Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Supplemental Brief — Webb v. Webb
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1981
R. 8406, 96th Cono., 24 Sessa. (1980). … minal Justice on the House Comm. on the ne Judiciary, 95th Cong., Te and 24 Sess.
451 U.S. 493Amicus Curiae Brief — Director of Revenue of Mo. v. COBANK ACB
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
L. 100-399, 102 Stat. 989, 1003 (1988) ..0.... ccc ceeeccccceeeceeceeeeeees 25 Farm Credit Act Amendments of 1980, Pub. … 12 Le ee a ee 12 EES ean ean Nee 19, 24 12 U.S.C. 2077 .......ccccscsscccccccccccccccececesesescscccssssees 19, 24 12 U.S.C. 2098 ..........scscccscccsccereceeeeeeesesseeeeeess 19, 20, 24 12D U.S.C
531 U.S. 316Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Russell v. Atlanta Flooring & Insulation Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1945
.__. 2: My WOR etek ec fl 24 III. Statement of the case..................... 24 IV. Specification of errors..................... 24 Wh MU Ccs deren ieicei dies Ss dics ce 28 Point 1. … A. 1a (21)) Seetion 2, Subsection a(21) . 15,21 , 24 (11 U.S. C. A. 47e) Seetion 24, Subsection e (11 U.S. C. A. 107a) Seetion 67, Subsection a........ (11 U.S. C.
325 U.S. 862Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 13, 2017
City of Detroit, 399 F.3d 612 (6th Cir. 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Grazier ex rel. White v. … (See generally Pet. at 23-24.) Petitioner’s cases are not adequately particularized and, candidly, are wholly inapplicable. See Pet. at 24, citing: Terrance v.
Brief for the NLRB — National Labor Relations Board v. Fant Milling Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the NLRB · 1959
charge) that any contract it signed must pro- vide for the Company’s right to raise wages without any negotiation with the Union (R. 156-157, 159, 198— : 199, 203, 279, 281, 286, 289, 336-339, 397-399 … Woolworth Co., 352 U.S. 938, reversing 235 F. 24 319 (C.A. 9))..
360 U.S. 301Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Reginald L. Hopkins, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 25, 2024
App. 223-24. … Govt Br. 24.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2025
Gov’t Br. 6 see also id. at 21, 24, 34–35 (similar). … Gov’t Br. 6; see also id. at 21, 24, 34–35.
Supplemental Brief for Respondent — Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief for Respondent · 1942
S. 605 ; 24 Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur vs. Couble et kaa: 255 U. s. 356 18 Toledo Scales Co. vs. Computing Scales Co., 261 U. S. 399, 43 Sup. Ct. Rep. 458 28, 29 Utah Power & Light Co. vs. U. … Ed. 419, 24 S. Ct. 259.
316 U.S. 641Jurisdictional Statement — In re Trapp
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1982
McVeigh, 93 U.S. 274 ... »© 2+ +2e*s2e ee 2 2 © © # © 8 44 in ce Winship, 397 0.8. 258 wee cee ever eee eeneees 24 Zablocki v. … Alsager, supra, 406 F.Supp. at 24, aff'd, 545 F.2d 1137 (8th Cir. 1976). The Missouri Supreme Court indicated (App.
456 U.S. 967Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tiffany Smith, Petitioner v. Shannon Olds, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2024
P. 24(a)(5). … Dutton, 217 F.3d 399, 406 (6th Cir. 2000).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 13, 2024
Id. § 153(24). … Supp. at 229, with 47 U.S.C. § 153(24), (50), (53). b.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kovacs v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
Commissioner, 317 U.S. 399, 403-404 (1943) (interest constitutes “compensation for the delay in pay- ment”); Tiefenbrunn v. … Comm’r, 317 US. 399 (1943) (excludability of interest on condemnation award under return of capital theory)®.
513 U.S. 963Brief for Appellee — Buckley v. Valeo
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1976
Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112__-- ~~~. 19, 24 Phoenix v. Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204__ _____ 23 Cases—Continued pene Pipefitters v. United States, 407 U.S. 385____ 20-21 Pittsburgh Press Co. v. … Hartke, 405 U.S. 15, 24-25.
424 U.S. 1Announcement of Funding Awards; Fair Housing Initiatives Program-Fiscal Year 2006
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 17, 2007
Implementing regulations are found at 24 CFR Part 125. … Private Enforcement Initiative/Performance Based Component FY2005 Continuation Fair Housing Center of Greater Boston, 59 Temple Place, Suite 1105, Boston, MA 02111 David Harris, ph. 617-399
72 FR 2001Housing and Urban Development DepartmentJurisdictional Statement — Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1974
No. 70-432, Order No. 252, New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392_-__- Penn Central Transportation Co., In the Matter @, Dee © ee. … See New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392; Continental Bank v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry., 294 U.S. 648. The Act represents such an effort.
419 U.S. 102Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Raheem D. Louis, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 28, 2019
Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 399 F.3d 248, 254 (3d Cir. 2005) (quotation marks omitted). … Org., 399 F.3d at 254.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Trevon Wiley, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 5, 2021
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed.2d446 (1970); citing Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U.S. 356, 92 S.Ct. 1620, 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1971). … Id., atp. *“24.
Reply Brief — Unus v. Kane (No. 09-294)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
Commonwealth, 493 S.E.2d 397, 399 (Va. App. 1997) (quoting, in turn, Gladden v. Commonwealth, 400 S.E.2d 791, 793 (Va. App. 1991) (applying, in turn, not state law but Ker v. … See Pet. 24.
Opposition Brief — Dixon v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1948
Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co., 147 F. (2d) 399 (CCA 2d, 1945) ; and Engl v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 139 F. (2d) 469, at 472-473 (CCA 2d, 1943). … Petitioner confuses this issue by arguing that the brief 1908 experimental use was on a commercial line (Brief, pp. 24-25).
333 U.S. 850Opposition Brief — Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1951
preference of $100 a share upon liquidation or other distribution of capital and was callable at the option of the company at any time at the redemption price of $110 per share plus accrued dividends (R. 399 … Any order made un- der this subsection shall be subject to judicial re- view as provided in section 24.
341 U.S. 950
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.