Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Revised Regulations and Source-Specific Reasonably Available Control Technology Plans Controlling Volatile Organic Compound Emissions and Emission Statement Requirements

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[NH-9-1-5823a; A-1-FRL-5969-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

New Hampshire; Revised Regulations and Source-Specific Reasonably

Available Control Technology Plans Controlling Volatile Organic

Compound Emissions and Emission Statement Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions

submitted by the State of New Hampshire. This action is being taken

under the Clean Air Act. EPA is approving the revisions to the New

Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of New

Hampshire on December 21, 1992, July 10, 1995, June 28, 1996, October,

24, 1996 and December 9, 1996. These SIP revisions consist of source

specific VOC RACT determinations for L.W. Packard and Company, Textile

Tapes Corporation, and Kalwall Corporation. They also consist of

revisions to the State's volatile organic compound (VOC) regulations in

Chapter Env-A 1204 (but not including section 1204.06), certain testing

and monitoring requirements in Chapter Env-A 800, and recordkeeping and

reporting requirements in Chapter Env-A 900, all of which require the

implementation of

[[Page 11601]]

reasonably available control technology (RACT) for certain sources of

volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as required by the Clean Air Act.

These regulations are applicable in the entire State of New Hampshire

and are required pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b)(1)(B) of the

Clean Air Act. EPA has evaluated the RACT plans and the revisions of

the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. EPA is also finalizing a limited

approval on section Env-A 1204.27.

DATES: This action will become effective May 11, 1998, unless EPA

receives relevant adverse comment on the parallel notice of proposed

rulemaking by April 9, 1998. Should the agency receive such comments,

it will timely publish a timely document withdrawing this rule.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Deputy Director,

Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAA), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Bldg., Boston, MA 02203.

Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support document are

available for public inspection during normal business hours, by

appointment at the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston,

MA and Air Resources Division, Department of Environmental Services, 64

North Main Street, Caller Box 2033, Concord, NH 03302-2033.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne Cosgrove, (617) 565-9451.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

Under the pre-amended Clean Air Act, ozone nonattainment areas were

required to adopt reasonably available control technology (RACT) rules

for sources of VOC emissions. EPA issued three sets of control

technique guidelines (CTGs) documents, establishing a ``presumptive

norm'' for RACT for various categories of VOC sources. The three sets

of CTGs were (1) Group I--issued before January 1978 (15 CTGs); (2)

Group II--issued in 1978 (9 CTGs); and (3) Group III--issued in the

early 1980's (5 CTGs). Those sources not covered by a CTG were called

non-CTG sources. EPA determined that the area's SIP-approved attainment

date established which RACT rules the area needed to adopt and

implement. Under section 172(a)(1), ozone nonattainment areas were

generally required to attain the ozone standard by December 31, 1982.

Those areas that submitted an attainment demonstration projecting

attainment by that date were required to adopt RACT for sources covered

by the Group I and II CTGs. Those areas that sought an extension of the

attainment date under section 172(a)(2) to as late as December 31, 1987

were required to adopt RACT for all CTG sources and for all major

(i.e., 100 ton per year or more of VOC emissions) non-CTG sources.

Section 182(b)(2) of the amended Act requires States to adopt RACT

rules for all areas designated nonattainment for ozone and classified

as moderate or above. There are three parts to the section 182(b)(2)

RACT requirement: (1) RACT for sources covered by an existing CTG--

i.e., a CTG issued prior to the enactment of the CAAA of 1990; (2) RACT

for sources covered by a post-enactment CTG; and (3) all major sources

not covered by a CTG. This RACT requirement applies to nonattainment

areas that previously were exempt from certain RACT requirements and

requirements and requires them to ``catchup'' to those nonattainment

areas that became subject to those requirements during an earlier

period. In addition, it requires newly designated ozone nonattainment

areas to adopt RACT rules consistent with those for previously

designated nonattainment areas.

