CPSC OGC Advisory Opinion No. 2

FederalAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

CPSC Office of General Counsel Advisory Opinions › CPSC OGC Advisory Opinion No. 2

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

I

Jun~ 7,

1973

Mr. W1111am C. Paxton

At t o r nt: y at L.n\·I

311 tfo st

Kansas

I n d 2 p ~ ~lde n c e , i!i s s o u r i 6 4 0 5 O

Dear Mr.

Paxton:

Th!s i~ in regard to your letter

of May 30, 1973,

~~questing

in~ormation

concerning

body strength

and

r,:dn/o~·cement

requir2rilents

for

autor.iobiles.

The Consuncr Product

Safety

Commission has no

jurisdiction

over notor vehicles.

Section

3(a)(~)(C)

cf th:~ Act (copy enclosed)

prov·ldes

thiJ.t motor

v2hic1es

~.r.

?~ r.iotor

veh·ic1e

e_quipme~t are

excluded

from

the

C:cfini-

·(·~

--~

1;1011 of

"consumer

product

11

•

~

•

Th~ National

Traffic

and Motor Vehicle

Safety

Act

of 1966,

which provides

for the establishment

and en­

forcement

of safety

standards

for motor vehicles

and

motor vehicle

equipment,

1s administered

by the Admin-

\

istrator,

National

Highway Traffic

Safety

Administration,

U. S. Department

of Transportation,

400 Seventh Street,

£;. W. , U

hi

t o

0 . C . 2 0 5 91 •

Y

i s h

a

s

n

g

n

,

o

u

may

v,

to

com

­

municate

with this

agency concerning

the questions

raised

.1n your

letter.

Sincerely

yours,

Stephen Lemberg

Office

of the Genera1 Counse1

Enclosure

cc:

Chron file

SLemberg:jsµ:6/7/73

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.