Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.30s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Line Pilots v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Florence Calvert Thorne, Samuel Gompers- American Statesman 24 (1957). … Baird, “The Permissable Uses of Forced Union Dues: From Hanson to Beck,” Policy Analysis 174, at 12-13 (July 24, 1992).
523 U.S. 866Reply Brief — Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002
/d. at 24-25. … Simmons-Harris Brief at 24-25.
536 U.S. 639Opposition Brief — Asherman v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Gooch, 186 Conn. 17, 24, 438 A.2d 867 (1982); never established that the prior opinion was in fact erroneous. … Herrera, 365 So. 2d 399, 401 (Fla.
470 U.S. 1050Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Chambers v. Beauchamp
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969
Simmons 301 P.2d 334, 61 N.M. 399 (1956)... Rivera v. Hutchings 284 P.2d 222, 59 N.M. 337 (1955) °.......2.......000-..- Stanley v. Campbell 27 $0.2 411, 157 Fla. 891 (1946)........ State v. … Sim- mons, 61 N.M. 399,°301 P.2d 334, (1956). A statutory disquali- fication is made by the filing of an Affidavit of Disqualifica-. .
396 U.S. 942Reply Brief — Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001
/d. at 24-25. … Simmons-Harris Brief at 24-25.
533 U.S. 976Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Florida v. Nease
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Brown, 412 So.2d 24, (Fla. 4th DCA), Pet. for rev. denied, 419 SO.2d 1195(Fla. 1982) 14 State v. Davis, 415 So.2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) 14 State v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 80 | n.5 (1970).
481 U.S. 1041Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Green, 399 U S 149, 155-156, 90 S Ct 1930, rt -15- 26 L Ed 2d 489 (1970); Alford v. … The incident from which the criminal charge against this defendant stems oc- curred on August 24, 1978.
451 U.S. 939Brief for Respondent in Opposition — Aluminum Co. of America v. Woods Exploration & Producing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent in Opposition · 1972
Phillipsburg National Bank & Trust Co., 399 U.S. 350, 90 S.Ct. 2035 (1970) Walker Process Equipment v. … Phillipsburg National Bank & Trust Co., 399 U.S. 350, 90 S.Ct. 2035 (1970) has held a relevant market to be a much smaller area.
404 U.S. 1047Brief for the Petitioner — Redrup v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner · 1967
Distributors, .14 N.Y. ‘24 399, 252 N.Y.S. 2d 71; 200 N.E. 2d 760 ceesssssscsssssssseccccceceee 20 Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 ....... … (R. 23). | On July 28, 1964, petitioner received a suspended sen- tence (R. 24). ..
386 U.S. 767Opposition — SmithKline Corp. v. Staats
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
AIS beeansisaaseeisstassivescuneabaabebsipntin 12 New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 ....... 19 Porear ©. EFM, Bae Uc. BOR. inccccscdenseviniicnitiatn 19 FOR 'Y. … 'SSee New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 414, 418 (1970); McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras, 372 U.S. 10, 12 (1963). See also Washingion v.
449 U.S. 1038Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aaron Matthew Oleston, Petitioner v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 17, 2022
Oleston 2021 WI App 63, 399 Wis. 2d 323, 964 N.W.2d 549 (Wis. Ct App 2021) 12, 21 State v. Read 165 Vt. 141 (Vt. 1996). State v. Robinson 12, 21 2003 MT 364 (Mont. 2003) State v. … Oleston, 2021 WI App 63, 399 Wis. 2d 323, 964 N.W.2d 549 (Wis. Ct. App 2021). and is reproduced at App.104-113 The circuit court's oral decision is reproduced at App. 113-157.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2023
A at 4 (citing to McQuiggin, 569 U.S. at 386, 399; and Schlup, 513 U.S. at 330). 14 II. … Id., 569 U.S. at 399. 15 Petitioner presented his evidence in a timely state postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brandon Quane Hudson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 25, 2023
Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2005)........................................ 22 United States v. Grossman, 400 F.3d 212 (4th Cir. 2005)........................ 24, 25, 26, 27 United States v. … Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2005), Gonzales was arrested following a traffic accident for driving under the influence.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Langston, Petitioner v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2023
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965)............................................... 6 Southern Union Co. v. … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 31 (1965); see also Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Batson v.
Petitioners Brief — Ross v. Bernhard
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1969
The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on January 29, 1969 and was granted March 24, 1969. This Court’s jurisdiction is based on 28 USC §$1254(1). … This effectively caused the Corporation to pay third parties for advice for which the Corporation had already paid Lehman Brothers (A. 24-25).
396 U.S. 531Brief Amicus Curiae — United States v. Brown
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1965
— No. 399 Unirep Staves oF AMERICA, i oe Petitioner, VS. … ' & . ; © 24 Seu et CONCLUSION .
381 U.S. 437Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 24, 2021
App. 24-25. … Cedarbrook Realty, Inc., 399 A.2d at 377 (quoting Bull v.
Petition — Muzychka v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 399-401 (1977); note 3, supra. … Spano v, New York, 360 U.S. 315, 323-24 (1959).
467 U.S. 1206Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Scott v. Harman
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1952
S., 554, 056, 24 L. … PESO NOLO SEITE AONE INE SERN TET LO Ne PRR eT RE eM Te PN Pa i 24 CONCLUSION. 1.
343 U.S. 965Respondents Brief — Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Petitioner v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Aug 19, 2022
Lupin Ltd., 676 F.3d 1316, 1322–24 (Fed. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.