Documents

Appellants Brief — Miller v. California

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1973

......... 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29 FT, Sate Ge Fa” ae PGE 24, 28 ei TN 88 5 GG o Kala coke os 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 20, 24, 26, 29 estes SORE. 648.4 006 … <2 4 0s 7, 22, 23, 24 RMR 7S eS. 7,22, 24 a OAR ass Ck a 7, 22, 24 Title 28, United States Code < Rallies SOMIMEIE 2 1t 5G a milil corms 2 Text ALR, Proposed Official Draft (May 4, 1962) Section

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — York Corp. v. Refrigeration Engineering, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948

S. 399; Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Co., 320 U. S. 661. … S. 399, 410. This Court has recently reiterated its doctrine in this respect in Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Co., 320 U.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — LabMD, Inc., Petitioner v. Tiversa, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 7, 2018

Hazel-Atlas Glass Co., 59 F.2d 399 (3d Cir. 1932)..................................... 30 Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. … Hazel-Atlas Glass Co., 59 F.2d 399 (3d Cir. 1932) (listing counsel of record).

Record and brief — Charles M. Tremaine and William B. Tremaine, Appellants, vs. Alonzo Hitchcock, George G. Saxe, and James H. Robertson. Alonzo Hitchcock, George G. Saxe, and James H. Robertson, Appellants, vs. Charles M. Tremaine and William B. Tremaine

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1874

(Complainants evidence, p. 24, q. 29). … (Com- plainants’ evidence, p. 24, q. 26).

Petition — Taylor v. Howard

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 399 I. .. 17 Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (18793) — 17 Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1949 11 Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union, 446 .. ͥ … July 23 or July 24, 1976, Plaintiff was taken from Akron to Phoenix, Arizona, where he was held, still under guard, for the “rehabilitation” phase of the “deprogram- ming”.

Reply Brief for Respondent — Southern R. Co. v. Lunsford

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for Respondent · 1936

CUTS IN THE rag 7— Court of the United States : - OCTOBER TERM, 1935 | No. 399 e SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, Ve OLIVIA COX LUNSFORD, Administratrix of the Estate of J. M. … No. 399 SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, 4 Vv. OLIVIA COX LUNSFORD, Administratrix of the Estate of J. M. Cox, Deceased, Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dunbar v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974

Maroney, 399 U.S. at 50, 26 L.Ed.2d 419. See also Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 405 U.S. 443, 458-464, 29 L.Ed.2d 564, $1 S.Ct. 2022.” As stated in Coolidge v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 26 L.Ed.2d 419, 90 S.Ct. 1975 11970). The petitioner’s com- panion had not tried to flee from the officer when notified to stop; at the time Lt.

Opposition — Ogle v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42. .....0....00000... 10 Cohen v. United States, 378 F. 2d 751. cert. ae SN IT secctasties cscanccadiociencantatsbicces 8 Cooper v. … On March 24, 1980, Mr. Justice White extended the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari to May 4, 1980, and the petition was filed on May 1, 1980.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Taylor v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

U.S. 361, 365 (1981) (“[o]ur approach has thus been to iden- tify and then neutralize the taint by tailoring relief appropriate in the circumstances to assure the defendant * * * a fair trial’’). 24 … Florida, 399 U.S. at 81), a court should be entitled to determine whether a newly- disclosed alibi witness is likely to offer perjured testi- mony.

Reply Brief — National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992

Tw 0 Poreels of Land, 822 F.2d 1261 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 I ene & New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970).. 13-14 Olcott Vv. … Br. 23-24. The Commission recognizes that the property must be “required for intercity rail passenger service”; the issue is what that phrase means.

Jurisdictional Statement — Woods v. California

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969

Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 86 S.Ct. 518, 15 L.Ed.2d 447 ....00,...... TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED® g ; ii. ~ PABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED Cases (cont'd) . ; oes ae y Page "Glasser v. … S. 85, 88 S.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 + ere are 4 Inte Berry, 68 A.C. 135, 65 Cal.Rptr.273........ 4 " sIn re Levi, 39 Cal.24 41, 244 P.2d 403. eo ae In re Newbern, 53 Cal.2d 786, 3 Cal.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Richard Arlee Champion, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 26, 2024

Labratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399 (4th Cir. 1985) • • 16 U.S. v. Brannon, 48 F. App'x 51 (4th Cir 2002).............................................. 20 U.S. v. … Automated Medical Labratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 403-04 (4th Cir. 1985); U.S. v. Moran, 759 F.2d 777, 781-82 (9th Cir. 1985).

Opposition Brief — Brunson v. Harris (No. 08-76)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

Rogers, 399 F.3d 626 (6" Cir. 2005). … Response, p. 20 (“statute of limitations may be tolled where extraordinary circumstances beyond a petitioner's control made it impossible ... to file a petition on time”) (emphasis added); Response, p. 24

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dawud Spaulding, Petitioner v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 13, 2019

See PC Exs. 21-24. Defense counsel failed to investigate eyewitness Todd Wilbur. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 412-417 (1986).

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2020

Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970) ............................................8, 9 Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. … (citing Act of March 3, 1887, c. 373, 24 Stat. 552); Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 347 (“[N]o appeal or writ of error from the decision of the circuit court so remanding such cause shall be allowed.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Raymond Rodriguez-Rivera, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 2, 2021

Ct. 399 (2018) ....................................................... 10 United States v. Tabb, 949 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2020) ............................................... 14 United States v. … See Pet. 24-25. That inquiry turns on text—the meaning of words and their surrounding context—not purposive supposition in conflict with the text.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rodney Renia Young, Petitioner v. Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2021

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................. 5 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) ............................................. 7 Gilmore v. … Due process commands that no man shall lose his liberty unless the Government has borne the burden of producing the evidence and convincing the factfinder of his guilt.”); Addington, 441 U.S. at 423– 24

Amicus Curiae Brief — James Harper, Petitioner v. Michael Faulkender, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2025

No. 24-922 In the Supreme Court of the United States _________ J AMES H ARPER , Petitioner, v. … Ibid.; see also id. at 399 (“Entrusting your stuff to others is a bailment [a type of contract]. . . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jasvinder Singh, et al., Petitioners v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada, Washoe County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 2, 2026

Protestant Episcopal Church, 96 Nev. 399, 403 (1980). … Id. at 246 n.24, 249, 254 n.33, 290.

Petitioners Brief — Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2001

J.A. 399-400 (§ 706). … See J.A. 398-99, 399-400 (9 705, 706).