Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.40s
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. District Court in & for the County of Eagle
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
The United States should be required to complete such identification within a reasonable, specified period of time and should be required to give notice to each affected state. … Arizona, Colorado, Idaho and Washington commented on the studies, but did not respond specifically to the 25 questions.
401 U.S. 520Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Commerce, et al., Petitioners v. New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2019
This argument carried the day, and the Framers concluded that “the periods & the rule of revising the Representation ought to be fixt by the Constitution.” Id. at 582. … This, of course, transgressed long settled principles that demand that agencies act in accord with the rule of law. See Utility Air Reg. Grp. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024
Because the VA did not have “good cause” to bypass general notice-and-comment requirements, its IFR violates Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 533. … Ct. 1649, 1677 (2020) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bowles v. Russell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Re- gional Comm ’r of Customs, 394 U.S. 977 (1969) (petition delayed by severe snowstorm); see also Northwest Air- lines, Inc. v. Spirit Airlines, Tne., 1278. … this act has been properly done.”
551 U.S. 205Amicus Curiae Brief — Dep't of Commerce v. New York, 139 S. Ct. 1249 (2019) (No. 18-966)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002)..............c.0cceeee- 3, 4, 8, 9, 10 Utility Air Reg. Grp. v. EPA, lL EAE EE Re 18 Wesberry v. … This, of course, trans- gressed long settled principles that demand that agen- cies act in accord with the rule of law. See Utility Air Reg. Grp. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Fisher v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
In addition, the Sanctuary Advisory Council commented on the draft plan. Those comments have been given considerable weight in the development of the Final Plan.” … and did not delay the effectiveness of the designation for a stated period, as it did in sanctuaries designated by the Secretary under the Sanctuaries Act.
528 U.S. 1022Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
FAIRMAN, LOUIS HOFFMAN and LORI DANIELS, in their official capacities as members of the ARIZONA CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Respondents. … S Fo Bay Guardian, January 5, 2000 Editorial, A Hard Act to Follou , N Y Times.
562 U.S. 1060Amicus Curiae Brief — Angelica Castañon, et al., Appellants v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 14, 2021
Frankel, Comment, National Representation for the District of Columbia: A Legislative Solution, 139 U. Pa. L. … Tidewater Transfer Co., 337 U.S. 582, 601 (1949) (plurality) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Favreau v. United States, 124 S. Ct. 50 (2003) (No. 02-1466)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
, the results of those acts did not meet military standards. … In the late 1990s, the Army, Navy and Air Force began to experience significant recruiting shortfalls and problems retaining certain skilled personnel.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Twitter, Inc., Petitioner v. Mehier Taamneh, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2023
Air Force dropped two 500pound guided bombs on Zarqawi’s safehouse, killing him. … He later served as the Commanding General, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) from 2020 to 2021. Brigadier General Scott E. Brower, Retired.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Franconia Associates v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
United States, 261 Sei SETI cosncscsniessnntntnienimnnsniiamienanininncetens 14, 19 Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. … Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 299, 304 (1923).
536 U.S. 129Amicus Curiae Brief — Amy Hadley, Petitioner v. City of South Bend, Indiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 7, 2026
Nor was that the first time the Court commented on the issue. In Barron v. … What matters is the impact of their acts, not the purity vel non of their motives.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Operation Rescue v. National Organization for Women, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
As a result, 1 am a trained nurse with 20 years experience who cannot write, read or stand for long periods of time. … on violations of the Hobbs Act.
537 U.S. 808Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2018
Volkswagen, AG (In re Volkswagen Clean Diesel Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.), 2018 U.S. App. … The Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) was passed in 1986 as Title II of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. 18 U.S.C.A. §2701-2713 (West).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 2501 (2016) (No. 15-1039)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
See Comment of the Staff of the Federal Trade Comm’n to FDA at 3 (Oct. 27, 2015) (hereinafter “FTC Comment”).* Moreover, prices are increasing by approximately 10-15% each year, with the average price … - administration-response-fdas-request-comments-its-guidance/ 151028fdabiosimilar.pdf.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Quill Corp. v. North Dakota
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
to close the Bellas Hess loophole during this period. … Youth Sizes: -800- 456-4629 ssaoi ee Sieeee—___... $675 Check box for air. tatrs Seal (2-4, Snail 6-8).
504 U.S. 298Amicus Curiae Brief — Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 ERIS NEBR Sa ctrescaiee de cerry SAD CeR ad chr Se ne 6 South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 bec UN AN te Re 90S ae 5 State v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96 n.14 (1983) (enjoining state law preempted by ERISA); Crosby v. Nat?
562 U.S. 1177Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 4, 2026
Acts 740 ................................................... 13 Mass. Gen. … Although a discussion of the Comstock Act is beyond the scope of this brief, amici States note that plaintiffs’ interpretation of the Comstock Act has been expressly rejected as having potentially boundless
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2019
The Forest Service emphasizes correctly that the Trail-crossing issue is the only aspect of the decision below that cannot be addressed by further agency analysis, factual review, public notice and comment … The National Trails System Act seeks “to promote the preservation of, public access to, travel within, and enjoyment and appreciation of the open-air, outdoor areas and historic resources of the Nation
Amicus Curiae Brief — Watters v. Wachovia Bank, NA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
MacDonald (former General Counsel, Citigroup Inc.’s Europe «1d North American card business), Letter to the Editor, Comptroller Has Duty to Clean Up Card Pricing Mess, Am. … In light of this concern, Congress imposed exceptional procedural requirements on federal banking agencies, requiring them to publish for comment any new opinion letter or interpretive rule preempting
550 U.S. 1
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.