Portions of New Hampshire are classified as marginal and serious

nonattainment areas for ozone.1 In addition, New Hampshire

is located in the northeast ozone transport region that was statutorily

created by section 184 of the CAA. Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the amended

Act requires all states in an Ozone Transport Region (OTR) to adopt the

RACT provisions for all sources covered by a CTG document issued by EPA

before or after enactment of the CAAA of 1990. Section 184(b)(2)

mandates that all states in the OTR subject 50 ton per year and greater

VOC sources to those requirements that would be applicable to major

stationary sources in a moderate nonattainment area.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ These areas were designated as nonattainment prior to

enactment of the amended Act. They retained their designation of

nonattainment and were classified by operation of law pursuant to

Sections 107(d) and 181(a) upon enactment of the amendments. See 56

FR 56694.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

To meet the RACT catch-up requirement, New Hampshire needed to

submit a RACT rule for an external floating roof VOC storage category.

In addition, the major source definition for serious areas and areas

designated as part of an OTR has been lowered under the amended Act to

sources that emit greater than 50 tons per year of VOC. Therefore, the

State was required to adopt RACT rules for all sources that exceed this

cut-off. New Hampshire was also required to reduce the applicability

level for certain coating sources from 100 tons per year of VOC to 10

tons per year, as recommended in the CTGs. These sources include: can

coating; paper fabric, film and foil coating; vinyl and urethane

substrate coating; metal furniture coating; and magnet wire insulation

coating.

VOCs contribute to the production of ground level ozone and smog.

New Hampshire's rules were adopted as part of an effort to achieve the

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This Final

Rule discusses EPA's evaluation and final action for New Hampshire's

amendments to the Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204 regulations, and source

specific VOC RACT Orders submitted pursuant to Env-A

1204.27.

II. State Submittals

A. Parts Env-A 800, 900, and 1204

On June 28, 1996, New Hampshire Air Resources Division (ARD)

submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The

revision consists of amendments to Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204 of the

New Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution. The

revision consists of changes made pursuant to the requirements of

Sec. 182(b)(2) of the Act to the following New Hampshire Regulations

for the Abatement of Air Pollution:

Part Env-A 803: VOC testing;

Part Env-A 804 Capture Efficiency;

Part Env-A 901: Recordkeeping and Reporting by Sources;

Part Env-A 1204: Stationary Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds

(VOCs), including new sections controlling VOC emissions from the

coating of wood furniture, burial caskets and gunstock; and the coating

of plastic parts. In Env-A 1204.03, New Hampshire revised the

definition of exempt VOC to include parachlorobenzotriflouride,

perchloroethylene, acetone, and volatile methyl siloxanes.

On November 21, 1997, New Hampshire submitted a letter to EPA

requesting withdrawal of section Env-A 1204.06 from the SIP package

pursuant to EPA's request. This section contains provisions for

``equivalent substitute control techniques.'' EPA requested that New

Hampshire withdraw this section from the SIP because it does not

provide for EPA approval of the equivalent substitute control

techniques chosen.

On December 21, 1992, New Hampshire submitted a SIP revision to EPA

consisting of the amendments to Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204 of the New

Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution. As part of this

SIP revision, NH revised its Part Env-A 800, 900, and 1204 rules to

comply with

[[Page 11602]]

the requirements of reasonably available control technology (RACT)

provisions for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), as required by

Section 182(b)(2) and Section 184(a) and (b) of the Clean Air Act. In

response to these CAA requirements, New Hampshire revised its rules to

include:

1. The addition of an external floating roof VOC storage category.

2. The addition of a regulation requiring RACT for non-CTG sources

exceeding 50 tons per year.

3. The adoption of the ``theoretical potential emissions''

definition used to determine RACT applicability for coating and

printing sources.

4. The incorporation of lower applicability cutpoints for coating

source emissions, consistent with EPA guidance.

5. The addition of urethane substrates in the vinyl substrate

coating category.

6. Revisions to the compliance schedule section of the rules to

facilitate compliance for all applicable VOC sources by the statutory

deadline of May, 1995.

7. Revisions to include additional NOX and VOC

recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

8. Various revisions to the VOC rules to make them fully consistent

with EPA guidance.

