Opinion

Brown v. Rafferty

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Apr 20, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.6%

The opinion

1 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ., (SBN 69888)

2 K. CHIKE ODIWE, ESQ., (SBN 315109)

Airport Corporate Centre

3

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

4 Oakland, California 94621

Telephone: (510) 839-5200

5 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882

john.burris@johnburrislaw.com

6 chike.odiwe@johnburrislaw.com

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

NOAH BROWN, an individual, Case No. 2:19-cv-02180-TLN-CKD

12

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

13 Plaintiff,

DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

14   vs.  AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION

15

CITY OF RIO VISTA, a municipal

16

corporation; NATALIE RAFFERTY,

17 individually and in his official capacity as an

officer for the Rio Vista Police Department;

18 and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually and in

their official capacity as police officers for the

19

Rio Vista Police Department,

20

Defendants.

21

22

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

23

By and through their counsel of record in this action, Plaintiff NOAH BROWN (“Plaintiff”)

24

and Defendants CITY OF RIO VISTA and NATALIE RAFFERTY (“Defendants”) – the parties –

25

hereby stipulate for the purpose of jointly requesting that the Honorable Court dismiss with

26

prejudice Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action for Unlawful Seizure and Fourth Cause of Action for

27

Municipal Liability Under Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (“Monell”), as

1 follows:

2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT.

3 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an

4 action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have

5 appeared.

6 2. Defendants dispute Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action (42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for an

7 unlawful seizure).

8 3. Defendants dispute Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of Action (42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for

9 municipal liability pursuant to Monell).

10 4. In light of the foregoing and in the interests of justice, the parties hereby stipulate to

11 dismiss those portions of Plaintiff's claims as specified herein below.

12 STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL.

13 5. The parties hereby stipulate to, and respectfully request that the Court issue an

14 appropriate Order giving effect to, the following dismissal with prejudice to part of Plaintiff’s claims

15 in this action:

16 6. Plaintiff hereby stipulates to dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff’s First Cause of Action

17 in its entirety: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for an unlawful seizure by Plaintiff NOAH BROWN against

18 Defendants NATALIE RAFFERTY and DOES 1-25.

19 7. To that effect, the parties hereby stipulate to and jointly request that the Court enter

20 an Order striking the following language from the operative Complaint: the entirety of paragraphs

21 20-21.

22 8. Plaintiff hereby stipulates to dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff’s Fourth Cause of

23 Action in its entirety: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for municipal liability pursuant to Monell by Plaintiff

24 NOAH BROWN against Defendants CITY OF RIO VISTA and DOES 26-50.

25 9. To that effect, the parties hereby stipulate to and jointly request that the Court enter

26 an Order striking the following language from the operative Complaint: the entirety of paragraphs

27 38 through 45.

1 releases the aforementioned dismissed/stricken claim – including all claims for liability or damages

2 or otherwise by Plaintiff against any of the Defendants or their agents or employees – and waives

3 and releases all costs, court fees, and attorneys’ fees arising out of this litigation as to the

4 aforementioned dismissed claim. By and through Plaintiff’s attorneys of record in this action,

5 Plaintiff further affirms that Plaintiff is hereby knowingly, freely, voluntarily, and without duress

6 releasing and waiving these claims for damages or liability, and all associated causes of action,

7 which in any way arise from the incident at issue in this action.

8 11. This Stipulation may be signed in counterpart and a facsimile or electronic signature

9 shall be as valid as an original signature.

10 IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11

12 DATED: LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

13

14

By: Kenneth Chike Odiwe

15

John L. Burris

16 Kenneth Chike Odiwe

Attorneys for Plaintiff

17 NOAH BROWN

18

19

Dated:

20 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH

LLP

21

22 By: _/s/ John Robinson

JOHN ROBINSON

23 Attorney for Defendant

CITY OF RIO VISTA

24

25

26

27

1

Dated:

2 PORTER SCOTT ATTORNEYS

3 By:/s/_Suli Mastorakos______________________

CARL FESSENDEN

4

SULI MASTORAKOS

Attorney for Defendant

5

NATALIE RAFFERTY

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and pursuant to the Court’s

3 inherent and statutory authority, including but not limited to the Court’s authority under the

4 applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the United States District Court, Eastern District of

° California Local Rules; after due consideration of all of the relevant pleadings, papers, and records

6 in this action; and upon such other evidence or argument as was presented to the Court; Good Cause

appearing therefor, and in furtherance of the interests of justice:

8 ORDER REGARDING PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS.

? 1. The Court hereby Orders that Plaintiff's First Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

10 claim for unlawful seizure by Plaintiff NOAH BROWN against Defendants NATALIE RAFFERTY

I and DOES 1-25 — is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

12 2. To that effect, the Court hereby Orders that the following language is stricken from

3 the operative Complaint: the entirety of paragraphs 20 through 21.

3. The Court hereby Orders that Plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

1S claim for municipal liability pursuant to Monell by Plaintiff NOAH BROWN against Defendants

16 CITY OF RIO VISTA and DOES 26-50 — is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

4. To that effect, the Court hereby Orders that the following language is stricken from

I8 the operative Complaint: the entirety of paragraphs 38 through 45.

9 5. Furthermore, the Court acknowledges Plaintiffs stipulation to waive and release all

20 costs, court fees, and attorneys’ fees arising out of this litigation between these parties thereto as to

a1 the aforementioned dismissed claims and parties.

22

23

34 IT IS SO ORDERED. □□ f /)

25 “ / ) Lu

Dated: April 20, 2021 AWN a Z

26 Troy L. Nunley>

United States District Judge

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.