CPSC OGC Advisory Opinion No. 8

FederalAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

CPSC Office of General Counsel Advisory Opinions › CPSC OGC Advisory Opinion No. 8

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

July 12, 1973

Mr. Elliot:

Glanz

Vice President

Natural

Science

Industries,

Ltd.

51 - 17 Rockway P.Q~Ch Boulevard

Far Rockaway, Ne\1York

11691

Dear Hr. Glanz:

Thi::; is in response

to your letter

of Jun.! 19, 1973, requesting

clarification

of t.he phrase

"introduced

into

interstate

co,,m1cr,:e"

as used in the order

banning

certain

electrically

o~eratcd

toys

and other

electrically

operated

childre~

1 s articles

(38 Federal

Register

6133).

The phrase

"intr.oduc.ed

into

interstate

commerce" w.'.ls intended

to mc,.m t!:"~ first

shii_:l'CJ.er.tof an i::idi•Iidual

fin:1.sh~d

product

in

interstate

commerce.

Goods shipped

in interstate

comucrce

'by a

mc.nufacturcr

prior

to September

3, 1973. are therefore

not Gubject

to the abov-3 regulation

and t-muld not be banr:.ed there.by

if not in

compliance.

Stock shipped

prior

to the effective

date may continue

tc be Gold ~t retail

after

the effective

date.

Sincerely

yours,

J .•

5

Paul W. Hallman

Attorney

i."

Office

of the General

Counsel

!

PW!Iallman:mli: 7 /12/73

i

cc:'

GC Chron

cc·Fnes

,P,W. Hallman

,I

/

J

f

;'

/. ,

['Y

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.