Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.27s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al., Petitioners v. Google LLC

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2023

    , https://www.facebook.com/help/3138 29416281232 ........................................................21 v Fresh Air, How YouTube became one of the planet’s most influential media businesses, NPR ( … The same is true for amicus Hassan Khadair, a comedy creator who uses puppetry in his comedic acts on YouTube.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Terence Tramaine Andrus, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2021

    In a curious act of defiance, the CCA ignored this Court’s instructions. … He cleaned for his siblings, put them to bed, cooked breakfast for them, made sure they got ready for school, helped them with their homework, and made them dinner.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — George Anibowei, Petitioner v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 18, 2026

    Carrying a cell phone is “indispensable to participation in modern society,” and the device generates location information “without any affirmative act on the part of the user beyond powering up.” … CBP reported 8 A burner or “clean” phone offers no solution.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

    TIE MITTEE vcicecicscssecsassentsinbastinadebiiisssdanmbenieseimaniiiabiiialids passim Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S.S. … in question”); Chi- 9 cago & Southern Air Lines v.

    517 U.S. 44
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rory Douglas Wilson, Petitioner v. Idaho

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025

    See Public Act, 3 Charles I, c.1 (1628). But not speech. … At best, it impresses him into a kind of ventriloquism act before he has time to think.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    United Air Lines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893 (10th Se Tats va hel Wek Tddnteteienheeeel We passim Taylor v. … There may be a period of weeks, months, or even years, where seizures are well controlled, and then seizures may recur.??

    527 U.S. 555
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Oakland Housing Authority v. Rucker

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    , see Restatement (Second) of Property § 12.5 comment c, especially a minor one, Rowe v. … '* ‘*Similarly, the recently enacted Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act, Pub.

    534 U.S. 813
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cable News Network, Inc. v. CSC Holdings, Inc. (No. 08-448)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    The Copyright Act authorizes the CRB to adopt such negotiated rates and terms on an industry-wide basis so long as the CRB concludes, based on the record before it and after a period of notice and … After the conclusion of the notice and comment period, the CRB is expected to issue a final regulation containing the royalty rates and terms for interactive music streaming.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Locke

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    CIE 20 cvncccsvendstavakensckdeescciss a Pub.L.No. 98-89, 97 Stat. 522 (1983) ..... 2.6.6.6. 505. 11 Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90), ...............- passim Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978 (PTSA … )......... 6 Port and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (PWSA)..... passim H.R.

    527 U.S. 1063
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — New York Times Co. v. Tasini

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    C. 20001 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a publisher’s reproduction and distribution of its entire periodical not only in print, but also electronically, is privileged under the Copyright Act or instead … freelance authors’ contributions first appeared, and are thus privileged under Section 201 of the Copyright Act.

    533 U.S. 483
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — John Sturgeon, Petitioner v. Bert Frost, in His Official Capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the National Park Service, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 9, 2018

    As the Ninth Circuit recognized, under the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1356b, and the Alaska Statehood Act, Pub. L. … This Court even recently applied the clear statement doctrine and declined to adopt an administrative interpretation of the Clean Water Act where it “would result in a significant impingement of the States

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Because the writ of error, unlike modern certiorari, provided review as of 22 period. Beginning in 1885, both Congress and the Court began to scale back on habeas corpus. … By doing so, Congress has firmly established the principle that a prisoner will be afforded access to federal review as of right to air his constitu- tional claims.

    523 U.S. 637
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Ins. Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 468 U.S. 85 (1988)... 15, 21 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page Travitz v. … Moreover, as a leading commentator has stated: “[I]t has been held that the district court, which has granted an injunction pending appeal, may consider whether defendant is in contempt for violation

    514 U.S. 645
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — ICC v. Locomotive Engineers

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

    Labor protections imposed on air carriers under that Act have been held to supersede inconsistent agreements under, or provisions of, the Railway Tabor Act without reference to pny express statutory … Only one Congressman, Representative Skubitz, commented on the extent of such protection and that comment came in the context of a provision mandating 27 The Commission’s construction of the statute

    482 U.S. 270
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington Northern Railroad v. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    Act of Feb. 15, 1887, ch. 130, 24 Stat. 402 (1887 Act). … Both 4 tax laws were adopted following a period for public com- ment and were approved by the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).

    502 U.S. 979
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. Johnson

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

    During this period the number of Hispanic registered voters increased by 83 percent. … These amendments were enacted to redress the more subtle forms of discrimination that had emerged during the seventeen year period since the Act was first passed.

    515 U.S. 900
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 14, 2022

    DHS ultimately reprogramed and transferred $271 million in available funding via authority in the fiscal year (FY) 2019 DHS Appropriations Act to pay for additional detention space, court space, and transportation … Nor is it subject to the APA's notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements.”

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Warren K. Henness, Petitioner v. Mike DeWine, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 18, 2020

    I), ¶ 6 (Mar. 10,1992), available at https://undocs.org/HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9(Vol.I). 8 Comment No. 36 on Article 6, in which it confirmed that “[t]he deprivation of life of individuals through acts or omissions … Ct. 2726, 2742 (2015). 30 HRC Fourth Periodic Report, ¶ 8.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Google LLC, Petitioner v. Oracle America, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2019

    ........... 11 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, Pub. … See Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, Pub. L. No. 105-298, 112 Stat. 2827, § 102(b) (1998).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Helaman Hansen

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 24, 2023

    Does blogging or commenting against enforcement of immigration laws constitute a felony by encouraging individual aliens to remain in the country without documents? … See Kolender, 461 U.S. at 358 n.8 (affirming the validity of facial vagueness challenges if the law “reaches a substantial amount of constitutionally protected conduct”) (cleaned up); Morales, 527 U.S.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.