Documents

Safety Zones; San Francisco, CA

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 18, 2017

Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone 415-399-3585, email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … For more about privacy and the docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086).

COLVILLE CONFEDERATED TRIBES (2020)

Tribal code · Tribal code

FOR (JB, KC, JF, NS, DB, SZ, RF, AJ, JS, VM, RS, MK, JME) 0 AGAINST 0 ABSTAINED 13 FOR (JB, KC, JF, NS, DB, SZ, RF, AJ, JS, VM, RS, MK, JME) Page 2 of 5 2020-397.m&b.cdc 2020-398.m&b.cdc.fish 2020-399 … FOR (JB, KC, JF, NS, DB, SZ, RF, AJ, JS, VM, RS, MK, JME) 0 AGAINST 2020-408.l&j.m&b.cdc 2020-409.l&j TABLED To approve amendments for Chapter 3-6 Fireworks, creating a new Section at Chapter 3-6-24

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

Hazen, 451 A.2d 398,.399 (N.H. 1982) (permitting divorce to take effect, notwithstanding the wife's death during the pendency of the husband's appeal related to property rights); Stritch v. … Jan. 24, 2008)] that fees incurred after the date of the final divorce decree could not have been part of the property settlement,' and, therefore, were required to be reviewed under Gosselin".).

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

Hazen, 451 A.2d 398,.399 (N.H. 1982) (permitting divorce to take effect, notwithstanding the wife's death during the pendency of the husband's appeal related to property rights); Stritch v. … Jan. 24, 2008)] that fees incurred after the date of the final divorce decree could not have been part of the property settlement,' and, therefore, were required to be reviewed under Gosselin".).

Motion — American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1977

District of Columbia before judgment, the object in both cases being to obtain review in this Court of a Memorandum Opinion and Order on Jurisdictional Issues issued by the district court on November 24 … Nixon, 418 U.S, 683 (1974); New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S, 292 (1970).

Respondents Opposing Brief — Goggin v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement of Cal.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Opposing Brief · 1949

A. “(2d). 1944), 139 F. (24) 935. … A. 5, 1943), 134 F, (2d) 399, at page 401, in interpreting the effect of Section 67, sttbdivision.

Opposition Brief — Santa Cruz Co. v. Labor Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1938

Exhs. 15, 24, 28, 34). It is located in the San Francisco Bay area, the greatest shipping center in the United States for canned fruit and vege- tables (Bd. Exhs. 25, 35). … OL LE WOE OS Og (Po 1 eer _ ws ‘ — . - SSE oa tH tee 18 399; Southern Railway Co. v. United States, 222 _U.8. 20.

Prologue — Thomas v. Tennessee (No. 05-872)

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) ........... 5,9 We CI 399 U.Bi29, 219 FRED 6 ke ae eae 10 Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114 (1977) ............ 7 Neil v. … NCJ 161258, 24 CPE oleae chs Sek Reed Reb owas sebes l PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner, Howard Walter Thomas, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the Opinion and

Respondents Brief in Opposition — Magruder v. Supplee

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1942

Plestcheeff, 100 i". s 24) 62. Lie a Commissioner’ Vv. Coward, 110 F. (2d 725 - 4,7,8 Commissioner v. Patrick Cudahy F. Co. 110 F. 42d) = 925 Vises = an Walsh-McGuire Co. v. … The opinion (R. 28), of the Circuit Court of Appeals is, reported in 123 F. (2d) 399. = 2° | ; 7 JURISDICTION.

Brief for the Respondent — Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent · 1940

Wabash aoe Com-’ pany equity bow ebongs expired ‘more than- seven years _ prior to the ndment of ‘August 11, 1939 (R. 24). … Aetna ° Indemnity Co., 91 Conn. 399 (1917); Spooner v. Blair, 209 -lowa 1113 (1930) ; Matchan v. Phoenix Land Inv. Co., 139 © Minn, 132 (1924) ; and Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations — ~ (Perm.

Prologue — Gementera v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

PUNISHMENT CONFLICTS WITH OTHER CIRCUITS ‘ND THIS COURTS PRECEDENT INTERPRETING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT’S PROSCRIPTION OF CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS. .................... 20 ee Be ARR EIB EN See os 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .............ccceeceeeees 21 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) ..........ccccccsecseeeees 22 Houchins v.

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 4, 2006 / Notices

Agency decision · Agency decision

Take notice that the Commission received the following electric rate filings: Docket Numbers: ER99–1293–008; ER06–398–001; ER06–399–001; ER04– 268–004; ER98–4159–007. … LLC submits its compliance electric Refund Report pursuant to the Commission’s order issued August 24, 2006. Filed Date: September 25, 2006. Accession Number: 20060925–5005. Comment Date: 5 p.m.

Opposition — Fidelity Construction Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Petitioner contends that the question whether interest accrues on an uncertified claim is “of exceptional impor- tance” and is causing “confusion” for government contrac- tors (Pet. 24). … Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976), quoting United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969), and therefore 28 U.S.C. (Supp. V) 2412(d)(3) cannot authorize payment of a fee award here.

Motion — Morris v. Duby

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1927

appeal entered on the 29th day of October, 1926; and vacate the order and decree herein; and further these appellants again renew their application made for a Stay applied for in this Court on May 24 … A. 399, 131 Fed. 415. In the ease at bar the order of the Commission may to some extent (the exact extent it is unnec- essary to define) be the basis of further proceed- ings.

Opposition — Taibe v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Petitioner suggests (Pet. 24, 30) that coercion must be implied because petitioner was carrying contraband and thus would not have consented to be searched voluntarily. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 (1970). 4.

Opposition — Florida v. Coler

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) Coler v. State, 418 So.2d 238 (Pla. 1982) Collins v. State, 550 $.W.2d 643 (Tenn. 1977) Enmund v. … Powell on September 24, 1982. A THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DID NOT DECIDE A FEDERAL QUESTION WARRANTING THIS COURT'S REVIEW.

Reply Brief — Connecticut v. Colton

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 102 S.Ct. 2083, 72 L.EG.24 416 (1982) ........... peawsoe Mee Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 6 op Sere rerr wy a ad State v. … Wurzbach, 280 US. 396, 399, 50 S.Ct. 167, 169, 74 L.Ed. 508 (1930). Nor does the respondent’s reference to this Court’s denial of certiorari in other cases buttress his argument.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Albert Randolph, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 13, 2023

Amend. (4) Brady v, Maryland, 373 Us, 83,10 L.Ed, Ad 215,83 Sed. 194 C1IES); Thomas v- State, M1) Swe 8d 399 (Tex. … LEXTS 24° Ex, pacte Miller, 2006 Tex, Crim« Dep. unpub. LEK TS 207. ~CONCLUSION The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

Brief for the Appellant — Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Appellant · 1943

Cravens, 178 U. 8. 389, 398, 399, 44 L. ed11167 1123, - .- 1124, 20 S.. … S: 389, 399,.69 L..ed. 342, 349, 45 5S Ct. 129.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Palm Court, Inc. v. District Court of Appeal of Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

Horwitz, Esq. 7000 Central Parkway Suite 1460 Atlanta, GA 30328 (404) 399 6066 Counsel of Record Carl A. Sax, Esq. 6015 N. … Horwitz, Esq. 7000 Central Parkway Suite 1460 Atlanta, GA 30328 (404) 399 6066 "a pee Carl A. Sax, ez 6015 N.