Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2023

based on an ex parte application is limited to a time-period in which there are special dangers of lethal violence. … Act § 842-a; N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 530.14; N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00; Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 83.001(b), 85.022(b)(6), (d); Tex.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020

Air. Reg. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 327 (2014) (allowing an agency to act inconsistently with an “unambiguous statue” violates separation of powers). III. … (“Nodding to concerns raised by commenters only to dismiss 22 them in a conclusory manner is not a hallmark of reasoned decisionmaking.”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA v. Williams

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Jeffnes, Jr., A Comment on the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages, 72 VA. L. … Thus, “many causes of action may grow out of a single act or tort, to as many individuals as suffer damages by the wrongful act.” Jil. Cent. R.R. v. Slater, 39 Ill.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al., Petitioners v. Yonas Fikre

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2023

Luongo, Traveling While Muslim Complicates Air Travel, N.Y. … Nothing else about his situation changed during that period, and the government offered no explanation why he suddenly no longer presented a threat.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Susan K. Musta, Petitioner v. Mendota Heights Dental Center, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2021

of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 … in respect to Cresco Labs’ pending acquisition of Tryke Companies (“Tryke”) (the “Transaction”). … the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (CAOA Act of 2021); b.

Amicus Curiae Brief — LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 EE LS Lae REE ene Oe near ee Ieee SERS ROE 13 Tegtmeier v. … Delta Air 14 Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Stanford v. Kentucky

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Because many adoles- cents act impulsively without a "cold calcu- lus .. . precedfing) the decision to act," Gregg v. … Upon returning to the community, Michael finished school and - 24 - then obtained employment in an air- conditioning installation Ag He subsequently married, settled in a working class apartment

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

§ 88.001(5). 5 hospital stay although her doctor recommended a longer period. Roark v. Humana, Inc. 307 F.3d 298, 302 (5° Cir. 2002). Similarly, Mr. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90 (1983)); A § 2(b), 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

§ 88.001(5). 5 hospital stay although her doctor recommended a longer period. Roark v. Humana, Inc. 307 F.3d 298, 302 (5" Cir. 2002). Similarly, Mr. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, (1983)); ERISA § 2(b), 29 U.S.C. § 1001(b).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gratz v. Bollinger

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

This Court by no means is writing on a clean slate. Of course, the precedent most relevant to the issues here is this Court’s decision in Bakke. … In response, Strong stated: “I am glad to have your comments on the Jewish problem, and I shall appreciate your help along this line in the future.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. E. Jean Carroll

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 11, 2026

The messy, maybe bad-faith, way Trump has handled the case, radiating “reputational damage”, Daily Beast Article, supra, hardly provides a clean vehicle. … Moreover, even if Trump were right about Helstoski, what about the following, from the Statecourt period of the case, where Trump expressly noted, however, that he was only seeking “temporary” immunity

Amicus Curiae Brief — Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

In contrast to the later Supremacy Clause, not all Acts of Parliament were superior to colonial law. … The questions of imperial administration that appeared during the colonial period surfaced once again in designing a federal union.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, et al., Petitioners v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025

GuerreroLasprilla “acted diligently” in pursuing his claim. 589 16 U.S. at 224, 230. … Ct. 728, 740 (2025) (quoting Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 697) (cleaned up); see also U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. John Doe, One, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2021

Ct. 1843, 1855 (2017) (cleaned up). During this time the Court recognized many implied causes of action. But the Court has since abandoned that “ancien regime.” Alexander, 532 U.S. at 287. … Some commentators have theorized that this shows discrimination. See Sarah 18 Albertson, The Achievement Gap and Disparate Impact Discrimination in Washington Schools, 36 SEATTLE U. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — ICC v. Locomotive Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

Labor protections imposed on air carriers under that Act have been held to supersede inconsistent agreements under, or provisions of, the Railway Tabor Act without reference to pny express statutory … Only one Congressman, Representative Skubitz, commented on the extent of such protection and that comment came in the context of a provision mandating 27 The Commission’s construction of the statute

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kansas v. Hendricks

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

. = iS . « aire ? 7 Pat bras a, tml es és il Ns 7 . 1- > > P : ® “¥ ¥ nal as a! i ans > : bd /* @ ’ - -: : bd = A 4 = ba) nae ae ” ca | . : 4 = = 2 .” b= 2 » =o 7 * ? … See comments of Senator Saling, from Excerpts from Hearing of the Senate Law and Justice Committee , January 9, 1990, Appendix C. See also, Scheingold, et al., The islation, 15 U. Puget Sound L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Stewart v. Abend

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

United States Copyright Office ——_ LON PRESENTED Under the copyright renewal provisions of the 1909 Copyright Act, did the death of the author of the underlying work prior to the renewal period terminate … The court then focused on the opinions of the commentators and tersely concluded that there was no forceful agreement among them as to the proper interpretation of Section 24.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Air Courier Conf. cf America Vv. American Postal Workers’ Union, 1! S. Ct. 913 (1991) . Aptheker v. … See Air Courier Conf. of America Vv. American Postal Workers’ Union, 111 8. Ct. 913, 917 (1991).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

A pro- posed rule issued by DOT for comment in December 1992 included a provision stating that “[a] driver who, during any 3-year period, is found to have a verified positive controlled substances … After considering public comments on the proposed regulations, however, the agency declined to mandate any specific period of disqualification even for recidivist drug users. See 59 ‘Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Penson v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

the Court expressly stated that the doctrine then being elaborated was itself constitutional law: The constitutional of substantial equality and fair process can only be attained where counsel acts … A bright-line rule--crisp, clean, and easy to administer--would be of great value both to lawyers and to courts.