Case law

Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

689 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 1982

Fahey v. Mallonee, 332 U.S. 245, 253-54 , 67 S.Ct. 1552, 1554-56 , 91 L.Ed. 2030 (1947) (appointment of conservator for savings and loan by Bank Board under Home Owners’ Loan Act); Hodel v. … V.

William Jefferson & Co., Inc. v. Board of Assessment and Appeal

695 F.3d 960 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 29, 2012

County Board of Supervisors appoints members of the Board to serve “as the local board of equalization.” 10200 JEFFERSON & CO. v. … Audubon Soc. v.

Moore v. Board of Trustees of Yakima County Library

268 F. App'x 669 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 2008

See Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 415-16 , 122 S.Ct. 2179 , 153 L.Ed.2d 413 (2002); see also Lewis v. … Little v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Long Beach Youth Center, Inc., Long Beach Youth Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

591 F.2d 1276 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 17, 1979

B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9 , 82 S.Ct. 1099 , 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962); N. L. R. B. v. Robertson Industries, 560 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1976). … Whether a particular group is a labor organization is a question of fact, and the Board’s finding should be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. N. L. R. B. v.

Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

418 F.2d 203 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 10, 1969

Buckner Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 401 F.2d 910, 913 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1084 , 89 S. Ct. 868 , 21 L.Ed.2d 777 (1969). As stated by the Supreme Court in N.L.R.B. v. … Smith v. Evening News Assn., 371 U.S. 195, 197-198 , 83 S.Ct. 267 , 9 L.Ed.2d 246 (1962).” The petition for review is denied and it is ordered that the Board’s order of September 27, 1968 be enforced.

Lewis v. California Board of Prison Terms

264 F. App'x 647 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 18, 2008

In Case No. 05-56604, Lewis contends that the California Board of Prison Terms’ (the “Board”) decision finding him unsuitable for parole violated his due process rights because the Board relied upon inaccurate facts regarding … See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-56 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 , 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985). Although Lewis also contends that the Board improperly promulgated 15 Cal.

Harrig v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

6 F. App'x 645 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 2001

MEMORANDUM 2 Jo Ann Harrig petitions pro se for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (“RRB”) decision, affirming the hearing officer’s computation of her widow’s annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 … Calderon v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 780 F.2d 812, 813 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted). We have reviewed the record and the RRB’s decision and conclude that it is *646 supported by substantial evidence.

Abdullah Brown v. Richard Ives

543 F. App'x 636 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 22, 2013

Insofar as Brown is challenging the BOP’s individualized determination concerning his placement, the district court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition. See Reeb v. … Contrary to his claim, the BOP does not have a policy of categorically excluding from RRC placement prisoners who, like Brown, have more than six months left to serve on their sentences. See Sacora v.

General Motors Corp. v. California State Board of Equalization

824 F.2d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 1987

Co. v. Dedeaux, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1549 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987), does not alter the opinion’s analysis. … Co. v. Massachusetts, 471 U.S. 724 , 105 S.Ct. 2380 , 85 L.Ed.2d 728 (1985), remains fully applicable.

Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

754 F.2d 1381 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 31, 1984

Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 678, 683-84 , 64 S.Ct. 830, 832-33 , 88 L.Ed. 1007 (1944). … The rationale advanced by the Board was that the year during which a union is presumed to retain majority support in a bargaining unit, see Brooks v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.

134 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 8, 1943

International Association of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 72, 79-81 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed. 50 ; H. J. Heinz Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 514, 518-521 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms

239 F. App'x 372 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 24, 2007

See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). … Specifically, appellant’s constitutional challenges to the application of the California Determinate Sentencing Law to appellant’s parole proceedings are foreclosed by this court’s decision in Connor v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Services, Inc. And Associates

467 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 10, 1972

At this juncture, the Board favored the individual measures taken by the five men. Relying upon N. L. R. B. v. … V.

United States v. Clive Hollinshead, United States of America v. Johnnie Brown Fell

495 F.2d 1154 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 17, 1974

Brown, 9 Cir., 1972, 455 F.2d 1201, 1204 ; United States v. Haili, 9 Cir., 1971, 443 F.2d 1295, 1299 . The admission of witnesses Lujan’s expert testimony was also proper. … Cohen v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F.2d 751, 752 . Affirmed.

Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

467 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 1972

The Board’s decision “can fairly be said to effectuate the policies of the Act,” NLRB v. … NLRB v. Brown, & Root, 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir. 1963).

In Re Proceedings Before the Federal Grand Jury for the District of Nevada. United States of America v. Joseph Conforte and Sally Conforte

643 F.2d 641 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 23, 1981

See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Bar Examiners of State of Nevada, 623 F.2d 605, 608 (9th Cir. 1980); Petrol Stops Northwest v. United States, 571 F.2d 1127, 1128-29 (9th Cir. 1978), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. … In Brown , the district court dismissed the Board from the suit as an improper party. In the same order, the district court imposed an injunction that was directed at the Board.

Oluwa v. California Board of Prison Terms

235 F. App'x 438 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 2007

White v.

Billy Brown v. Nancy Berryhill

697 F. App'x 548 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 15, 2017

See Tonapetyan v. … The existence of Brown’s carpal tunnel syndrome alone is insufficient to establish functional limitations or disability. See Matthews v. Shalala, 10 F.3d 678, 680 (9th Cir. 1993).

Grouse Mountain Associates II v. National Labor Relations Board

56 F. App'x 811 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 25, 2003

See *812 Sever v. NLRB, 231 F.3d 1156 , 1164 (9th Cir.2000). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT GRANTED.

General Motors Corp. v. California State Board of Equalization

815 F.2d 1305 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 1987

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge: Appellants, the California State Board of Equalization, board members, and various state officials, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, General Motors Corporation … As to the individual appellants, therefore, the district court’s injunction may be permissible; but as to appellant Board, a state agency, the injunction must be vacated and the case dismissed. See V.O. Motors, Inc. v.