Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1999

10,000+ results

1.38s

  • Amicus Brief — United States v. Cronic

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), dictate a contrary result. … Adams, 465 F.2d 1023 (24 Cir. 1972) (failure to file motion to suppress and ill- advised cross-examination) Cooks v.

    466 U.S. 648
  • Respondents Brief — Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986

    Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399. … Mueller, 463 U.S. at 399.

    474 U.S. 481
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Petitioners v. Chad Everet Brackeen, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 18, 2022

    Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399–401 (1923). … Nebraska, 262 U.S. at 399; see Pierce v.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sirhan B. Sirhan, Petitioner v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 18, 2024

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ………………………..……………………….23 Gibson v. Berryhill, 411 U.S. 564 (1973)……………………………………….…….........14 Gideon v. … Here, the Petitioner was a youthful offender 14 (aged 24), has a nearly pristine record in prison, with no prior or subsequent convictions.

  • Brief for Petitioner — Bushnell v. Ellis

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1961

    R. 399, 313,8.W. 2d 4 287 TV ESRERMS FAB. ye oe ste Oe sbedy oo Kar parte Davis, a1 Tex. Cr. R. 608, 108 SAW. S894 27 1 Pi aphid Harrelson, Qi Okla. es. R. 399, 264 :. Bibbs Vv. … He stated several times that he was framed (R. 21, 22, 24) and that he had never seen Myers CR. 21, 24).

    366 U.S. 418
  • Proposed Revised Compliance Dates Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulations and Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2007

    EPA , 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005). The sole purpose of this proposed rule is to address timing issues associated with the Agency's response to the Waterkeeper decision. … EPA , 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005) (hereafter referred to as Waterkeeper ).

    72 FR 26582Environmental Protection Agency
  • Embassy Security: Background, Funding, and the Budget

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Oct 4, 2001

    Following the Advisory Panel report, Congress took up the issue of international terrorism and security and passed the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-399). … include Capital, Physical Security, Construction Security (primarily security against infiltration at construction sites), and Counter-terrorism. 8 State Department briefing on embassy security, August 24

    RL30662Congressional Research Service
  • Opinion — Erie R. Co. v. New York

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

    Argued April 24, 27, 1914.—Decided May 25, 1914. … See Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U.S. 352, 399.

    233 U.S. 671
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — California v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1951

    State Tax Comm., 156 Ore. 461, @ P. 24 161... 16 Brooke v. State, 155 Ala. 78, 46 So. 491 . 16 Collins v. Yosemite Park and Curry Company, 304 U. S. 518, 58 S. Ct. 1009, 82 L. … S. 399, 16 S. Ct. 837, 40 L.

    342 U.S. 885
  • Opposition Brief — Maloney v. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

    BuNzE* Of Counsel GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL DisTRICT Attorneys for Respondent 399 Knollwood Road, Suite 200 White Plains, NY 10603 (914) 949-4540 * Counsel of Record 175119 ce … As is set forth in the Report of the Special Referee, at page 10, at the conclusion of the hearing the matter was adjourned to May 24, 2000, for the mutual exchange and filing of proposed findings

    537 U.S. 827
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, 138 S. Ct. 1800 (2018) (No. 17-432)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    members of the class, plaintiffs here, could pursue their claims only individually, whether by filing separate actions, joining their individual claims under Rule 20, or inter- vening under Rule 24 … Jd. at 399.

  • Brief of the Petitioners mmm — Turner v. New York

    Supreme Court brief · Brief of the Petitioners mmm · 1967

    eo , _ Supreme Court uf the United States OcToBER Term, 1966 No. 399. … J ~~ ie SES - Supreme Court of the Bnited States Ocroser TzRm, 1966 No. 399 .

    386 U.S. 773
  • Motion to Affirm — W. R. Arthur & Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Taxation

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1963

    E. (24) UN gh ene 17 ae : ; . PAGE Hans Rees. Sons (1931), 283 U. S. 123, 51 Sup. eS. 385, 75 L. Ed. 679 Teer E SNe npechiondanetaas Sates sant cabanas ae N. W. States Portland — Co. v. … S. 399, 34 Sup. Ct. 136, 58 L. Ed. 285; ;Eisner v. MacComber (1919), 252: U. S. 189, 40 Sup. Ct. 189, 64 L. Ed. 521.

    374 U.S. 94
  • Opposition — Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. National Organization for Women

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977

    New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 418, cert. granted, 396 U.S. 1056 (1970); Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 (1960). The same parties are not involved here. … No. 94-1178, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., at 24-25 (1976); House Conf. Rep. No. 94-1441, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., at 25 (1976). The House Report on the bill, H. Rep.

    431 U.S. 924
  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Oddo v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1968

    Feld- man, 136 F. 2d 394, 399 (2 Cir.). … Ais SA thd aint 0d iO 24 acts were committed innocently or through mistake or ‘misunderstanding.

    393 U.S. 844
  • Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Los Angeles Herald Examiner v. San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild

    Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968

    Union Loca] 598, a Se ‘Building Service and Maintenance Employees Union | ~ No. 399, Los Angeles Mailers’ Union No. 9, and Los _-Angeles Paper Handlers’ Union No. 3, hereinafter re- ferred‘to as “ … On April 24, 1968, respondent unions and respondent Regional Di- rector ftled answers to petitioners’ motion for leave to ‘intervene and requests for reconsideration by the Court of Appeals of its

    393 U.S. 926
  • Motion to Dismiss — Kelly v. Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1979

    COMMONWEALTH v, KetLy, 245 Pa, Supertor Cr. 351, 362, ace’p, 399 A.2p 1061, (1979), ARGUMENT HRS Cather‘ GeeR SATUS. … On 9/24/73 at approximately 12:30 p.m. my informant had cause to be inside the 'Chippy's Bar!

    444 U.S. 947
  • Reply Brief — Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991

    United States, 350 U.S. 399 (1956) il . Weteioen 4 MG om i ba oe on Craig v. Harney, 331 U.S. 367 (1947)... 12, 13 : 1908). ae American Law ™ Eaton v. … Re- spondent’s Brief, at 23-24. Respondent has miscast our argument as requiring such absurd results.

    501 U.S. 1030
  • Motion to Dismiss Appeal — New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss Appeal · 1958

    on * * * business’’ within the City., The rate is Ys of 1% and the tax is measured by ‘*all receipts received in and/or allocable to the city’’ (General City Law of the: »: State of New York, sec. 24 … United States, 196 U. 8. 375, 399- 400 (1905). ‘ ?

    356 U.S. 339
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Savannah Sifuentes, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 7, 2020

    Hicks, 958 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2020) .................................................................................. 13 United States v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967). This would be much harder here than in Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), and United States v.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.