In addition to the VOC regulations in Part Env-A 800, 900 and 1204,

New Hampshire submitted source specific VOC RACT determination for L.W.

Packard & Company on July 10, 1995 which covers processes subject to

the miscellaneous VOC RACT provisions of Part Env-A 1204. On October

24, 1996, New Hampshire submitted source specific VOC RACT

determination for Kalwall Corporation in Manchester, NH which covers

processes subject to the VOC RACT provisions of Part Env-A 1204. On

December 9, 1996, New Hampshire submitted source specific VOC RACT

determination for Textile Tapes in Gonic, NH.

EPA's review of the SIP submittal indicates that New Hampshire has

addressed the applicable RACT requirements and deficiencies in the

existing VOC regulations that were identified by EPA in its letters of

October 31, 1991, March 10, 1992, and June 24, 1992. New Hampshire's

regulation and EPA's evaluation are detailed in the following

memoranda: Technical Support Document--New Hampshire SIP Revision

Concerning Amendments to Part Env-A 800, 900, and 1204 of the New

Hampshire Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution, July 7, 1993

and Amendment to the TSD-New Hampshire VOC RACT SIP Revisions. Copies

of these documents are available, upon request, from the EPA Regional

Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.

B. Emission Statement Requirements

The CAA requires states to submit SIP revisions by November 15,

1992 requiring that all sources of VOC and NOX emissions

submit emission statements on an annual basis beginning in 1993 for the

calendar year 1992. EPA proposed a limited approval/limited disapproval

of the emission statement provisions in a separate Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking (NPR) published on September 20, 1994, 59 FR 48195. In that

NPR, EPA identified provisions in New Hampshire's regulations which

were inconsistent with EPA guidance. New Hampshire's submittal of June

28, 1996 addresses the deficiencies identified in the September 20,

1994 NPR.

C. VOC RACT for L.W. Packard in Ashland

On July 10, 1995, New Hampshire submitted a VOC RACT Order for L.W.

Packard as a SIP revision. L.W. Packard and Company of manufactures

fine woolen cloth at its Ashland, New Hampshire facility. VOC are

emitted primarily from the carding oil process and the wet finishing

and dyeing process. The coating processes are subject to section Env-A

1024.27, ``Emission Standards and Control Options for Miscellaneous and

Multicategory Stationary VOC Sources.'' Order number ARD-94-001 defines

VOC RACT for L.W. Packard's processes. The Order requires L.W. Packard

to use a low VOC carding oil with a maximum VOC content of 0.05 lbs

VOC/gallon. The Order also limits formic acid emissions, and requires

L.W. Packard to install at least one pressurized dye vessel. The Order

also sets recordkeeping and reporting requirements. New Hampshire held

a public hearing on April 11, 1995. The final Order was issued on May

5, 1995.

D. VOC RACT for Textile Tapes Corporation in Gonic

On December 9, 1996, New Hampshire submitted a VOC RACT Order for

Textile Tapes Corporation in Gonic. Textile Tapes applies surface

coatings on fabrics using the knife coating process. The facility

operates three coating lines. Order number ARD-96-001 defines VOC RACT

for all coatings at Textile Tapes except for the ``5000 series

adhesive'' to comply with the provisions of Part Env-A 1204.10,

Applicability Criteria and Compliance Standards for Coating of Paper,

Fabric, Film and Foil Substrates which limits the emission rate of VOC

at all times to 2.9 lb VOC/gallon of coating, as applied, excluding

water and exempt VOC. For the coating described as ``5000 series

adhesive,'' the Order requires the facility to increase the solids

content from 33% by weight to 40% by weight and to limit the VOC

emission rate to 4.7 lb VOC/gallon of coating, as applied, less water

and exempt compounds. New Hampshire held a public hearing on February

16, 1996. The final Order was issued on October 4, 1996.

