Opinion

Jones v. California Board of Prison Terms

  • 239 F. App'x 372
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Aug 24, 2007
Status
Published
On the bench
Kleinfeld, Schroeder, Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.0%

The opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s prisoner civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Specifically, appellant’s constitutional challenges to the application of the California Determinate Sentencing Law to appellant’s parole proceedings are foreclosed by this court’s decision in Connor v. Estelle, 981 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir.1992).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.