Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Dep’t of Air Force, 527 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. alae a carte ein nneremenneel 4 Woodward v. … Someone who fantasizes about such acts? Someone who will identify himself or herself as gay or lesbian?” M.V.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Someone who fantasizes about such acts? Someone who will identify himself or herself as gay or lesbian?” M.V. … Diamond, Sexual Identity, Attractions, and Behavior Among Young Sexual-Minority Women Over a 2-Year Period, 36 Dev.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Morales

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

For one thing, as a result of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. … Detroit's index increased from .49 to .70 during the same period. Chicago, San Diego.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Z. Crowe, et al., Petitioners v. State Bar of Oregon, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 24, 2025

Bar, Proposed Comments of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the District of Columbia Bar on Support for “D.C. … The Labor and Employment Section of the District of Columbia Bar filed a comment in support of the District of Columbia Civil Rights Tax Fairness Act of 2001, which would have eliminated income taxation

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Lessee of C her, 15 Rac EEE Wii cnssinssciensbinighasiebetommeuttetieceuaneient 7,8 Cleans © Se, DE GLE. … The only other treaty case during this period was Owings v. Norwood’s Lessee, 9 U.S. 344 (1809), which involved a dispute related to land in Maryland.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Community Access Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. DeeDee Halleck, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2019

Similarly, MNN is not “free to define” what content to air on its public access channels. … See 47 U.S.C. § 230(c).5 5 Lower courts have considered whether public officials who block individuals from commenting on their social media pages violate the First Amendment. See, e.g., Davison v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kelo v. New London

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

constitutional); Hayes, * See also 2A NICHOLS ON EMINENT DOMAIN § 7.06[27] n. 25 and 26 (2004) (listing the following states as finding that non-blighted proper- ties may be taken to prevent slums and clean … The court explained, “[the statute of limitations] cannot be used to immunize an agency which adopts a redevelop- ment plan legal on its face, then after the 60-day period has elapsed deviates from

Amicus Curiae Brief — Drebick v. City of Olympia, Washington (No. 06-223)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

applicable act." … Theory suggests, and some empirical studies demonstrate, that fees contribute directly to higher housing prices, especially during periods of high housing demand.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jennings v. Rodriguez, 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1204)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Australia, 4 9.4; accord HRC General Comment No. 35, § 12 (“(TJhe decision to keep a person in any form of detention is arbitrary if it is not subject to periodic re-evaluation of the justification … Without periodic review, states would be unable to meet their obligation to ensure that “detention does not last longer than absolutely necessary.” See HRC General Comment No. 35, § 15.

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Const., art. 1, §8 ............0.0 000005. 19 Agricultural Adjustment Act of May 12, 1933, c. 25, § 9(a), 48 Stat. 31 2.2.2... 2. ee ee ee 19 Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972, Pub. L. … See, e.g., the Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972, Pub. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Immigration Act of 1924, Pub. L. No. 139, 43 Stat. 153 (1924) Immigration Act of 1990 § 303, 8 U.S.C. § 1254a note (Supp. Ill 1991) Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. … Castro's suspension of air travel in response to the 1962 Cuban missile Crisis brought a relative lull in Cuban migration to the United States, after perhaps a quarter million Cubans had left.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Steele, A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance, 52 American Psychologist 613 (1997) .....ccccececcccccececes 7 ne ER RR ee vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES-Continued … Steele, A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance, 52 American Psychologist 613 (1997). See also Claude M.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 9, 2024

Shortly after, the Commission started the public engagement process needed to develop an environmental impact statement, soliciting comments and holding public meetings. See, e.g., 83 Fed. … Santander Consumer USA Inc., 582 U.S. 79 (2017) (cleaned up)). The textual difference between these two provisions is easily explained.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Booker

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Bijou thus presents a perfectly “clean” vehicle for deciding the questions presented because the constitutional issue was properly preserved throughout the proceedings and because there cannot possibly … of supervised release, that period did not exceed the statutory maximum triggered by the jury’s verdict alone.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Fanfan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Bijou thus presents a perfectly “clean” vehicle for deciding the questions presented because the constitutional issue was properly preserved throughout the proceedings and because there cannot possibly … of supervised release, that period did not exceed the statutory maximum triggered by the jury’s verdict alone.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Basf Corp. v. Peterson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The issues remain just as urgent in the wake of that result, and this case presents a clean vehicle for the Court to address them definitively. … Commentators agree that this Court’s “attempts to define ‘commercial speech’” are “more ad hoc than the source of any real guidance.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

'8 Petitioner specifically relies on a comment made in Harris that a union's position on spending may have a “massive” effect on government spending. Pet. Br. 14. … (Keefe 2015, at 11). 37 Similarly, while Petitioner fixates on a union’s role in negotiating wage increases, that task occurs only periodically upon the expiration of a prior agreement.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Railroad Commission v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) Southern Pacific Transportation v. Public Utilities Comm'n: 647 F. Supp. 1220 (N.D. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983). Section 484 of FRSA, 45 U.S.C. 434, is such an express preemption provision.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania (Nos. 91-902, 91-744)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Quarles, 467 U.S. 649, 660 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (Because Miranda is “now the law,” the Court no longer is “writing from a clean slate”). 54 Akron, 462 U.S … or refrained from acting in reliance on that precedent as well.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Buffelen Wood Woodworking Co. v. Washington Department of Revenue (No. 99-38)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

State Dep’t of Reve- nue, 488 U.S. 232 (1987) . 4 3,5 STATUTES AND UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONS Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1841 ..000 U.S. Const. amend. … Some taxpayers, after years of ultimately successful litigation challenging a tax have taken to cynically waving a dollar bill in the air and commenting that they have not received even one dollar in