Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Opposition Brief — James F. Waters, Inc. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1947
No. 399, 79th Cong., Ist Sess., pp. … No. 399, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. (pp. 1-2).
332 U.S. 767Amicus Curiae Brief — Secretary, Dept. of Education v. Felton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984
Supp. 399 (S.D. Ohio), aff'd, 409 = * 808 FR en Seer tes Wolman v. … Board of Education, 330 U.S. at 21-24 (Jackson, J., dissenting).
469 U.S. 878Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
B, infra, pp. 24-30) are reported at 10 F.C.C, 2d 718 and at 11.R. R. 2d.771. The opinions of the court of appeals (App. C, a i «pp. 32-49) are not yet reported. … CC. ‘2d 399-400). The second oven which oceurred after the re- ‘mand order in this ease, was ‘the voluntary with- Pa drawal of the-successful applicant RAETA (App. 3, 38).
396 U.S. 888Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997 (1994)......... 20, 24 League of United Latin Am. Citizens (LULAC) v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006).........0...cccceeeeeeeeeee 2, 13, 20 Metro Broad., Inc. v. … Bart- lett, 556 U.S. at 24.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006)......................0 8, 9, 11, 14, 23 McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, Sa ctciinlindcenpnbaniieel 5 Miller v. … Counsel for Amicus Curiae April 24, 2017
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Crabtree v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970) .........eeeeeeeee a?) … Lowisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970).
479 U.S. 852Opposition — Vittitow v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ..000cucedenene eee 18 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 405 U.S. 443 (IGE) ..ccesedecduaueeneee 18 Department of Mental I1ygiene v. … Commonwealth, K’y., DUS S.W. 24 275 (1957) ....cccccccccccccccece 15 Wombles v. Commonwealth, Ky., S17 S.W. 24 16D (1958) ....cccccccccccece coos 13 Young v.
423 U.S. 834Opposition Brief — Aguilar v. County of Los Angeles
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Hospital, t al., 97 F.R.D. 24 (C.D.Cal. 1983) 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 19 Potomac Electric Power Co. v. … Jefferson National Bank of Miami Beach, 442 F.2d 394, 399-400 (5th Cir. 1971) [same as Potomac]; Schutten v. Shell Oil Company, 421 F.2d 869, 875 (5th Cir. 1970) [same]; Jamison v.
471 U.S. 1125Amicus Curiae Brief — Mordechai Korf, et al., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 20, 2022
See id. at 24. … United States, 524 U.S. 399, 410 (1998). * * * The use of filter teams fundamentally and unnecessarily intrudes on criminal defendants’ attorney- 24 client privilege and work product doctrine, and
Amicus Curiae Brief — C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., Petitioner v. Allen Miller
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 19, 2021
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (“FMCSR”) span over 700 pages in the Code of Federal Regulations. 49 C.F.R. parts 300-399. … See, e.g., Indiana Code § 8-2.1-24-18(a).
Opposition Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 7, 2025
No. 24-594 In the Supreme Court of the United States ARTHUR SEALE, PETITIONER v. … Petitioner’s certiorari petition at issue here (in No. 24-594) seeks review of that order.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bradley v. School Board of Richmond
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1965
VI, pp. 24-31.) … S. 399.
382 U.S. 103Appellees Brief — Bullock v. Carter
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1972
New Haven Inclusion | Cases, 399 U.S.392, 481, n. 78 ( 1970); Ji. Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U.S. 426, 428- 429 (1964). Russeil v.. United States, 369 U. … Within 24 hours after adjournment 'of the — the chairman shall mail to, each. ae 48.
405 U.S. 134Reply Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998
(RB at 16-24.) … (RB 24-27.)
523 U.S. 637Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Johnson v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Court of Appeals ........ 24 Appendix E - Order From the U.S. … Ratcliff - (1975, Ed Wis) 399 F Supp 760 .. 1-28 . Marbury v. Madison - U.S. (1 Craunch) 137 (1803) ... 1-28 Miranda v. State of Arizona - 86 S.
484 U.S. 830Supreme Court brief · Statement as to jurisdiction · Aug 15, 2019
(McMaster Dep. at 88:15—24.) … (McMaster Dep. at 63:18—24.)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Geraldine Tyler, Petitioner v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 5, 2023
Br. 24. … Br. 24-27.
Reply Brief — Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 6, 2023
(i) Page 1 3 3 6 6 9 11 15 21 24 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 143 S. Ct. 399 (2022) ........................................... 3 Amgen Inc. v. … Sherkow, The Antibody Patent Paradox, 132 Yale L.J. 994 (2023).................................................................... 24 24 22 5 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2020
Harcleroad, 104 F.3d 1522 (9th Cir. 1997) ............................. 24 O’Bryan v. Bureau of Prisons, 349 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 2003) ................................. 3 Roberts v. … Bureau of Prisons, 349 F.3d 399, 401 (7th Cir. 2003). Time and again, this Court has held that Congress’s weighted balance in favor of religious freedom is constitutional.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Himmelfarb v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1949
Molten, 230 Px. 399, 79 Atl. SSR enes 62 Commonwealth v. Gray, 249 Ky. 36, 60 S. W. 2d 133...............- 32 Cornero v. United States, 48 F. 2d 69.........-..-.. … sakes tiielceinbichadakeheticdante ch teosipalidicattiasdasentestimeainccaeeptccakamntinamnnsiinant 24, 59, 60 Beemer v. aed State, 11 FF. Be Fee... 24 Kutler v.
338 U.S. 860
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.