Documents

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Kentucky: Adoption of General Conformity Regulations

Federal Register · Rule · Jul 27, 1998

All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). D.

Air Quality Plans; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department; Source-Specific SIP Revision

Federal Register · Rule · Dec 16, 2024

Air Act (CAA or “Act”). … Public Comments The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, no comments were submitted on our proposal. III.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Montana; Libby 1997 Annual PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 6, 2022

“State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992; and 3. … Has the State met all applicable requirements under section 110 and part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and have those requirements been fully approved?

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota

Federal Register · Rule · Jul 19, 2007

What Comments Were Received? One comment from the Minnesota PCA was received during the comment period. … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; (Hancock and Waldo Counties Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets)

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 1, 1997

This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.

Air Plan Approval; California; San Joaquin Valley 1-Hour Ozone Area; Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 23, 2025

Part D of the Clean Air Act establishes the plan requirements for nonattainment areas. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.

Petition — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

Whether the Clean Air Act authorizes the Admin- istrator of the U. … STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED The Clean Air Act amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857a-j (the “Clean Air Act’’).

Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County and Ventura County Air Pollution Control Districts

Federal Register · Rule · Dec 19, 2017

We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: These rules will be effective on January 18, 2018. … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, and South Coast Air Quality Management District

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 15, 2000

We are proposing action on local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 , 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994).

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Revised Regulations and Source-Specific Reasonably Available Control Technology Plans Controlling Volatile Organic Compound Emissions and Emission Statement Requirements

Federal Register · Rule · Mar 10, 1998

This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.

Appendix — West Virginia ex rel. Air Pollution Control Commission v. Gorsuch

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982

Section 110(a) (2) (A) of the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations require that a compliance schedule provide for attainment of the secondary standard within a reasonable period of time. … Section 110(a) (2) (A) of the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations require that a compliance schedule pro- vide for attainment of a secondary NAAQS within a reason- able period of time.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2011

pollution control agency “for all purposes” of the Clean Air Act. … to promulgate rules, and establish standards and guidelines, to ensure that the state complies with the provisions of the Federal Clean Air Act.

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Proposed Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions From Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Dec 6, 1994

Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 was enacted to help reduce the increasing levels of nationwide air toxics emissions. … Air Act, for that pollutant.

Petition for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standard

Federal Register · Notice · May 30, 2023

(k) Air nozzles shall be guarded to eliminate the possibility of incidental contact, which could create mechanical damage to the air nozzles during the clothes cleaning process. … (m) The air receiver tank supplying air to the manifold system will be of sufficient volume to permit no less than 20 seconds of continuous cleaning time.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; Denver Early Action Compact Ozone Plan, Attainment Demonstration of the 8-hour Ozone Standard, and Approval of Related Revisions

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 17, 2005

This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 16, 2005. … or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.

Record and brief — Am. Chemistry Council v. Envtl. Prot. Agency

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2013

See also sections 161, 162, and 167 of the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act clearly calls for a detailed and extensive air quality impact assessment.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Rhode Island Non-CTG RACT

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 7, 1995

Background Under the pre-amended Clean Air Act (i.e., the Clean Air Act before the enactment of the amendments of November 15, 1990), ozone nonattainment areas were required to adopt RACT rules for … Section 193, the General Savings Clause, of the Clean Air Act states that no control requirement adopted prior to the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 may be modified after enactment unless

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; GSA Central and West Heating Plants

Federal Register · Rule · May 2, 1995

This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Revisions to the Nevada State Implementation Plan; Updated Statutory and Regulatory Provisions; Rescissions

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 9, 2008

EPA is taking this action under the Clean Air Act obligation to take action on submittals of revisions to state implementation plans. … Public Comments EPA's December 14, 2007 proposed rule provided a 30-day public comment period. No comments were submitted. III.

Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations; Consistency Update for California

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 23, 2007

”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (“the Act”). … Public Comments EPA's proposed actions provided 30-day public comment periods. During these periods, we received no comments on the proposed actions. III.