Rule 3.4. Fairness to opposing party and counsel. A lawyer shall not
Rhode IslandCourt rules
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Rhode Island Court Rules › Supreme Court › Supreme Court Rules Article V - Rules of Professional Conduct › R.I. Sup. Ct. art. V, R. 3.4
Text
(a) unlawfully obstruct another party's access to evidence or unlawfully alter,
destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A
lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;
(b) falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or offer an
inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law;
(c) knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal except for an open
refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists;
(d) in pretrial procedure, make a frivolous discovery request or fail to make
reasonably diligent effort to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an
opposing party;
(e) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is
relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal
knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal
opinion as to the justness of a cause, the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a
civil litigant or the guilt or innocence of an accused; or
(f) request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily giving relevant
information to another party unless:
(1) the person is a relative or an employee or other agent of a client; and
(2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the person's interests will not be adversely
affected by refraining from giving such information.
COMMENTARY
t or the guilt or innocence of an accused; or
(f) request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily giving relevant
information to another party unless:
(1) the person is a relative or an employee or other agent of a client; and
(2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the person's interests will not be adversely
affected by refraining from giving such information.
COMMENTARY
[1] The procedure of the adversary system contemplates that the evidence in a case
is to be marshalled competitively by the contending parties. Fair competition in the
adversary system is secured by prohibitions against destruction or concealment of
evidence, improperly influencing witnesses, obstructive tactics in discovery
procedure, and the like.
[2] Documents and other items of evidence are often essential to establish a claim or
defense. Subject to evidentiary privileges, the right of an opposing party, including
the government, to obtain evidence through discovery or subpoena is an important
procedural right. The exercise of that right can be frustrated if relevant material is
altered, concealed or destroyed. Applicable law in many jurisdictions makes it an
offense to destroy material for purpose of impairing its availability in a pending
proceeding or one whose commencement can be foreseen. Falsifying evidence is also
generally a criminal offense. Paragraph (a) applies to evidentiary material generally,
including computerized information. Applicable law may permit a lawyer to take
temporary possession of physical evidence of client crimes for the purpose of
conducting a limited examination that will not alter or destroy material characteristics
of the evidence. In such a case, applicable law may require the lawyer to turn the
evidence over to the police or other prosecuting authority, depending on the
circumstances.
[3] With regard to paragraph (b), it is not improper to pay a witness's expenses or to
compensate an expert witness on terms permitted by law
a limited examination that will not alter or destroy material characteristics
of the evidence. In such a case, applicable law may require the lawyer to turn the
evidence over to the police or other prosecuting authority, depending on the
circumstances.
[3] With regard to paragraph (b), it is not improper to pay a witness's expenses or to
compensate an expert witness on terms permitted by law. The common law rule in
most jurisdictions is that it is improper to pay an occurrence witness any fee for
testifying and that it is improper to pay an expert witness a contingent fee.
[4] Paragraph (f) permits a lawyer to advise employees of a client to refrain from
giving information to another party, for the employees may identify their interests
with those of the client. See also Rule 4.2.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.