Opinion

Harrig v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

  • 6 F. App'x 645
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Mar 28, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Fletcher, Silverman, Wallace
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.5%

The opinion

MEMORANDUM 2

Jo Ann Harrig petitions pro se for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (“RRB”) decision, affirming the hearing officer’s computation of her widow’s annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. § 231 .

We will not set aside a decision of the RRB “if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not arbitrary and has a reasonable basis in law.” Calderon v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 780 F.2d 812, 813 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted).

We have reviewed the record and the RRB’s decision and conclude that it is *646 supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.