Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bird v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, oo AES ere pret a eae Reo k 8 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, US. , NIN cee ek aR te el es 8 Duprez v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48-51, 90 S. Ct. 1975, 1979-1981 (197),. and just lately in Coolidge v. New Hampshire, U.S. » 90 S. Ct. 2022, 2033-2036 (1971).
413 U.S. 919Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2024
Municipality of Comerio, 140 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 1998) ...................................... 8 Board of Regents of University of State of New York v. … Rev. 399 (2011)................... 17 Zachary D. Clopton, Procedural Retrenchment and the States, 106 Cal. L.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 14, 2021
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 511 (2006) (Roberts, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). 14 C. … See Wencong Fa, The Trouble with Racial Quotas in Disparate Impact Remedial Orders, 24 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1169, 1198–1200 (2016).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Geraldine Tyler, Petitioner v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 20, 2022
Kaler (In re Hollingsworth), 331 B.R. 399 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2005)......................... 8 Horne v. Dep’t of Agric., 576 U.S. 351 (2015).............. 5 Hughes v. … McCarthy, 24 Minn. 417 (1878) .................... 7 Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) ...................................................... 5, 15, 16, 17 Martin v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 8, 2022
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988) .......................................... 9 Linn v. … Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988); Livadas v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2026
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ......................................... 8, 16 Commil USA, LLC v. … Id. at 1323–24.
Brief of Industry Respondents — Wilson v. Loew's Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief of Industry Respondents · 1958
Sv 21 Loceccnn | 24 Worcester County Tr. Co. v. Riley, 302 U. … S . 389, 393-399 (1896) ; Oper v. Morgen, 256 U. S. 94, 1105442 (1921).
355 U.S. 597Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cortez Bennett, Petitioner v. Johnny Fitz, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 10, 2025
Rogers. 399 F.3d 626, 637 (6th Cir. 2005); Hall v. Warden. Lebanon Corr. Inst.. 662 F.3d 745, 750-51 (6th Cir. 2011). … Rogers. 399 F.3d 626, 637 (6th Cir. 2005); Hall v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.. 662 F.3d 745, 750-51 (6th Cir. 2011).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Troxel v. Granville
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
, 24 U. … Meyer, 262 U.S. at 399; Yoder, 406 U.S. at 214.
530 U.S. 57Amicus Curiae Brief — Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Bureau of Prisons, 349 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 20038) .............cccceeeeeceee 28 Sherbert v. Verner, I 27, 30 iv Spencer v. … Lutheran SEE Ee 25 The Larger Catechism of the Westminster TE TEN ee 24 The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, U.S.
571 U.S. 1067Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 16, 2021
Br. at 19-22, 36-38. 28 262 U.S. at 399-400. 29 268 U.S. at 534-535. 25 26 13 the Texas statute because it “furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and … (filed May 24, 2019). 75 Miss.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, ET AL., Appellees. ____________________ PRESS ROBINSON, ET AL., Appellants, v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .................................... 10, 22, 23 Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).............. 20, 23 Massachusetts v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 16, 2025
COPLAN, 399 F.3d 18 (1st. Cir.) … COPLAN, 399 F.3d 18 (1st Cir.); and LEWIS V. WILKINSON, 307 F.3d 423 (6th Cir. 2022).
Joint Appendix — Lawyer v. Department of Justice
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1997
(no fee) 6/24/96 210 Normicé of filing Martin Lawyer’s appeal, by Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States. … In both plans, Senate District 21 ranks lowest of the 40 districts in Florida on these 24 socioeconomic factors.
521 U.S. 567Respondents Brief — Facebook, Inc., Petitioner v. Noah Duguid, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Sep 4, 2020
Law § 399-p (McKinney 1988) ............. 26, 27 Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 752.10 (1991) ................................... 26, 27 Or. Rev. … Law § 399-p (McKinney 1988); see Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-451 (1989) (using nearly identical phrasing).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2025
Callais, Nos.24-109, 24-110 (Sept. 3, 2025). … For Robinson Appellants 13–24, Louisiana v. Callais, Nos.24-109, 24-110 (Aug. 27, 2025).
Petition — Robbins v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) .....eeeeeeseceeeeeee 22 Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) oo. 18 Harris v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970).
453 U.S. 420Respondents Brief — City of Costa Mesa, California, Petitioner v. SoCal Recovery, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 17, 2023
Twp. of Hampton, 411 F.3d 399, 407 (3d Cir. 2005) (ADA), abrogated on other grounds, Sprint Commc’ns, Inc. v. … Doc. 24 (C.A.
Petitioners Brief — Devlin v. Scardelletti
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2002
A1l0 (“Under either Rule 24(a) or 24(b), the application for intervention must be timely.”). … at 399 n.8.
536 U.S. 1Petitioners Brief — Harold R. Berk, Petitioner v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · May 27, 2025
Cir. 2015) ............... 10, 24, 29, 32, 39 Albright v. Christensen, 24 F.4th 1039 (6th Cir. 2022) ...... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29 Beckett v. Beebe Med. … Shady Grove, 559 U.S. at 399.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.