Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.31s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Redinel Dervishaj, aka Redi, aka Red, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 13, 2020
McCarthy, 271 F.3d 387, 399 (2d Cir. 2001). Dervishaj has failed to show that "[sjimple inaccuracies or inconsistencies in testimony [rose] to the level of perjury, United States v. … proof, but the team 21 assigned to the car failed to inventory phones they say were 22 taken from closed compartments of the car, only bringing them 23 to light five months and 13 days later. 24
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dolenz v. Stuart Yacht Builders, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
UNITED STATES, 428 F2d 73 (5th Cir. 1970), cert denied, 399 U.S. 927..App 126 BURNLEY V. THOMPSON, 524 F2d, 1233..... App 127 CHRISTHILF V. … Drawer 24, Stuart, FL 33497-0024 on this the th day of February, 1989. 24
490 U.S. 1021Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Bernard Bell, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 11, 2018
State does not apply This case became final on February So.3d 399, 400 (Fla. Jan. 19, 2017)(sentence final in 1993; see Gaskin v. … State, 237 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 2018) 24. Lucas v. State, 234 So. 3d 647 (Fla. 2018) 25. Marquard v. State, 234 So. 3d 560 (Fla. Jan. 24, 2018) 26. Sweet v. State, 234 So. 3d 646 (Fla. 2018) 27.
Reply Brief — United States v. California
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980
Co., 232 U.S. 399 (1914) 15 United States v. Louisiana, 394 U.S. 11 (1969) ............. Re ne te rare er Ee 5, 9, 10, 11, 14, 18, 24, 25 Western Maryland T.R. Co. v. … Brief, p. 24.
447 U.S. 1Petitioners Brief — Burnet v. Leininger
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1932
Collector, 24 F. (2d) 436...------------ ‘21 Pagel. v. Creasy, 6 Ohio App. 199. -- .------- ROR a Oe 24 Parshall v. Commissioner, 7 B. T: A.318---------------- 15, 16 Phillips, Collector, v. … Commissioner, 14 F. (24) 919 (0: ©.
285 U.S. 136Brief for the Respondent — Helvering v. American Dental Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent · 1943
Commissioner, 124 P. (24) 308 (C. C. A. 2nd); p. 305 . Commissioner v. Simmons Gin Le. 42 F. (24) 327 (C. C. A. 10th) ©... 4 Commissioner v. Rail joint Stock Co. ‘61 F. (2a) 751 (C2. … Esnault-Pelterie, 303 U.S. 24, p. 31... 4 United States v. Egnault-Pelterie, 229 TT, 8. 206 ............ 24 Woolford Realty Co. v.
318 U.S. 322Opposition Brief — Amos Joseph Wells, III, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 11, 2022
SHRR 1:10–24. Wells’s habeas counsel was unable to articulate any material fact in dispute. SHRR 1:10-24. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 413 (1986) (citing Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394 (1914)); see also Townsend v.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Rosario v. Rockefeller
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1973
. —, 40 USLW —— (Feb. 24, 1972) 21 Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969) ........ 12 City of Phoenix v. Kolodziejeski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970) 12 Cottingham v. Vogt, 60 N.J. … Kolodziejeski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970); Bullock v. Carter, —— U.S. —, 40 USLW 4211 (February 24, 1972); Dunn v. Blumstein, —— US. —-, 40 USLW 4269 (March 21, 1972).
410 U.S. 752Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 15, 2011
Box 330, Monroe, OH 45050 January 24, 2011 390042 Franklin (FEMA Docket No. … Box 399, New Glarus, WI 53574 February 18, 2011 550164 Manitowoc (FEMA Docket No.
76 FR 50420Homeland Security DepartmentFederal Emergency Management AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Sep 14, 1998
DOCKET# CP98-399, 000, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION CAG-28. DOCKET# CP97-765, 000, ANR PIPELINE COMPANY CAG-29. DOCKET# CP96-771, 000, WILLISTON BASIN INTERSTATE PIPELINE COMPANY V. … OTHER#S EC98-24, 000, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, AND COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY OF INDIANA, ET AL.
63 FR 49113Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionReply Brief — McIntosh v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1970
Cert. herein, pp. 19, 24). First, the Government invokes the statement in the opinion below that’this claim of ours was ‘‘tenuous’’ (Br. Opp., p: 8, fn. 6).*. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (Joint Pet. Cert. herein, pp. 35-37). First, the Government relies on the fact that Judge Dooling’s proposed order of dismissal Was never actually entered by him.
400 U.S. 869Petition for ReHearing — Higgins v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for ReHearing · 1941
i a ee | ae ie * 20 Id. 169. 21 Cohens v. — 6 Wheat. 264, 399: Puerto Rico v. … . ° ; ; 24 Van Wart v. Commissioner, 295 U. S. 112, 115. 53 Paul & Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 23.65; cf. National . -Outdoor caeteeee Bureau v. Havering, $3 FY (24) 878, 881. . x
312 U.S. 212Opposition Brief — Bertoli v. United States District Court
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
United States, cert. granted (May 24, 1993) NE aii latcsdandesshieskapluhaduvsaonsassassesavkardsvavicacanvas 10 SCA Services, Inc. v. Morgan, 557 F.2d 110 (7th Cir. … Second Superseding Indictment, Count 1 94 10-73; id., Count 399 14-28. 1. On November 2, 1989, petitioner filed a motion to recuse the district judge assigned to this case. Pet. App. 28a.
510 U.S. 820Record and brief — Tibbals v. Carter
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2012
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). … J.A. 24.
566 U.S. 1020Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas E. Creech, Petitioner v. Tim Richardson, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 23, 2024
We distinguished Allen’s claim from App. 005 Case: 24-275, 02/29/2024, DktEntry: 19.1, Page 6 of 8 6 CREECH V. RICHARDSON the claim brought in Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................................... 9 Godfrey v. Mahoney, 2009 WL 5371196 (D. Mont. Nov. 24, 2009) ...................... 8 Graham v.
Respondents Brief — Manuel v. City of Joliet, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 14-9496)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2016
Br. 24-25 n.16, that argument contravenes both Heck and Wallace. … See Graham, 490 U.S. at 399.
Respondents Brief — Black v. Romano
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1985
Eyman, 399 P.2d 905 (Ariz. 1965) (en banc) 42 Hawaii v. Nakamura, 581 P.2d 759 (Hawaii 1978) ... 20 lasigi v. … Eyman, 399 P.2d 905, 907 (Ariz. 1965) (en banc). B.
471 U.S. 606Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Howard Foundry Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1955
The buildings on the Justen farm were never involved in a fire (R. 399). … Oe 24 The Supreme Court of Illinois, in the case of Blume v.
350 U.S. 885Federal Register · Rule · Apr 16, 2019
Part 399, subpart C, sets forth the Department's policies related to rates and tariffs. … PART 399—STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY 251. The authority citation for part 399 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712. 252.
84 FR 15920Transportation DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryJurisdictional Statement — Nostrand v. Little
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1962
S. 399, 81 S. … State Tax Comm., 174 Wash. 336, 24 P.(2d) 1094 (1933).
368 U.S. 436
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.