Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.15s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Vigilance concerning Article III standing is required to avoid using “a federal court as a forum in which to air... … The Eighth Circuit has commented that, because Everson v. Bd.
551 U.S. 587Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021
Attending school during the intermediate days of the 13 Passover holiday would also create difficulties, since there are strict restrictions on the types of foods Jews may eat during that period and … Ct. at 2022 (cleaned up). Consequently, “[w]hat benefits the government decides to give, whether meager or munificent, it must give without discrimination against religious conduct.” Espinoza, 140 S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Oe MN iakca ace cr 15 Defense Contractor Whistleblower Act of 1989, Comments of the Chamber of Commerce on H.R. 2579, submitted to the House Committee on Armed Services (July 10, 1989) 2.000000. 2 … See also Defense Contractor Whistleblower Act of 1989, Comments of the Chamber of Com- merce on H.R. 2579, submitted to the House Committee on Armed Services (July 10, 1989); General Services Administration
502 U.S. 919Amicus Curiae Brief — Hall v. Beals
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
NUN, Bee MY, poo, iiatak hank 7% Vii rv Chaffee, Three Human Rushts in the Constitution of IiS7, bee (ie) pas : a Comment, ¢s tlary. bo Rea. … thyaran \ thy iy it | witient eda te fact aon a aed it fas ‘ite » tiaretoari Th ee oth be apal Vite teddineait ien of previtt a vis 8,ata tte | asta yerti air ser fiail ae chen tiie ds a 6 tioned,
396 U.S. 45Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 10, 2025
Clean Up Good, Didn't We. Thank You, Ha Ha Ha.” 2012 WL 3535866 at *46. The physical damage was in the thousands of dollars. … Wharton says his lawyer should have told the sentencing jury about his “positive” prison behavior during a six-year period preceding his penalty retrial.
Amicus Curiae Brief — New York v. Mateo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
In calculating the ten year period under this paragraph, any period of time during which the defendant was incarcerated for any reason between the time of commission of any of the prior felony offenses … and the time of commission of the crime of murder in the first degree shall be excluded and such ten year period shall be extended by a period or periods equal to the time served under such incarceration
542 U.S. 946Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 6, 2022
This amicus believes that viewing the act of a state Legislature prescribing regulations pursuant to the Elections Clause as a legislative act creates unnecessary confusion. … Br. at 40), but it would be much preferable if it took that further step to clean up its redistricting jurisprudence.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
© See, 1 WPC 32 (noting the exception, but commenting that Mansell was not the inventor). 1! … (Patent) Act of 1836, Ch. 357, 5 Statutes at Large 117, § 7.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
this act.” … Magas, Comment, When Politics Interfere with Patent Reexamination, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Roe v. Wade
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
A woman’s lungs respire 45 per cent more air than normal in an at- tempt to obtain the needed oxygen, but oxygen absorbed is _’ less than normal despite the extra effort of the crowded lungs.® ¢c. … The average married woman expects to bear two to three children,” yet coitus takes place between a couple married during the period of the woman’s reproductive years (age 18 to 43) an average of 2,535
410 U.S. 113Amicus Curiae Brief — California, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2020
City of Nelson, supra………….14 Luke 6:31………………………………………………...32 Matthew 7:12……………………………………………32 Ed Morrissey, Video: Lack of severability in ObamaCare a “colossal mistake”, Hot Air, Feb. 2, 2011, 2:15 p.m … For example, the Act permits insurers to establish limited enrollment periods each year to discourage the uninsured from waiting until they are sick before purchasing insurance. . . .
Amicus Curiae Brief — Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
United Air Lines, 130 F.3d 893 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. granted, No 97-1943 (Jan. WO sete cesar eke Cu 8, 10, 16, 17 Swain v. Hillsborough County Sch. … But that does not mean that someone who simply has to take a pill periodically (or put on glasses or a hearing aid) is disabled.
527 U.S. 516Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Padilla
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
General comments can be found at http//www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm. … [and] there is no exception to this rule for the acts of the CLA”); Johnson v.
542 U.S. 426Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 16-1436)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
§ 1182(f), which the President invoked as authority for issuing EO-2, requires him to act “by proclama- tion.” … When a party decides to invade the legal rights of another party for only a short period of time—a period that ordinarily does not allow for the full scope of appel- late litigation, up to and including
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendrick Jarrell Beaird, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 7, 2026
Army Corps of Eng’rs, 531 U.S. 159, 174 & n.8 (2001) (declining to consider the rule of lenity’s application to the Clean Water Act because the regulation at issue exceeded the agency’s statutory authority … The government must act “through judges whose office require[s] them to exercise independent judgment in accord with the law.” Philip Hamburger, Is Administrative Law Unlawful? 173 (2014).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
RS eee airs NES DE FAT ET ll Clive Thompson, The BitTorrent Effect, Wired magazine, Jan. 2005, available at http://www. … It is not by chance that the Sony decision coincided with a period of unprecedented innovation and technologi- cal progress.
545 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. Film
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Under this standard the waiting period requirement clearly violates the Equal Protection Clause. … The priv- ilege may not be withdrawn. even if it creates the minor nuisance for a community of cleaning litter from its streets . .
413 U.S. 123Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
setierscnssnesiecsescvcistnniisinimnnncpragentpiteadaaaae 24 BB TE Ge osctcetncinsnivtisisesicniintavnstannionnassinel edulis ane 25 BE TFs ee vices cesnccseccssvisnnasscsciisinatemeseaiaiaaeaamaaaa 16 Be UI Bi aire … % See, eg., 29 U.S.C. 1144(a) (employee benefit plans); 49 U.S.C. 14501(c)(1) (motor carriers); 49 U.S.C. 41713(b)(1) (air carriers). 14 necessarily requires the State to tolerate, at least tem-
Amicus Curiae Brief — Frank v. Minnesota Newspaper Assn., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Those statutes, the Charity Games Advertising Clarification Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-625, 102 Stat. 3205 (1988), ont the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Pub. L. … _ ~- 4 | = ot “wy — oo <= = © - i a ae id torres ea a Stell S ] L] ~~ 5 ——, ———— is ‘ j si i ay i — - ——= es Oe aimee a re e i Fo = S _—- a Pics Pe ot ee a x a ie air
490 U.S. 225Amicus Curiae Brief — Pappas v. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
The Pappases presented evidence that “the Agency was acting as a front for the LLC.” Id. at 95a.’ … App. at 20a. 16 Although the Berman Court, in dicta, noted that the legislature may seek to make the “community ... beauti- ful as well as healthy, spacious as well as clean,” it did not hold that
541 U.S. 912
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.