Case law

Cheung v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

282 F. Supp. 3d 638 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 12, 2017

Young v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , 2017 WL 2774735 (D. Del. June 27, 2017). … Menowitz v. Brown , 991 F.2d 36 , 40 (2d Cir. 1993) (citation omitted).

Wilson v. IDOC

District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 25, 2022

Greeno v. Daley, 414 F.3d 645, 652–653 (7th Cir. 2005)(quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Accord Rodriguez v. … See Gayton v. McCoy, 593 F.3d 610, 620 (7th Cir. 2010). Accord Farmer v.

Miller v. Rauner

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 30, 2020

.”); Burks v. … Brown’s professional judgment regarding Plaintiff’s medical care because there was nothing in her report that made it obvious Plaintiff might not be receiving adequate care. Giles v.

Kitson v. Bank of Edwardsville

240 F.R.D. 610 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 16, 2006

Pimentel, 229 F.R.D. 201, 203 (D.N.M.2005); Lombard v. MCI Telecomms. Corp., 13 F.Supp.2d 621, 625 (N.D.Ohio 1998); Board of Educ. of Evanston Township High Sch. Dist. No. 202 v. … See United States v.

Contrera v. Langer

290 F. Supp. 3d 269 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 5, 2018

See , e.g. , Brown Media Corp. v. K & L Gates, LLP , 854 F.3d 150 , 156-57 (2d Cir. 2017). … Mar. 18, 2005) ; accord Mendez v.

Billips v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 6, 2024

Shields v. Ill. … See Owens v.

Andreozzi v. United States Army

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 9, 2025

Hadley v. … Because expunging the D&A Board records and restoring time credits would confer no benefit upon Andreozzi, the Court finds this case to be moot. Cf. Pope v.

Lyerla v. AMCO Insurance

461 F. Supp. 2d 834 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 2006

.”); Board of Educ. of Decatur Sch. Dist. No. 61 v. … Bova v. U.S.

Blackburn

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 24, 2026

Murphy, 844 F.3d at 655, 659 (citing Leetaru v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, 32 N.E.3d 583 (Ill. 2015)). … See LaBrec v. Walker, 948 F.3d 836, 841 (7th Cir. 2020): Isby v. Brown, 856 F.3d 508, 521 (7th Cir. 2017); King v. Kramer, 680 F.3d 1013, 1018 (7th Cir. 2012).

Brown

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 3, 2026

Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981) (“A public defender does not act under color of state law when performing a lawyer's traditional functions as counsel 1 State v. Brown, Case No. 2024-CF-122 (Jeff. Cnty. Cir. … Zimmerman v. Bornick, 25 F.4th 491, 494 (7th Cir. 2022) (amendment would be futile if plaintiff already had multiple chances to cure deficiencies); Always Towing & Recovery, Inc. v.

Flowers

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 7, 2026

Pavey v. … Crouch v. Brown, 27 F.4th 1315, 1320 (7th Cir. 2022) citing Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 642 (2016).

Sprague v. Jeffreys

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 9, 2022

See Kadamovas v. … applies the factors discussed in Pruitt v.

McGraw-Hill Global Educ. Holdings, LLC v. Mathrani

293 F. Supp. 3d 394 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 5, 2018

Brown Shoe Co. , 2009 WL 2496024 , at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 22, 2009). … Koehler v.

Bridges

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 28, 2026

The grievance was stamped “Received” by the Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) on May 23, 2023 (Doc. 1, p. 6; Doc. 39-1, pp. 38-39). … Conley, 663 F.3d 899, 903 (7th Cir. 2011); see also Crouch v. Brown, 27 F.4th 1315, 1320 (7th Cir. 2022).

Davenport

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Apr 17, 2026

See Pasiewicz v. Lake Cnty. Forest Preserve Dist., 270 F.3d 520, 526 (7th Cir. 2001). See also Courtney v. Butler, 66 F.4th 1043, 1052-53 (7th Cir. 2023) (citing Scott v. … Brown v. Budz, 904 F.3d 904, 918 (7th Cir. 2005); Shockley v. Jones, 823 F.2d 1068, 1070 (7th Cir. 1987).

Disney Enters., Inc. v. Sarelli

322 F. Supp. 3d 413 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 9, 2018

Sys. , 823 F.3d at 160 (quoting Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey , 717 F.3d 295 , 307 (2d Cir. 2013). … Kelly-Brown , 717 F.3d at 308 *431 (citations omitted). The purpose of the fair use defense is to "permit[ ] others to use a protected mark to describe aspects of their own goods." Merck & Co. v.

Hemphill v. Sayers

552 F. Supp. 685 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 2, 1982

Eleventh Amendment Defendants Sayers, Dempsey, and Schulz argue that at all relevant times, they were agents of the State of Illinois, and that Chapter V, Section D.ll, Indemnification Policy of the Policies of the Board … That the Eleventh Amendment does not bar this suit is underscored by the Court’s decision in Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1981).

We Shall Overcome Found. v. Richmond Org., Inc.

330 F. Supp. 3d 960 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 31, 2018

(quoting Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep't of Health and Human Resources , 532 U.S. 598 , 602-03 & n.4, 121 S.Ct. 1835 , 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001) ). … See Hensley v.

United States v. $128,915.00 in United States currency

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 4, 2022

United States v. Vargas, 552 F.3d 550, 557 (7th Cir. 2008). The Court finds evidence of Daniel Cook and Ronald Brown’s arrest is more prejudicial than probative in the instant case. … Hanson v. Dane Cnty., 608 F.3d 335, 339 (7th Cir. 2010) (citing Baxter v.

Abuharba v. Asselmeier

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 12, 2022

See Ledford v. Sullivan, 105 F.3d 354, 358-59 (7th Cir. 1997). … Plaintiff must establish that the greenish-brown build up on his teeth and receding gumlines were “objectively serious medical condition[s]” of which Defendants were aware and disregarded. Brown v.