Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.55s
Jurisdictional Statement — Hamilton v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1982
Brattoe- TOLEd”’ 24 215° (i963 _ California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 Ot. 30,26 L.Ed. 2d 1489 (1970) S, Ose, ae 83 Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. … Green, supra 399 U.S. at 158.
459 U.S. 1011Application — Eric Drake, Applicant v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Application · Nov 10, 2025
But on 09/29/24, Applicant declined the State’s offer. App.22, L 22-23. … ” (14) On 09/03/24 Judge Snipes authorized Applicant as a party to his email chain. On 09/13/24, Judge Snipes emailed Administrative Judge Raymond Wheless.
Reply Brief — Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Maine People's Alliance (No. 06-1540)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
Honeywell Int'l, Inc.. 399 F.3d 248 (3d Cir.), cert. denied. 545 U.S. 1129 I ais eetaaainicteds acntaeiiocaben cae ae 1, 2,9 LaFleur v. Whitman, 300 F.3d 256 (2d Cir. … Org., 399 F.3d at 259-61 (violations of state standards); Cox v.
Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1986
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893 (1970), the Supreme Court held that a jury of six persons is constitutional but did not overrule Thompson on the ex post facto issue. … In his jurisdictional statement, the Petitioner alleges that the indictment was vague and should have been dismissed (Jurisdictional Statement, pp. 24-25).
474 U.S. 1098Reply Brief — Robert Angel Perez, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 25, 2020
California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967). … Id. at 24.
Opposition Brief — Tarala v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Illinois, 399 U.S. 244, 90 S. Ct. 2018, 2023 (1970) Wasman v. United States, 466 U.S. 559, 104 &. Ct. 3217, 3220 (1984). … Illinois, 399 U.S. 244, 90 &. Ct. 2016, 2023 (1970).
484 U.S. 1062Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Owen Marlon Alexander, Petitioner v. Andreea Gleeson, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 13, 2025
24. … -90128jm, 02-24-90129-jm, and 02-24-90130jm.
Opposition — Household Finance Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Phillipsburg National Bank. supra, 399 U.S. at 360-361. … Exh. 8 Tables 24, 28.
444 U.S. 1044Reply Brief — Diontai Moore, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 10, 2025
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................. 4 Williams v. United States, 2025 WL 1603600 (U.S. … United States, No. 24-6517 (U.S. May 19, 2025).
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 27, 1999
Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before January 24, 2000. … Issued: August 24, 1999. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 99-22344 Filed 8-26-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
64 FR 46949International Trade CommissionRespondents Brief — Lewis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1996
Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (19700 . . 24 Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) ....... 3, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 31 Blanton v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), and Blanton v.
518 U.S. 322Safety Zone: Pier 39 Fireworks Display, San Francisco, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 23, 2018
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399-7443 or email at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zones on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: March 19, 2018. Anthony J.
83 FR 12665Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 26, 2021
Latasha Jackson, No. 2015CA-399, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, State of Louisiana, Disposition handed down on July 31, 2015. Mark Anthony Jenkins v. … Latasha Jackson, No. 2015CA-399, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, State of Louisiana; rehearing denied Sept. 2, 2015. Mark Anthony Jenkins, Sr. v.
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 1998
These violations of Parts 385 and 390-399 of this subchapter constitute a middle range of violations. … A driver placed out of service for 24 hours for violating the alcohol prohibitions of 49 CFR 392.5(a) or (b) who drives during that period is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $2,750 for each violation
63 FR 12413Transportation DepartmentFederal Highway AdministrationOpinion — Serfass v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1975
Sisson, 399 U. 8. 267, 307- 7 Title 18 U. S. C. § 3731 (1964 ed., Supp. … Sisson, 399 U. S. 267, 303 (1971).
420 U.S. 377Respondents Brief — McGautha v. California
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1971
Florida, 399 U. … Florida, 399 U.
402 U.S. 183Petitioners Brief — Ballew v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1978
Minnesota, 399 U.S. 524 (1970) ............ 19 Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Dallas, 390 UB. GIG CIDER) 2c cccecssesceseeeeeeeea 21 Jacobellis v. … possibility is found to exist, the Court is urged to find that the motion picture film, in the circumstances in which it was shown, cannot, as a matter of applicable constitutional law, be held obscene. 24
435 U.S. 223Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Daly v. Daly
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
(Section 399 of the Code of Crimina#Pro- cedure). Only bribery, not extortion, was proved. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24).
400 U.S. 878Record and brief — The United States, Appellants, vs. Francisco Pico and al
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1855
No. 399.—Commissioner Docket No. 602. Tue Unirep STATES. … No. 399. THe UNITED STATES.
Safety Zone; Waters Surrounding Berth 7 at the Port of Oakland, San Francisco Bay, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 22, 2009
DATES: This rule is effective from noon on April 14, 2009, through 11:59 p.m. on April 24, 2009. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-16 or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. (d) Effective period .
74 FR 18293Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.