Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Faust, Director, Arizona Department of Child Safety, Petitioner v. B. K., By Her Next Friend Margaret Tinsley, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 15, 2020

or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class.” … Rule 23(b)(2)’s insistence on a clean, single issue impacting all plaintiffs is a tool in service of the separation of powers.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Statutes: Clayton Act, 15 USC. G12, 66 600). .ccmscusssesninetinmeiiaeameaaal 2 Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, Pub. L. … . © Toi cccssecessomessnssssinaastenssssiam 2 FP UB, § TIED. .cccccoscccescssseressesenseniiniessanmae 7 FP USAG., § TENE -cccsccccescsssscsnsssenstmiiiemamasne 5,7 SD USAC, § AIRED .creccssscsscersessescssensteitiininmaie

Amicus Curiae Brief — Dillon v. Potomac Hospital Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Bryant Air Conditioning Company, 331 EE 10 Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 464 US. 97 (1971) SE 13 14, 16 Dillon v. Potomac Hospital Corp., Memo. Op. EE 13 Dillon yv. … Carl v._ Bryant Air Conditioning Company, 331 N.W.2d 456 (1982). 11 25 GRATT at 10-11, 15.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2023

On January 7, 2021, Rahimi fired multiple shots in the air after his friend’s credit card was declined at a Whataburger restaurant. Id. … Act of March 2, 1867, ch. 170, § 6, 14 Stat. 485, 487.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling, 137 S. Ct. 2285 (2017) (No. 16-1215)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Section 14b of the Act was then amended to reflect these comments.” … The bill as amended, with numerous additional technical, drafting, and style corrections, was ordered introduced as a clean bill.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendrick Jarrell Beaird, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 7, 2026

See Dupree, 57 F.4th at 1280 (Pryor, C.J., concurring) (“Guidelines commentary ordinarily goes through the same noticeand-comment and congressional review procedures as substantive guideline revisions. … Or, to use the language of Kisor, lenity is one of the “traditional tools of construction” that courts must exhaust before deferring to the commentary. 588 U.S. at 575 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio, Petitioner v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 15, 2022

Neither the Termination Act Nor the Safety Act Preempts Anti-Blocking Statutes Congress enacted two statutes that frame the antiblocking discussion: (1) Federal Railroad Safety Act (Safety Act), Pub. … Serv., Locomotive Idling, Air Quality, and Blocked Crossings 2 (March 4, 2022), https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF1 0978.

Amicus Curiae Brief — City News & Novelty, Inc. v. Waukesha

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

See Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 705-706; Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a) and (b). 10 D. … State law similarly allows a court to enter a temporary injunction to restrain an act “[w)hen it appears from a party’s pleading that the party is entitled to judgment” and the commission of the act

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rawl Sales & Processing Co. v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Unlike the NBCWA’s negotiated periodically since 1950, each of which expired after a designated date, the Trusts are perpetual. … The impact of this change is particularly stark with respect to a company which only cleans or transports coal.

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Cleveland, Ohio, Petitioner v. Albert Pickett, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2026

Municipal suppliers must cover the relentlessly increasing costs of ensuring residents with a reliable supply of clean, safe, potable water, meaning that infrastructure must be maintained and upgraded, … See Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300g-1 (National drinking water regulations.).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Timbs v. Indiana, 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-1091)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

As commentators have noted, penalty amounts have “tended to be quite high because legislatures have used a ‘worst case’ mentality in setting them.” Robert O. … With the City’s estimated fine revenue doubling from $400 million to $800 million in a ten-year period, de Blasio sought “answers about what this ‘fine first, ask questions later’ enforcement is doing

Amicus Curiae Brief — Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

ployees for each working day” for 20 or more weeks in a year—to cover any person that has 15 or ore em- plovees “on the payroll and regularly employed during cach working day over the prescribed period … During the course of the Senate debate, two issues re- lated to the definition of “employer” were aired.

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission, Petitioner v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2024

In the middle of that period, I switched to triathlon needing something more challenging to convince myself of my capability in the face of so many claiming I was incapable. … “Testosterone and androgenizing drugs were given in large quantities to East German athletes, creating an unfair advantage clean athletes could not overcome.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Duke University v. Madey

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 122 S.Ct. 1889 (2002)................. 17 Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351 (Fed. … Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 122 S.Ct. 1889, 1898 (2002) (concurring).

Amicus Curiae Brief — FMC Corporation, Petitioner v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 9, 2020

To facilitate the exercise of this authority, CERCLA established a “Superfund” that “may be used to clean up releases of hazardous substances” at sites listed on the NPL. Exxon Corp. v. … EPA determined that “[t]he selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment,” but would be subject to periodic reevaluation. ER 917. 2.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Trades Council

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

tat eceurh ahs sha eee ae ae cee fe 15, 20 Hospital and Service Employees Union, Local 399 (Delta Air Lines), 263 NLRB 996 (1982)...... 15, 16 Internatienal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. … Rev. 1071 (1987).... 27 Comment, The Common-law and Constitutional Status of Antidiscrimination Boycotts, 66 Yale L.J.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seiber v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Haw. 1986), ee ge aire, ae a errr 8 Karam v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 705 A.2d 1221 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. … The Court reached this conclusion even though that property would have been periodically occupied not by the government, but by random members of the beachgoing public: In Loretto we observed that

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Hospital Assn. v. NLRB

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Member facilities range in size from the 15-bed 379th Strategic Hospital at the Wurtsmith Air Force Base to the 960-bed Henry Ford Hospital in downtown Detroit. … The quoted comment concerning the Act’s “in each case” requiremeni does not appear in Davis’ subsequent treatises, which more broadly discuss the Board's rulemaking power.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2021

Fair Housing Act of 1968. … As one commentator observed: “At least some of us who shook our heads over Baker v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Dabit

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

“In Connection With” Plaintiffs’ Own Purchases, Either Before or During the Class Period. … ® See, e.g., In re CIHC, Inc., No. 3-11578, Securities Act Release No. 8455, Exchange Act Release No. 50165, Investment Co.