Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Petition — Huecker v. Weisenberger
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Ct. 1970 (1978) ...12, 24 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educa- tion, 66 F.R.D, 483 (W.D.N.C. 1975) .......00.. 24 Taylor v. … News 6338 ...16, 24, 27, 28 APPENDIX A Contents PAGE Weisenberger, et al. v.
444 U.S. 880Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gray v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Ct. 399, 50 L Ed 2d 339 (1976), the dissent argued that this type of dismissal for cause could not be "sanctioned as ‘harmless error'." 472 So.2d at 425. The voir dire of Mrs. … Davis, 429 U.S. 123, 97 S.Ct. 399, 50 L.Ed2d 339 (1976). In Davis, the improper exclusion of a juror invalidated the subsequent imposition of the death penalty.
481 U.S. 648Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Miller v. United States (No. 09-467)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
See Caseer, 399 F.3d, at 840; Cosby, 682 F.2d, at 1383; Delay, 440 F.2d, at 568. … App. 24 Effective: January 7, 2008 18 U.S.C.A. § 111.
Premium Tax Credits and Federal Health Insurance Exchanges: Questions and Answers
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 8, 2015
See, e.g., Petition for Certiorari, at 24-25, King v. … October 3, 2014) at 11-12. 38 See, e.g., id. at 24-27. 39 See id. at 24. 40 Brief for Respondents in Opposition, King v. Burwell, No. 14-114 (U.S. October 3, 2014) at 25-26.
R43833Congressional Research ServiceJurisdictional Statement — Florida v. Zafra
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1985
Mendenhall, eS ee ee, ia, 24 26 United States v. Ross, U.S. ‘ eo. wee ae) eee 23, 24 Vv TABLE OF CITATIONS CASE PAGE United States v. Santana, ee 22 United States v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970).
471 U.S. 1119Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Duncan v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
The government responded on April 24, 1999 (R1-5), and moved to dismiss the mo- tion as an abuse of the section 2255 remedy. (R1-4). … at 399.
500 U.S. 919Opinion — Union Pacific R. Co. v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913
Heth. 3 Cranch, 399, 413; Reynolds v. McArthur, 2 Pet. 417: United States v. American Sugar Refining Co., 202 U. S. 963, 577; Winfree, Admr., v. Northern Pac. Railway Co., 227 U.S. 296. … on considering the act of June 24, 1912. as one of limitation.
231 U.S. 190Final Flood Hazard Determinations
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 25, 2015
City of Standish City Hall, 399 East Beaver Street, Standish, MI 48658. Township of Arenac Township Office, 2596 State Road, Standish, MI 48658. … [FR Doc. 2015-03837 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
80 FR 10140Homeland Security DepartmentFederal Emergency Management AgencyAgency decision · Agency decision
Elbe divorced on October 24, 2012. The divorce decree, entered on December 20, 2012, stated that Mr. … On April 24, 2014, the IRS Appeals Office reversed CCISO's preliminary determination and issued a final notice of determination to Mr.
United States Tax CourtJurisdictional Statement — Sociedad De Mario Mercado E Hijos v. Puerto Rico
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1966
Carmack, 399 eee . 6, 39a ‘United States v. Certain Real Estate, 217 F. 2d 920. 6, 40a United States v, Procter and Gamble, 356 U.S. 677..... 28a “United States v. … Sociedad Mario Mercado e Hijos, case-number. 64-24 not yet reported in the official reports of the said court.
383 U.S. 412Reply Memorandum — Littell v. Nakai
Supreme Court brief · Reply Memorandum · 1966
Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 399) that the language of this Court’s opinions must be read in the light of the facts of the case under discussion. 4. Moreover, while respondent argues (Br. … Garland, 342 F. 24 369. That, plainly enough, was a proceeding beyond the competence of a State court under Wiliams v.
382 U.S. 986Reply Brief — Reece v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996
Pet. at 23-24 n.12. Any objections to consideration of that part of the question are therefore waived. Rule 15.2. Commission v. … Norge, 486 U.S. 399 (1988), that the fact that a state law claim may be parallel to one that could have been presented under a CBA does not warrant preemption by the LMRA.
519 U.S. 864Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1907
Argued October 24, 1907.—Decided December 23, 1907. … S. 24; The Belgenland, 114 U. 8. 355; The Brantjord City, 29 Fed. Rep. 373.
207 U.S. 398Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
The following chart de- picts the area in controversy: va Uren See Gava Mc6urnc Gave 2.1 ae eT TR TE Ve “2.2 g Secriow 24 Pn = section lines based on McGuire section corner —-- = section lines … Hamilton (1952) 109 Cal.App.2d 399, 404; Drzewiecki v. H & R Block, Inc., (1972) 24 Cal.App. 3d 695, 705-706; ef. Geraghty v. Gray (1957) 152 Cal. App.2d 344.) The judgment is affirmed.
429 U.S. 826Appellants Brief — King v. Priest
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1948
McLeod, 199 Miss. 676, 24 So. (2d) 319, certiorari denied 399 U. §. 863, 90 L. Ed. 1633, 66S. Ct. 1368 ....cec cece ee eeeeececeeercesserers City of Springfield v. Clouse, 206 S. … McLeod, 199 Miss. 676, 24 So. (2d) 319, certiorari denied 322 U. S. 863, 90 L. Ed. 1633, 66 S.
333 U.S. 852Appendix — Garner v. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1993
not there was a violation of compact law, all of which have resulted in no action.” 5a (4) By letter to O.C.C. in connection with an application to add to his status in the Bank dated September 24 … Bernard Richland, Referee July, 1991 12a State of New York Grievance Committee for the Ninth Dudtctal District Crosswest Office Center 399 Knollwood Road - Suite 200 White Plains, N.Y. 10603
507 U.S. 913Opposition Brief — Boulware v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
Although peti- tioner contends (Pet. 24-25) that the question was rele- vant even if it did refer to invoices prepared for others, petitioner did not present that argument to the district court or … WATERS ~ Counsel of Record 2115 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90405 (310) 399-3259 DENNIS E. W.
546 U.S. 814Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 28, 2018
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) ("Sentencing judges are vested with wide discretion in the exceedingly difficult task of determining the appropriate punishment in the countless variety of situations that … On the other thre 22 years a firearm charges, it's going to be five 23 years on on each charge for a total of eighteen 24 s, we the firearms charges; and as counsel know 25 with cannot suspend
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rodolfo Trejo, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 22, 2018
Trejo was 4, which placed him in criminal history category III and resulted in a suggested Guidelines range of 24 to 30 months' imprisonment.' … Wright, 747 F.3d 399, 413 (6th Cir. 2014).
Reply Brief — Orlando Cordia Hall, Petitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 19, 2020
See Opp. 24-25. 11 There is no case law support for such a standard. The panel cited Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008), but, as discussed in Mr. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). And “when, as in this case, ‘the normal course of appellate review might otherwise cause the case to become moot,’ * * * issuance of a stay is warranted.”
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.