CPSC OGC Advisory Opinion No. 2
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
CPSC Office of General Counsel Advisory Opinions › CPSC OGC Advisory Opinion No. 2
Text
I
Jun~ 7,
1973
Mr. W1111am C. Paxton
At t o r nt: y at L.n\·I
311 tfo st
Kansas
I n d 2 p ~ ~lde n c e , i!i s s o u r i 6 4 0 5 O
Dear Mr.
Paxton:
Th!s i~ in regard to your letter
of May 30, 1973,
~~questing
in~ormation
concerning
body strength
and
r,:dn/o~·cement
requir2rilents
for
autor.iobiles.
The Consuncr Product
Safety
Commission has no
jurisdiction
over notor vehicles.
Section
3(a)(~)(C)
cf th:~ Act (copy enclosed)
prov·ldes
thiJ.t motor
v2hic1es
~.r.
?~ r.iotor
veh·ic1e
e_quipme~t are
excluded
from
the
C:cfini-
·(·~
--~
1;1011 of
"consumer
product
11
•
~
•
Th~ National
Traffic
and Motor Vehicle
Safety
Act
of 1966,
which provides
for the establishment
and en
forcement
of safety
standards
for motor vehicles
and
motor vehicle
equipment,
1s administered
by the Admin-
\
istrator,
National
Highway Traffic
Safety
Administration,
U. S. Department
of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street,
£;. W. , U
hi
t o
0 . C . 2 0 5 91 •
Y
i s h
a
s
n
g
n
,
o
u
may
v,
to
com
municate
with this
agency concerning
the questions
raised
.1n your
letter.
Sincerely
yours,
Stephen Lemberg
Office
of the Genera1 Counse1
Enclosure
cc:
Chron file
SLemberg:jsµ:6/7/73
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.