Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.17s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boggs v. Summers

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

    YALOWITZ Counsel of Record ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 715-1000 DENNIS G. LYONS 555 12th Street, N.W. … YALOWITZ Counsel of Record ARNOLD & PORTER 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 715-1000 DENNIS G. LYONS 555 12th Street, N.W.

    528 U.S. 811
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carl Lindsey, Petitioner v. Charlotte Jenkins, Warden

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 12, 2023

    Brown, 399 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2005) ............................................................ 14 Jamison v. … Id. at 218-19, PageID 11323-24; id. at 244-45, PageID 11349-50.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Anthony Donato, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 1, 2019

    Osborne 557 U.S. 52 (2009) ............................................24 Ford v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ...........................................8 Friedman v. … (I 22-24) .

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — The Dutra Group, Petitioner v. Christopher Batterton

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 30, 2018

    Ed. § 53:52 (West 2018). 6 See also 498 U.S. at 24 (“Congress, in the exercise of its legislative powers, is free to say ‘this much and no more.’ … Id. at 32-33; see also McBride, 768 F.3d at 399-401 (Clement, J., concurring). Again in contrast, the doctrine of maintenance and cure has not undergone a “revolution.”

  • Opposition Brief — Julius Omar Robinson, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 17, 2020

    App. at 398-399; see id. at 5 n.3. … See Pet. 9-10, 24, 26.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Food and Drug Administration, et al., Petitioners v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024

    OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, ET AL., IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS HEATHER GEBELIN HACKER Counsel of Record HACKER STEPHENS LLP 108 Wild Basin Rd., Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 heather@hackerstephens.com (512) 399 … pii=S0091-6749%2805%2902325-0. 24 17 stated: “I have the MEDICATION GUIDE for mifepristone.

  • Respondents Brief — CoStar Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Feb 13, 2026

    Dentsply International, Inc., 399 F.3d 181 (3d Cir. 2005) 16 Va. Military Inst. v. United States, 508 U.S. 946 (1993) 28 Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. … Ct. ---, No. 24-917 (Jan. 12, 2026). But the Fourth Circuit’s approach did not indicate any need for clarification of the applicable standard.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 21, 2025

    Act of July 29, 1861, 12 Stat. 281..................................................................................................21 Act of May 27, 1908, ch. 204, 35 Stat 399. ...................... … Act of May 27, 1908, ch. 204, § 3, 35 Stat. 399, 400 (emphasis added).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Blake DeFrance, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 16, 2025

    Caseer, 399 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2005)...................................................... 32 United States v. … Ibid.; see also Babaisakov, 24 I. & N.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Richard Johnson, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 25, 2025

    Johnson, No. 24-2393, 2025 WL 1949738 (8th Cir. … Id. at 399 (citation modified). Although Loper Bright involved the Administrative Procedure Act, it reinforces the principle that courts have the final authority to interpret statutes. Id. at 373.

  • NOFA for the Traditional Indian Housing Development Program for Fiscal Year 1995

    Federal Register · Notice · Jan 20, 1995

    Indian Housing Development regulations are published at 24 CFR part 905. 3. 24 CFR Part 135. Economic Opportunities for Low and Very Low Income Persons. … ........... 150 150 80 120 100 150 400 to 499.................................. 100 100 70 80 80 100 300 to 399

    60 FR 4330NOFA for the Traditional Indian Housing Development Program for FiscalHousing and Urban Development Department
  • Petitioners Brief — Jamar Alonzo Quarles, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Feb 20, 2019

    Rev. 1009 (1951) .................................. 24 Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. … Ct. 399, 406 (2018). The government cannot make that showing.

  • Jurisdictional Statement — Woods v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969

    Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 86 S.Ct. 518, 15 L.Ed.2d 447 ....00,...... TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED® g ; ii. ~ PABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED Cases (cont'd) . ; oes ae y Page "Glasser v. … S. 85, 88 S.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 + ere are 4 Inte Berry, 68 A.C. 135, 65 Cal.Rptr.273........ 4 " sIn re Levi, 39 Cal.24 41, 244 P.2d 403. eo ae In re Newbern, 53 Cal.2d 786, 3 Cal.

    394 U.S. 320
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Taylor v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

    U.S. 361, 365 (1981) (“[o]ur approach has thus been to iden- tify and then neutralize the taint by tailoring relief appropriate in the circumstances to assure the defendant * * * a fair trial’’). 24 … Florida, 399 U.S. at 81), a court should be entitled to determine whether a newly- disclosed alibi witness is likely to offer perjured testi- mony.

    484 U.S. 400
  • Petition — Taylor v. Howard

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

    Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 399 I. .. 17 Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (18793) — 17 Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1949 11 Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union, 446 .. ͥ … July 23 or July 24, 1976, Plaintiff was taken from Akron to Phoenix, Arizona, where he was held, still under guard, for the “rehabilitation” phase of the “deprogram- ming”.

    459 U.S. 1147
  • Opposition — Ogle v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42. .....0....00000... 10 Cohen v. United States, 378 F. 2d 751. cert. ae SN IT secctasties cscanccadiociencantatsbicces 8 Cooper v. … On March 24, 1980, Mr. Justice White extended the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari to May 4, 1980, and the petition was filed on May 1, 1980.

    449 U.S. 825
  • Reply Brief — National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992

    Tw 0 Poreels of Land, 822 F.2d 1261 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 I ene & New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970).. 13-14 Olcott Vv. … Br. 23-24. The Commission recognizes that the property must be “required for intercity rail passenger service”; the issue is what that phrase means.

    503 U.S. 407
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dunbar v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    Maroney, 399 U.S. at 50, 26 L.Ed.2d 419. See also Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 405 U.S. 443, 458-464, 29 L.Ed.2d 564, $1 S.Ct. 2022.” As stated in Coolidge v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 26 L.Ed.2d 419, 90 S.Ct. 1975 11970). The petitioner’s com- panion had not tried to flee from the officer when notified to stop; at the time Lt.

    419 U.S. 1049
  • Reply Brief for Respondent — Southern R. Co. v. Lunsford

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for Respondent · 1936

    CUTS IN THE rag 7— Court of the United States : - OCTOBER TERM, 1935 | No. 399 e SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, Ve OLIVIA COX LUNSFORD, Administratrix of the Estate of J. M. … No. 399 SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, 4 Vv. OLIVIA COX LUNSFORD, Administratrix of the Estate of J. M. Cox, Deceased, Respondent.

    297 U.S. 398
  • Opposition Brief — Brunson v. Harris (No. 08-76)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

    Rogers, 399 F.3d 626 (6" Cir. 2005). … Response, p. 20 (“statute of limitations may be tolled where extraordinary circumstances beyond a petitioner's control made it impossible ... to file a petition on time”) (emphasis added); Response, p. 24

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.