aug 22, 2000
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) “qualifies as ‘clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.’ ” Terry Williams, 120 S.Ct. at 1512. … Additionally, it is clear that the Indiana Supreme Court has not decided this issue in a manner “contrary to ... clearly established Federal law.”
Cited 1 timesPublished117 F. Supp. 2d 788 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Oct 24, 2000
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) “qualifies as ‘clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.’ ” Terry Williams, 120 S.Ct. at 1512 . … Additionally, it is clear that the Indiana Supreme Court has not decided this issue in a manner “contrary to ... clearly established Federal law.”
Cited 3 timesPublishedWilliam Shecoby Palmer v. Petalas
District Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 17, 2021
Plaintiff also raises incoherent “sovereign citizen” arguments to support his Motion, for example alleging that the Defendants were required to prove that the Plaintiff was subject to an exception in the “Foreign Sovereign Immunities … May 26, 2021) (“Sovereign citizen claims are summarily rejected because it has been clearly established that the laws of the United States apply to all persons within its borders . . . .”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohnson v. Lafayette Fire Fighters' Ass'n Local 472
857 F. Supp. 1292 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jul 22, 1994
This effort — which has to this date fallen short — continued throughout the litigation, and was clearly in response to the litigation and to the exposure to liability. … It is also well established that this judge need not limit the hourly rates to the Lafayette ar^a. Judge Fairchild, in Chrapliwy v.
Cited 5 timesPublished754 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Dec 26, 1990
In this instance, the voluntariness of the statement was clearly established under the mandates of Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986). … With that procedural process established, the factual record must clearly support the imposition of the death penalty. The sentencing trial judge should not ignore the recommendation of the jury.
Cited 11 timesPublishedReeder-Baker v. Lincoln National Corp.
649 F. Supp. 647 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Dec 9, 1986
The preponderance of the evidence clearly establishes that the reason given by Lincoln for plaintiff’s “high competent” rating is merely a pretext. … This memo itself establishes a causal connection. Baker complained about Lincoln’s racial policies and was put on probation. The evidence clearly shows that there was no “apprehension” or “uncertainty” in the P.C.U.
Cited 25 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 4, 2020
court must review the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … Only “genuine emergencies” qualify as a basis for circumventing § 1915(g). Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 531 (7th Cir. 2002). Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · Apr 22, 2024
court must review the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … established or otherwise.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownJones v. State Wide Aluminum, Inc.
246 F. Supp. 2d 1018 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 20, 2003
Jones was covered by two ERISA qualified health plans, State Wide, 1 and Partners, an HMO, each of which decided the other was obligated to pay. … See King, 218 F.3d at 723 (citing prior case law for the well established conclusion that design decisions fall outside the purview of an administrator’s fiduciary duty); Ames, 170 F.3d at 757 (same).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Sebring Homes Corp.
879 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 20, 1994
Looking to the definition of manufacturer provided by the Act (“means any person”), the question narrows to whether the Ornatowskis may individually qualify as a “person” under the Act. … Thus, had the Ornatowskis acted in their personal capacities, as opposed to as officers and agents of Sebring Homes, they clearly would be liable as “persons” under the Act.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · Apr 14, 2022
. § 1915A, the court must screen the complaint and dismiss it if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such … “Some conditions of confinement may establish an Eighth Amendment violation in combination when each alone would not do so.” Gillis v. Litscher, 468 F.3d 488, 493 (7th Cir. 2006).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEvans v. U.S. Department of the Interior
135 F. Supp. 3d 799 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 28, 2015
Bremer’s declaration doesn’t establish a sufficient basis-/to support his inferences. … Because these introductory paragraphs qualify the entire declarations, Ms.
Cited 10 timesPublished909 F. Supp. 1169 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Nov 29, 1995
Holcomb, whom the court considered to be well qualified after eight and one-half years as a public defender, to handle the petitioner’s defense. … If Bennett establishes that certain errors of counsel were unreasonable, he must then show that the errors resulted in prejudice to his defense. Burr, 492 N.E.2d at 308 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · Jun 24, 2019
Creasy failed to recognize that the deadline for the filing of a petition for transfer was established by the Indiana Rules of Appellate Procedure, not by a court order. Mr. … While there are exceptions to Eleventh Amendment immunity, none are applicable here. See MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Ill.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohnson v. Westville Correctional Facility
District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 18, 2022
Prison officers enjoy tort immunity under the ITCA, except in precise circumstances. See Ind. Code § 34-13-3-5. … “The party seeking immunity bears the burden of establishing its conduct comes within the Act.” King v. Ne. Sec., Inc., 790 N.E.2d 474, 480 (Ind. 2003), reh’g denied. Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBiglands v. Raytheon Employee Savings & Investment Plan
801 F. Supp. 2d 781 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jul 12, 2011
Clearly, Biglands cannot avoid the arbitrary and capricious standard by pleading around it. … The Plan denied Big-lands’ claim on June 28, 2004 and never used any “if’ or “then” conditional qualifying language.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · May 24, 2021
the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206, 209-10 (1998) (explaining the ADA prohibits a “public entity” from discriminating against qualified individuals with a disability by excluding them from “services, programs, or activities of a public
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 12, 2022
§ 1915A, the court must screen the amended complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … Walker did not list Sergeant Beane in the section where he is asked to identify the defendants, but he clearly indicates that he is suing four defendants and includes specific allegations about Sergeant Beane violating
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna