Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio, Petitioner v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 15, 2022

Neither the Termination Act Nor the Safety Act Preempts Anti-Blocking Statutes Congress enacted two statutes that frame the antiblocking discussion: (1) Federal Railroad Safety Act (Safety Act), Pub. … Serv., Locomotive Idling, Air Quality, and Blocked Crossings 2 (March 4, 2022), https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF1 0978.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Thomas E. Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al., Petitioners v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2021

The most influential antebellum constitutional commentator, Joseph Story, also shared St. George Tucker’s federalist understanding of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. … (cleaned up). Nor could it.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rawl Sales & Processing Co. v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Unlike the NBCWA’s negotiated periodically since 1950, each of which expired after a designated date, the Trusts are perpetual. … The impact of this change is particularly stark with respect to a company which only cleans or transports coal.

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Cleveland, Ohio, Petitioner v. Albert Pickett, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2026

Municipal suppliers must cover the relentlessly increasing costs of ensuring residents with a reliable supply of clean, safe, potable water, meaning that infrastructure must be maintained and upgraded, … See Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300g-1 (National drinking water regulations.).

Amicus Curiae Brief — AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 1, 2020

The TRO thus acted as a general warrant issued to the FTC, acting as investigator and prosecutor. … Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S. 340, 348 (1998) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Arctic Slope Regional Corp. v. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc., 122 S. Ct. 2656 (2002) (No. 01-657)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Serv., 728 F.2d 347 (6th Cir. 1984); the Packers and Stockyard Act, 1921, 7 U.S.C. §§ 181-299; and section 1 of the Act entitled “An Act making appropriations for the Department of Agriculture for the … Rev'd UCC § 9-109(a)(1), comment 1. The creditors were entitled to rely on the expectation that the FCC could not circumvent the Code through such legerdemain.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Medellin v. Dretke

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Il, § 2, cl. 2. 10 and Senate act, in the words of the Supremacy Clause, with the sole “Authority of the United States. … ® International Air Transport Agreement, opened for signature Dec. 7 1944, art.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Garcetti v. Ceballos

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Dept. of Air Force, 39\ F.3d 1377 (Fed. I ceneees 19 Willis v. Dept. of Agric., 141 F.3d 1139 (Fed. Cir. … of Air Force, 391 F.3d 1377, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2004), 20 the public forum, even given the risks that such disclosure would entail.

Amicus Curiae Brief — FMC Corporation, Petitioner v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 9, 2020

To facilitate the exercise of this authority, CERCLA established a “Superfund” that “may be used to clean up releases of hazardous substances” at sites listed on the NPL. Exxon Corp. v. … EPA determined that “[t]he selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment,” but would be subject to periodic reevaluation. ER 917. 2.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Alvarez-Machain

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

No. 2361, 119 U.N.T.S. 3, as amended by the Pro- tocol of Buenos Aires of February 27, 1967, 21 U.S.T. 607, T.I.A.S. … nor profess to act under the treaty.

Amicus Curiae Brief — City News & Novelty, Inc. v. Waukesha

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

See Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 705-706; Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a) and (b). 10 D. … State law similarly allows a court to enter a temporary injunction to restrain an act “[w)hen it appears from a party’s pleading that the party is entitled to judgment” and the commission of the act

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S. A. v. Hearthside Baking Co., Inc., Dba Maurice Lenell Cooky Co

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Ge Detopetence (IFSG) ..... 6. ccc seen eens Antonio Boggiano, The Experience of Latin American States, in INTERNATIONAL UNIFORM LAW IN PRACTICE /LE DROIT UNIFORM INTERNATIONAL DANS LA PRATIQUE [Acts … (the leading U.S. commentator and a leading Singapore commentator) that domestic labels should not con- trol CISG proceedings, see John O.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Trades Council

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

tat eceurh ahs sha eee ae ae cee fe 15, 20 Hospital and Service Employees Union, Local 399 (Delta Air Lines), 263 NLRB 996 (1982)...... 15, 16 Internatienal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. … Rev. 1071 (1987).... 27 Comment, The Common-law and Constitutional Status of Antidiscrimination Boycotts, 66 Yale L.J.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seiber v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Haw. 1986), ee ge aire, ae a errr 8 Karam v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 705 A.2d 1221 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. … The Court reached this conclusion even though that property would have been periodically occupied not by the government, but by random members of the beachgoing public: In Loretto we observed that

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo ex rel. Situated, 135 S. Ct. 2806 (2015) (No. 14-1146)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

IT], §2.. ... ~ es ae Cee Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29U.S.C.§ 20letseq ...... 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 15 Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2072(6) .. 8, 13, 22 lowa Wage Payment Collection Law (IWPCL … to complete all donning/doffing, cleaning, and walking activities.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2021

Fair Housing Act of 1968. … As one commentator observed: “At least some of us who shook our heads over Baker v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Air, Inc., 157 F.3d 744 (9th Cir. 1998), modified in other respects, 196 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 1999) _. 10 Beaird v. … 26 Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1210] ef seg. .............. 10, 27 Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seg. ............... 11, 18 Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

OL FM AIRE rs OE 4 West River Bridge Co. v. Dix, a ee I iia, sss tsccdtcdansecadseieciibboesassionaiees 6 Yates v. Milwaukee, 77 U.S. … It was in this context that a commentator could confidently assert that “an act which came with- in the scope of tne State police power could not be termed a depriva- tion of property.”23 The Court

Amicus Curiae Brief — Martins Beach 1, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Surfrider Foundation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2018

Arkansas Game concerned whether periodic flooding attributed to a public works project was a taking. … which implement the Coastal Act in that jurisdiction.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Solorio v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

Air Force regulation prohibiting the wearing of any headgear while indoors. … nor may any person who has acted for the defense act ‘é 3a later in the same case for the prosecution.’’ The meaning of the phrase “person who has acted for the defense’’ is vital.