Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.69s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

    As one athlete put it, “(d)rug testing has forced us to make a commitment to the team and has kept us clean.” Jd. 15 would have been effective in achieving these results.” … For example, athletes are individually fitted with pro- tective equipment containing appropriate warning labels, and this equipment is periodically inspected.

    515 U.S. 646
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Centripetal Networks, Inc., Petitioner v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 14, 2022

    In 685 instances (0.03% of all cases in the period), federal judges presided incorrectly over cases in which they owned shares in a party. … The Patent Act of 1790 was only the third Act of Congress ever passed.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Smith v. City of Jackson

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    Naftalin, 441 U.S. 768 (1979)..... 8 Western Air Lines, Inc. v. … (quoting Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell, 472 U.S. 400, 422 (1985)).

    541 U.S. 958
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Birmingham v. American Civil Liberties Union

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    attacks on government actions under the Establish- ment Clause is a recurring and unsettled ore, the resolu- tion of which could have lasting impact on the growing use of federal courts as a forum to air … The issues would then be properly framed to address a genuine question of deprivation of religious liberty, not an academically interesting question of whether some government act is ultra vires.

    479 U.S. 939
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Deramus v. Jackson National Life Insurance

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    39205 (601) 359-3680 Counsel for Amicus Curiae * Counsel of Record January 13, 1997 COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO., (800) 225-6964 OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-2831 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page BERS AIR … Section 1652 (“The laws of the several states, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision

    519 U.S. 1115
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican Party v. Mink

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    Stat. § 11-118 (Supp. 1984) ............... 8, 11 Act ——_ 7, 1955, ch. 225, 1955 Hawaii Sess. L. : Act of June 5, 1959, ch. 261, 1959 Hawaii Sess. L. … Contrary to appellants’ assertion that the claims here are presented “‘in as pure and clean a factual and procedural context as possible,’ Juris.

    476 U.S. 1101
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

    of 1980, Act of Sept. 26, 1980, Pub. … Plan Amendments Act of 1980, Pub.

    472 U.S. 559
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    The power of Congress is not denied, because Congress can always act. … The decisions of the Court even during the period it construed state taxing power restrictively under the Commerce Clause display this kind of sensitivity.

    505 U.S. 214
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — GenBioPro, Inc., Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 4, 2026

    Acts 740 ................................................... 13 Mass. Gen. … Although a discussion of the Comstock Act is beyond the scope of this brief, amici States note that plaintiffs’ interpretation of the Comstock Act has been expressly rejected as having potentially boundless

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    Whether every claim-narrowing amendment designed to comply with any provision of the Patent Act— including those provisions not related to prior art— automatically creates prosecution history estoppel … Although the applicant is under no duty to reply, the application will be held abandoned if no reply is received within a certain period of time. 35 U.S.C. § 133.

    535 U.S. 722
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hill v. McDonough

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    Sodium thiopental is an ultra-short-acting anesthetic that is customarily used in surgery to induce anesthesia for a brief period of time. … Pancuronium bromide is a neuromuscular blocking agent that acts by paralyzing the muscles—yet has no effect on awareness, cognition, or sensation.

    547 U.S. 573
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Medellin v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    XIII, 12 U.S.T. 2989; aviation, see Air Transport Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Mexican States, Aug. 15, 1960, art. 13, U.S. … Cf La Abra Silver Mining, 175 U.S. at 463 (“an award by a tribunal acting under the joint authority of two countries is conclusive between the governments concerned”’).

    552 U.S. 491
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Harold Shurtleff, et al., Petitioners v. City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2021

    See David Boyle, Pride Banners on Heber City Main Street Draws Public Comment, KPCW.org (June 5, 2019, 7:24 a.m.), https://bit.ly/3ykigtP. … Despite their private origin, the lamppost banners became a topic of public controversy on which citizens expected their city council to act.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Favreau v. United States, 124 S. Ct. 50 (2003) (No. 02-1466)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    , the results of those acts did not meet military standards. … In the late 1990s, the Army, Navy and Air Force began to experience significant recruiting shortfalls and problems retaining certain skilled personnel.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

    The ex- pectations and reliance generated during this period alone warrant adherence to the holding in Runyon V. McCrary. … The factors that argued for and against the Runyon interpretation of Section 1981 were fully aired and considered at the time.

    491 U.S. 164
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. Mergens

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

    a secondary school, the observation made by the Court in that case is equally applicable here: [Bly creating a forum the University does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired … Generally, people do not attribute reader opinions on the editorial page in the newspaper, or listener comments on the airwaves, or those made before governmental bodies, to the respective organizations

    496 U.S. 226
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Auer v. Robbins

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    Continues indefinite stay; invites comments on Part 541. 50 Fed. Reg. 47696 (1985). March 22, 1986. | Comment period closes. Over 200 comments received. … November 6, 1991. | Comment period closes. 124 Cities, 46 counties and 29 governmental associations comment in favor; 25 public employee associations/unions comment opposed.

    519 U.S. 452
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    “ Commissioner Greytok was not writing on a clean slate when she spoke of the regression analysis model adduced by Gulf States in the following terms: “there are lies, damned lies, in [sic and) statistics … And when we started out the other day, I made the comment to you right up front, so there would be no doubt in “The presiding officers recommended adoption of explicit findings that Gulf States “could

    499 U.S. 983
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, 136 S. Ct. 499 (2015) (No. 15-274)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

    Women’s access to high-quality, evidence- based abortion care should not be limited by laws en- acted under the guise of patient safety but that, in fact, harm women’s health.’ I. … This is because clinicians performing abortions access the uterus through the vagina, which is known as a “clean- contaminated field” and is not naturally a sterile space.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania (Nos. 91-902, 91-744)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    Some act paternalistically, honestly believing that abortion is the best solution to every problem pregnancy."' … Greer, Sex and Destiny (1984) (hereinafter Greer). 14 deterioration of our water, land and air.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.