Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

3,916 results

1.42s

  • Irving Carlos Zuniga v. House Foods America Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 2022

    Except as otherwise provided in 4 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 5 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 6 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

    498 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 1980

    NORTHROP cannot establish injury in fact in its Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth causes of action. 1. … The ASPRs 3 clearly give the United States Government unlimited rights in the YF-17 data and technology.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Paul Martin v. Ontel Products Corporation

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 17, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 1 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 2 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If 12 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 13 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 14 appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Abraham Gamboa v. County of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · May 9, 2023

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 4 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 15 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 16 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 17 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Daniel Thomas v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 25 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 8 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 9 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10 2.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Geoff Winkler v. Joseph Fazio

    District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hugo Rivera v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only 5 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 6 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 7 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dan Raines v. Enrich Financial, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 19, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 19 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 20 prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Manuel Campa v. Walmart Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 2021

    Except as otherwise provided 11 in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery 12 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 13 designated before … If only a portion of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 21 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 22 A Party

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • IDC Logistics, Inc. v. Dile Solutions LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2023

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 26 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 1 (b)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brandon Cameron v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • John Kostikyan v. USAA Federal Savings Bank

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2023

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 21 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material on a 3 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 4 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Apr 5, 2021

    If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 14 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 24 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 25 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 26 margins

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • J.W. v. Jarad Higgins

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 21, 2020

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 22 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 23 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the 5 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 6 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 7 margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jose R. Perez v. General Information Services, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2020

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 17 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 18 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 3 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 4 without prior privilege review.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Courtney Whittier v. The University of Southern California

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 4 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 5 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 6 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • David Rudorfer v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2022

    If only a portion of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 25 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 26 A Party … If only a portion of the material on 8 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bobby Harris v. Nissan North America, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2021

    If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 1 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 11 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 12 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 13 in the margins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beachcomber Management Crystal Cove, LLC

    District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2023

    Except as otherwise provided in this 27 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 28 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 20 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 21

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LA Alliance for Human Rights v. City of Los Angeles

    District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2021

    Rather, “[e]ven when done in the exercise of a lawful power, public spending may qualify as waste if it is completely unnecessary or useless or provides no public benefit.” Chiatello v. … Thus, the County’s claims of immunity under 820.2 and 815.2 are inapplicable to the present California tort causes of action.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.