Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,021 results
3.38s
District Court, E.D. California · Aug 27, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOM BROWN … See id.; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 28 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 4, 2024
Defendants 4 Presto and Brown conspired to plant drugs inside plaintiff’s legal mail. … to negatively affect plaintiff’s Board of Prisons “terms date” of January 2024. 8 (Id. at 7-8.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 10, 2024
Sandoval v. … Affs. v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 23 248, 253, (1981)3; see also Phipps v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 9, 2024
Alflex 16 Corp. v. … See Clausen v. M/V New Carissa, 339 F.3d 17 1049, 1064 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting Aceves v. Allstate Ins. Co., 18 68 F.3d 1160, 1167–68 (9th Cir. 1995)); see also Duran v. Stock 19 Bldg.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 8, 2024
See 19 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 19 Cir. 1982).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jul 26, 2023
, No. 2:21-cv-01045 DAD AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. … See e.g., U.S. v. Molen, 2012 WL 5940383, at *1 14 | (E.D.Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 27, 2022
DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 16 17 18 Plaintiff Lewis Dewane Brown … Bautista v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Apr 20, 2021
prejudice Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action for Unlawful Seizure and Fourth Cause of Action for 27 Municipal Liability Under Monell v. … § 1983 10 claim for unlawful seizure by Plaintiff NOAH BROWN against Defendants NATALIE RAFFERTY I and DOES 1-25 — is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 12 2.
Cited 0 timesUnknownShaw v. Governing Board of Modesto City School District
310 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 6, 1970
United States v. Fisher, 2 Cranch (U.S.) 358, 2 L.Ed. 304 (1804). And, as Mr. Justice Holmes put it in Roschen v. … See Briggs v. Kerrigan, 307 F.Supp. 295 (D.Mass.1969), for a more complete discussion of the operation of the National School Lunch Act. 2 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 17, 2020
Id. at 451 (citing Brown v. … Beck v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Mar 5, 2024
See 10 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 11 II. … Swarthout bars any challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence 15 to support the Board’s decision. See Roberts v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jan 28, 2020
BROWN, JR., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 … Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 20 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2019
Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and 7 Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076. On February 1, 2019, the Ninth Circuit 8 issued an order affirming the district court decision in Smith, et al. v. … Schwarzenegger, et al., 9 appeal no. 15-17155, and Hines v. Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and affirming in part and 10 reversing in part in Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Sep 4, 2019
BROWN, JR., et al., DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF 15 Defendants. … P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Aug 30, 2019
Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et 3 al., appeal no. 15-17076. (ECF No. 51.) … Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and affirming in part and reversing in part in 6 Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076. The stay of this matter was lifted on April 7 5, 2019.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnthoine v. North Central Counties Consortium
571 F. Supp. 2d 1173 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 3, 2008
Brown Deck, Exh. A. On April 7, 2005, Anthoine appealed Brown’s decision to the Board. Defs.’ UMF ¶ 42. … Marable v. Nitchman, 511 F.3d 924, 929 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , *1185 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedTumbling v. Merced Irrigation District
262 F.R.D. 509 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 13, 2009
See, e.g., Sallis v. … S Described as: “Investigation memorandum” regarding timecard fraud accusations, dated August 7, 2007, and prepared by Masson, Robbins Gnass & Browning for *520 the MID Board of Directors.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. California · Jun 18, 2025
Background 2 On February 21, 2025, plaintiff filed a civil complaint in Brown v. … This case be dismissed as duplicative of Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Dec 9, 2020
Boyde v. 11 Brown, 404 F.3d 1159, 1172 (9th Cir. 2005), as amended, 421 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2005). … Roe, 263 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 2001) (overruled on 13 other grounds by Payton v. Woodford, 346 F.3d 1204, 1217 n.18 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc), 14 overruled by Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · Oct 12, 2023
See 4 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 5 II. … Swarthout bars any challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence 10 to support the Board’s decision. See Roberts v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna