Opinion

Morgan v. Brown

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jan 28, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ERNEST MORGAN, Case No. 1:17-cv-00425-LJO-JLT

12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION

13 v. (Doc. 90)

14

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

17 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with

18 prejudice. (Doc. 90) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations

19 effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688,

20 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

23

Dated: January 27, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.