Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.10s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Morgan v. Plano Independent School District
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 465 (1987). … Fraser, 478 U.S. at 681.
561 U.S. 1025Amicus Curiae Brief — Eric Tyrell Johnson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 2, 2026
King, 569 U.S. 435, 482 (2013) (Scalia, J. dissenting) (asking in DNA collection case whether the Framers “would have … open[ed] their mouths for royal inspection”). … Carpenter, 585 U.S. at 303–04.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hodgson v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Roe, 410 U.S. at 163. 462 U.S. at 430-431 (emphasis added). … . at 423-424.
497 U.S. 417Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Comm'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
MCFL, 479 U.S. at 249 (quoting Buckley, 424 U.S. at 80). … Those numbers grew during the next election cycle: “[TJhe Annenberg Center found that 77 organizations aired 423 advertisements at a cost of between $250 million and $340 million.” Jd.
546 U.S. 410Amicus Curiae Brief — Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
U.S. Const. art. … See 2 Farrand, supra, at 423-24, 431.
569 U.S. 108Amicus Curiae Brief — California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Felzen
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Oakland Scavenger Co., 487 U.S. 312 Sr . 4 ce eee eee rs Ss Cec Ce hee 14 Tryforos v. Spanos, 518 F.2d 1258 (7th Cir. the cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1091(1976) ......... United Founders Life ins. … Marino, 484 U.S. at 304.
524 U.S. 980Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Marathon, Florida, Petitioner v. Rodney Shands, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2026
City of Houston, 150 F.4th 418, 423-26 (5th Cir. 2025) (finding a Lucas categorical taking even where considerable market resale value remained, because development was not “economically viable” at present … The U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
United States, 508 U.S. … Air France, 470 U.S. at 396 (quoting Choctaw Nation of Indians v. United States, 318 U.S. 423, 481-432 (1943)). Those are the principles on which the court of appeals relied. See Pet.
539 U.S. 925Amicus Curiae Brief — Artis v. Dist. of Columbia, 138 S. Ct. 51 (2017) (No. 16-460)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Provo City, 389 P.3d 423, 426 ERE aa SOI Ae ey ne nO ONO 17 lv East v. Graphic Arts Indus. Tr., 718 A.2d 153 (D.C. 1998), answer conformed to 172 F.3d 919 (D.C. … The U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper v. IBM Personal Pension Plan, 127 S. Ct. 1143 (2007) (No. 06-760)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Betts, 492 U.S. 158 (1989); Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101 (1989). … In late 2005, the U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bryan v. Moore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
5) Supreme Court, U.S. - 2. … Georgia, 423 U.S. 153 (1976) 1. John Spenkelink, May 25, 1979, Florida: It took three separate jolts of electricity spread over five minutes to kill Spenkelink.
528 U.S. 1133Amicus Curiae Brief — Universityof Tennessee v. Elliott
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Utah Construction d} Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394, 423 (1966), this Court found that the Court of Claims had failed to give finality to factual findings made by the Board of Contract Appeals, when the … Aremer, 456 U.S. at 485.
478 U.S. 788Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987); Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987); Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (1992); Lucas v. … U.S.
541 U.S. 972Amicus Curiae Brief — Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Ed.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
No. 97-843 Supreme Court, U.S. … Carter, 409 U.S. 418, 423-24 & n.8 (1973\that "“[t}he Fourteenth Amendment itself ‘erects no shield against merely private conduct’ . . . is not to say . . . that Congress may not proscribe purely private
526 U.S. 629Amicus Curiae Brief — Ayers v. Clark (No. 06-287)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Bouie, 378 U.S. at 353; accord Rogers, 532 U.S. at 457. … Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 53 (1975) (per curiam) (decades-old Tennessee statute derived from common law, prohibiting “crimes against nature”); Douglas v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979) ........ 5, 13-15, 21 Connecticut v. Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (1975) (per curiam) . . . . 3 Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973) ...........00000. 4,8 HLL. v. … Menillo, 423 U.S. 9, 9-10 (1975) (per curiam) (total ban on abortions was not “null and void, and thus incapable of constitutional application”; to the contrary, ban could still be valid as applied)
546 U.S. 320Amicus Curiae Brief — Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Kewanee, 416 U.S. 470. C. … Kewanee, 416 U.S. at 482 (citations omitted).
489 U.S. 141Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2026
The Court was not moved by the argument “that the threat of costly duty-ofprudence lawsuits will deter companies from offering [retirement] to their employees,” id. at 423. … Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. at 420.
Amicus Curiae Brief — FPC v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
U.S., 395 U.S. 185 (1969)? … principally relied upon by United : _s | “We do not view the cases of Falbo v United States, 32 US 549, 88 L Ed 305, 64 S Ct 346-(1944), and Estep v United States, 327 US 114, 90 L Ed 567, 66 S Ct 423
406 U.S. 621Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 16-1436)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), “the Court found the government action inexplicable but for a religious purpose, and it looked to extrinsic evidence only to confirm its suspicion, prompted by the face … See Sarsour, 2017 U.S. Dist.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.