Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.42s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Twitter, Inc., Petitioner v. Mehier Taamneh, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2022
Amicus Br. at 26-27, Boim, supra (No. 05-1815) (Boim Br.); see U.S. Amicus Br. at 7-8, 15 n.6, O’Neill v. Al Rajhi Bank, 573 U.S. 954 (2014) (No. 13-318) (O’Neill Br.). … Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 (1980)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Camreta v. Greene
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) «0.0.0... ] Wong Sun vo. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963).......31 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. amend. … Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 766 (1982).
563 U.S. 692Amicus Curiae Brief — Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Dresser, 200 U.S. at 534-35. … Knox Powell Stockton, Co., 83 F.2d. 423 (9th Cir. 1936); In re Canady, 43 A.F.T.R. 2d 79-472 (N.D.
530 U.S. 15Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 393 (1987); Taylor, 481 U.S. at 65. 2. ERISA’s enforcement provisions have such a “com- plete preemption” effect. That conclusion follows from two basic premises. … U.S.
542 U.S. 200Amicus Curiae Brief — Diamond v. Charles
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 482-84 (1965) \(penumbras of First Amendment include many rights not specifically articulated). … Caldor, U.S. _, 86 L.
476 U.S. 54Amicus Curiae Brief — Bartnicki v. Vopper
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Daily Mail, 443 U.S. at 103. … Daily Mail Pub- lishing Co., supra (No. 78-482), but an amicus brief of the Juvenile Defender Attorney Program argued that a ruling holding the State statute unconstitutional “would be a substantial
532 U.S. 514Amicus Curiae Brief — Bullard v. Hyde Park Savings Bank, 135 S. Ct. 781 (2014) (No. 14-116)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
F: U.S. … Wallace & Tiernan Co., 336 U.S. 793, 794 n.1 (1949); see, e.g., Pal Family Trust v. Ti- cor Tit. Inc., 490 B.R. 480, 482-483 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (same for adversary proceeding in bankruptcy).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gulf States Util. Co. v. FPC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
United States, 319 U.S. 190, 224; FCC v. RCA Communications, Inc., 346 U.S. 86, 94; California v. FPC, 369 U.S. 482, 484- 485. … United States, 408 U.S. 811, 841.
411 U.S. 747Amicus Curiae Brief — Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Imrex Co., 741 F.2d 482, 488-92 (2d Cir. 1984) (discussing lack of 8 congressional consideration of private treble-damage provi- sion). … denied, 444 U.S. 1085 (1980)).
469 U.S. 1157Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Krivda
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967). 17. … Davis, 423 F. 2d 974 (5th Cir. 1970).
409 U.S. 33Amicus Curiae Brief — Pliler v. Ford
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
U.S. Dist. … Rockwell Corp., 482 F.2d 569, 571 (9th Cir. 1973) (“In cases where the state agency has been bypassed, the district court should retain jurisdiction for a period sufficient to allow the employee to
542 U.S. 225Amicus Curiae Brief — Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Griggs, 401 U.S. at 434. … Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 496-97 n.17 (1977); Hazelwood, 433 U.S. at 31l1l n.1?7.
481 U.S. 1012Amicus Curiae Brief — INS v. Doherty
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Fund, 59 U.S.L.W. 4424, 4426 (U.S. … Br. at 23-26 (citing Cardoza- Fonseca, 480 U.S. at 441, and Stevic, 467 U.S. at 423).
502 U.S. 314Amicus Curiae Brief — Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
The court stated (A. 422-423) ; A State or local public agency, as the pro- prietor of an airport, can deny the use of its , airport based on noise consideration; a State or ‘local government cannot … ihe 8 2 easements on governmental airport proprietors, cited by the court of appeals (A. 423, n. 8), affords 4 ground for distinguishing between local governments} - action taken in a proprietary
411 U.S. 624Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferguson v. Charleston
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Chandler, 520 U.S. at 313; Skinner, 489 U.S. at 619. … Burger, 482 U.S. 691. 700 (1987)("expectation of privacy .. . is particularly attenuated in commercial property employed in ‘closely regulated’ in- dustries"); see also Marshall y.
532 U.S. 67Amicus Curiae Brief — Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Danforth, 428 U.S. at 80-81; see also Ashcroft, 462 U.S. at 490 n. 14. … Roe, 482 U.S. 46), 475-76 (1977) (distinguishing direct state interference with a protected activity from state encouragement of an alternative activity).
476 U.S. 747Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of New York v. Tom F.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Carter, 510 U.S. at 15-16; Burlington, 471 U.S. at 369. … American Trucking Ass‘ns, 531 US. 457, 477-482 (2001) (applying Chevron to agency statements in explanatory preamble to final regulations).
552 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — Bowen v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Sixth St., #700 Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 482-3550 CHARLES GREENFIELD Legal Aid Society of Santa Clara County 210 S. First St. … Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 218.
487 U.S. 879Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1934
Anderson, 203 U.S. 483..4......... ‘ 52 Nichols vr. Seranton Steel Co., 137 N. Y. 471......... 50 Northern Pacifie Ry. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482..... Operators Oil Co. v. … Boyd, 228 U.S, 482).° . The foregoing is the background which has caused these cases to excite a general interest. ae / The Present Rule and its General Acceptance. a ..
291 U.S. 320Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
(quoting Buckley, 424 U.S. at 91). … SOL U.S. 449. 482 (2007), applied strict scru- tiny to partially invalidate the federal dan on the expenditure of corporate and union treasury funds for “electioneering communi- cations.” .
562 U.S. 1060
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.