Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.38s
Amicus Brief — United States v. Cronic
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), dictate a contrary result. … Adams, 465 F.2d 1023 (24 Cir. 1972) (failure to file motion to suppress and ill- advised cross-examination) Cooks v.
466 U.S. 648Respondents Brief — Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986
Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399. … Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399.
474 U.S. 481Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 18, 2022
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399–401 (1923). … Nebraska, 262 U.S. at 399; see Pierce v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sirhan B. Sirhan, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 18, 2024
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ………………………..……………………….23 Gibson v. Berryhill, 411 U.S. 564 (1973)……………………………………….…….........14 Gideon v. … Here, the Petitioner was a youthful offender 14 (aged 24), has a nearly pristine record in prison, with no prior or subsequent convictions.
Brief for Petitioner — Bushnell v. Ellis
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1961
R. 399, 313,8.W. 2d 4 287 TV ESRERMS FAB. ye oe ste Oe sbedy oo Kar parte Davis, a1 Tex. Cr. R. 608, 108 SAW. S894 27 1 Pi aphid Harrelson, Qi Okla. es. R. 399, 264 :. Bibbs Vv. … He stated several times that he was framed (R. 21, 22, 24) and that he had never seen Myers CR. 21, 24).
366 U.S. 418Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2007
EPA , 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005). The sole purpose of this proposed rule is to address timing issues associated with the Agency's response to the Waterkeeper decision. … EPA , 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005) (hereafter referred to as Waterkeeper ).
72 FR 26582Environmental Protection AgencyEmbassy Security: Background, Funding, and the Budget
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Oct 4, 2001
Following the Advisory Panel report, Congress took up the issue of international terrorism and security and passed the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-399). … include Capital, Physical Security, Construction Security (primarily security against infiltration at construction sites), and Counter-terrorism. 8 State Department briefing on embassy security, August 24
RL30662Congressional Research ServiceOpinion — Erie R. Co. v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914
Argued April 24, 27, 1914.—Decided May 25, 1914. … See Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U.S. 352, 399.
233 U.S. 671Petition for Writ of Certiorari — California v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1951
State Tax Comm., 156 Ore. 461, @ P. 24 161... 16 Brooke v. State, 155 Ala. 78, 46 So. 491 . 16 Collins v. Yosemite Park and Curry Company, 304 U. S. 518, 58 S. Ct. 1009, 82 L. … S. 399, 16 S. Ct. 837, 40 L.
342 U.S. 885Opposition Brief — Maloney v. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District of New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
BuNzE* Of Counsel GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DisTRICT Attorneys for Respondent 399 Knollwood Road, Suite 200 White Plains, NY 10603 (914) 949-4540 * Counsel of Record 175119 ce … As is set forth in the Report of the Special Referee, at page 10, at the conclusion of the hearing the matter was adjourned to May 24, 2000, for the mutual exchange and filing of proposed findings
537 U.S. 827Amicus Curiae Brief — China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, 138 S. Ct. 1800 (2018) (No. 17-432)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
members of the class, plaintiffs here, could pursue their claims only individually, whether by filing separate actions, joining their individual claims under Rule 20, or inter- vening under Rule 24 … Jd. at 399.
Brief of the Petitioners mmm — Turner v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Brief of the Petitioners mmm · 1967
eo , _ Supreme Court uf the United States OcToBER Term, 1966 No. 399. … J ~~ ie SES - Supreme Court of the Bnited States Ocroser TzRm, 1966 No. 399 .
386 U.S. 773Motion to Affirm — W. R. Arthur & Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Taxation
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1963
E. (24) UN gh ene 17 ae : ; . PAGE Hans Rees. Sons (1931), 283 U. S. 123, 51 Sup. eS. 385, 75 L. Ed. 679 Teer E SNe npechiondanetaas Sates sant cabanas ae N. W. States Portland — Co. v. … S. 399, 34 Sup. Ct. 136, 58 L. Ed. 285; ;Eisner v. MacComber (1919), 252: U. S. 189, 40 Sup. Ct. 189, 64 L. Ed. 521.
374 U.S. 94Opposition — Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. National Organization for Women
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 418, cert. granted, 396 U.S. 1056 (1970); Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 (1960). The same parties are not involved here. … No. 94-1178, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., at 24-25 (1976); House Conf. Rep. No. 94-1441, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., at 25 (1976). The House Report on the bill, H. Rep.
431 U.S. 924Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Oddo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Feld- man, 136 F. 2d 394, 399 (2 Cir.). … Ais SA thd aint 0d iO 24 acts were committed innocently or through mistake or ‘misunderstanding.
393 U.S. 844Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Union Loca] 598, a Se ‘Building Service and Maintenance Employees Union | ~ No. 399, Los Angeles Mailers’ Union No. 9, and Los _-Angeles Paper Handlers’ Union No. 3, hereinafter re- ferred‘to as “ … On April 24, 1968, respondent unions and respondent Regional Di- rector ftled answers to petitioners’ motion for leave to ‘intervene and requests for reconsideration by the Court of Appeals of its
393 U.S. 926Motion to Dismiss — Kelly v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1979
COMMONWEALTH v, KetLy, 245 Pa, Supertor Cr. 351, 362, ace’p, 399 A.2p 1061, (1979), ARGUMENT HRS Cather‘ GeeR SATUS. … On 9/24/73 at approximately 12:30 p.m. my informant had cause to be inside the 'Chippy's Bar!
444 U.S. 947Reply Brief — Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991
United States, 350 U.S. 399 (1956) il . Weteioen 4 MG om i ba oe on Craig v. Harney, 331 U.S. 367 (1947)... 12, 13 : 1908). ae American Law ™ Eaton v. … Re- spondent’s Brief, at 23-24. Respondent has miscast our argument as requiring such absurd results.
501 U.S. 1030Motion to Dismiss Appeal — New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss Appeal · 1958
on * * * business’’ within the City., The rate is Ys of 1% and the tax is measured by ‘*all receipts received in and/or allocable to the city’’ (General City Law of the: »: State of New York, sec. 24 … United States, 196 U. 8. 375, 399- 400 (1905). ‘ ?
356 U.S. 339Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Savannah Sifuentes, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2020
Hicks, 958 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2020) .................................................................................. 13 United States v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967). This would be much harder here than in Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), and United States v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.