Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.36s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Air Act). … The Court in Duke Energy distinguished, for purpos- es of an analogous Clean Air Act judicial-review provi- sion, “between a purposeful but permissible reading of the regulation adopted to bring it
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
CERCLA section 107(b) contemplates three narrow defenses to liability: (a) act of God; (b) act of war; and (c) act of a third party.” Ronald G. … Instead of cattle and crops, the district court considered the percentage of land ownership by various parties, the period in which the land was held in ownership by each, and the period of contamination
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2025
Yet the decision below found that the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) somehow revived state law claims that never existed. … After the enactment of the CAA and Clean Water Act (“CWA”), this Court held that the federal statutory schemes had displaced federal common law. Milwaukee II, 451 U.S. at 313-14; Int’l Paper Co. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
tremendous amounts of research and capital into developing effective and economically efficient means of helping their customers — power-generating com- panies — comply with the MATS Rule and other clean-air … See Illinois EPA Mercury and Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Rulemaking http/ ‘Hino; topical nir- ita/ : rules/index).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
tremendous amounts of research and capital into developing effective and economically efficient means of helping their customers — power-generating com- panies — comply with the MATS Rule and other clean-air … See Illinois EPA Mercury and Clean Air prteretaie Rule es Rulemaking pr “The experience of 8 some > of amicrs customers under the Illinois rule shows that compliance with rules even stricter than the
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025
air. … The result would be a balkanization of clean air regulations and a confused patchwork of standards, to the detriment of industry and the environment alike.” N. Car., ex rel. Cooper v. Tenn.
Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2020
govern state-law claims under the Clean Air Act). … Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 22, 2019
This Court rejected that argument under the Clean Water Act. See Int’l Paper Co. v. … Several circuits have rejected the argument under the Clean Air Act, including rejecting the argument that common law should be preempted “simply because it is the product of a less sophisticated or expert-driven
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
PERIODICALS AND PUBLICATIONS “Annual Energy Outlook 1993”, Energy Informa- tion Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (Dec. 1992) Ne RR sts in. … Department of Energy (Nov. 1992) at 101. 4In order to comply with the Clean Air Act, AECI’s plans for the future include a switch to non-bituminous, low-sulphur Western coal.
509 U.S. 924Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
grass, and clean water. … COMBINING THE RELATIVE PERMANENCE AND SIGNIFICANT NEXUS STANDARDS IS THE MOST APPROPRIATE TEST OF CLEAN WATER ACT AUTHORITY.
Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
EPA’s Transfer of Clean Water Act Au- ee OP SED cnctsccctensccitseniscscncnstoiennese B. … EPA’S TRANSFER OF CLEAN WATER ACT NPDES AUTHORITY IS AN AGENCY “ACTION” SUBJECT TO ESA § 7. A. EPA’s Transfer of Clean Water Act Author- ity to States.
551 U.S. 644Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024
Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstiutitonal?, 98 MICH. L. REV. 303 (1999) ................................................................. 12 Cass R. Sunstein, Is OSHA Unconstitutional?, 94 VA. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Janet L. Himsel, et al., Petitioners v. 4/9 Livestock, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2020
DRA has members across South Dakota working for healthy and just food and agriculture systems that protect clean air, water, and soil for all the current and future inhabitants of South Dakota. … CAFOs emit significant amounts of odor, dust, noxious gas, pathogens, and other harmful air pollutants, which travel by wind to neighboring properties and stay in the air for long periods.15 These emissions
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jorge Alejandro Rojas, Petitioner v. Federal Aviation Administration
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 1, 2021
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 110 ................................... 8 Freedom of Information Act, Pub. … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 110. 723 F.3d 1201, 1204, 1205, 1207 (10th Cir. 2013).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
EPA’s Transfer of Clean Water Act Au- i NI secistnccnssetnnestnsttcaneseiinnpiiads B. … EPA’S TRANSFER OF CLEAN WATER ACT NPDES AUTHORITY IS AN AGENCY “ACTION” SUBJECT TO ESA § 7. A. EPA’s Transfer of Clean Water ant Author- ity to States.
549 U.S. 1105Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
. : % : ’ 4) ” Aire "AUTHORITIES CITED | ee , | Sec. 514 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors Civil Relief Act_3, 4,5 The Nebraska Revenue Act of 1967, § 7 7. -2704, BR. … The Nebré ka Salés and Use Tax was imposed at the 2% for the period June 1, 1967, through - ‘January 1, 1969, when it was cut to 2%.
393 U.S. 1012Amicus Curiae Brief — Hughes v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-155)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987)....................666 24 Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air®® to determine the controlling opinion.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Erik Lindsey Hughes, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2018
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) ........................ 24 Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air 26 to determine the controlling opinion.
Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
comprehensive proposed amendments to the Clean Water Act. … Finally, section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which concerns “discharge[s] of Gredged or fill material,” 33 U.S.C. § 1344, is triggered only when “dredged or fill material,” which the Clean Water Act
547 U.S. 370Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2025
(cleaned up)). … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96–97 (1995); see also Morales v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.