E. VOC RACT for Kalwall in Manchester

On October 24, 1996, New Hampshire submitted a VOC RACT Order for

Kalwall Corporation in Manchester. Kalwall Corporation of Manchester,

New Hampshire produces building panels used in architectural and light

construction applications. Coatings containing VOC are applied to the

panels. Order number ARD-95-010 defines VOC RACT for Kalwall's coating

processes. The order sets VOC emission limits for the three coating

process and requires Kalwall to improve transfer efficiency of one

coating process. The Order also sets recordkeeping and reporting

requirements. New Hampshire held a public hearing on February 16, 1996.

The final Order was issued on September 10, 1996.

F. Env-A 1204.27 Applicability Criteria and Compliance Options for

Miscellaneous and Multicategory Stationary VOC Sources

For major non-CTG sources of VOCs, the addition of this section

sets forth both presumptive RACT norms and processes by which RACT can

be established for those sources that cannot meet the presumptive

norms. However, Section 182(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act requires that a

SIP revision be submitted by November 15, 1992 including ``provisions

to require the implementation of reasonably available control

technology.'' In addition, the necessary SIP revision is required to

``provide for the implementation of the required measures as

expeditiously as practicable but no later than May 31, 1995.'' Since

the first four control options of Env-A 1204.27(d) define presumptive

norms for RACT, and are consistent with EPA's Model VOC RACT Rules for

other facilities that emit volatile organic compounds, that portion of

the regulation meets the requirements of Section 182 and is approvable.

However, since control option 5 describes a process by which RACT can

be defined but does not specifically define RACT for each source to

which such options apply, that portion of the rule is not fully

[[Page 11603]]

approvable. Therefore, EPA is only granting a limited approval of Env-A

1204.27. To receive full approval, New Hampshire will need to define

explicitly, and have approved by EPA, RACT for all of those sources

which do not conform to the presumptive RACT options outlined in the

regulation. New Hampshire will need to define RACT for the following

sources before EPA will grant full approval: Harvard Industries, New

Filcas of America Inc., Sturm Ruger Inc., and Anheuser Busch.

III. Final Action

EPA review of the regulations in Part Env-A 800, 900, and 1204

(except for Env-A 1204.27 and 1204.06) indicates that New Hampshire has

sufficiently defined the VOC RACT and emission statement requirements.

EPA review of the miscellaneous VOC RACT for L.W. Packard, Textile

Tapes Corporation, and Kalwall Corporation in Manchester, indicates

that New Hampshire has sufficiently defined the VOC RACT requirements

for these facilities. Therefore EPA is approving Part Env-A 800, 900,

and 1204 (except 1204.06), and the source specific VOC RACT Order #ARD-

95-010 for Kalwall in Manchester, VOC RACT Order #ARD-96-001 for

Textile Tapes Corporation, and VOC RACT Order #ARD-94-001 for L.W.

Packard. As noted above, New Hampshire withdrew Env-A 1204.06 from its

SIP submittal. Therefore, this action does not approve that section as

part of the SIP.

EPA has evaluated New Hampshire's submittal for consistency with

the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA has determined that the

changes made to Part Env-A 800, Part Env-A 900 and Part Env-A 1204,

except for Env-A 1204.06 and 1204.27 of New Hampshire's Regulations

Controlling Air Pollution meet the requirements of the Act. Therefore,

EPA is approving under Section 110(k)(3) those changes. However, EPA

has determined that Env-A 1204.27 does not meet all of the Act's

requirements for the reasons described above. EPA believes that

approval of the submitted rule will strengthen the SIP but because of

the above-mentioned deficiencies, the rule does not meet the

requirements of Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA. In light of such

deficiencies, EPA cannot grant full approval of this rule under section

110(k)(3) and Part D. However, EPA may grant a limited approval of the

submitted rule under Section 110(k)(3) and EPA's authority pursuant to

Section 301(a) to adopt regulations necessary to further air quality by

strengthening the SIP. The approval is limited due to the fact that

this rule does not meet the requirement of Section 182(b)(2) because of

the deficiencies noted above. Thus, in order to strengthen the SIP, EPA

is taking action on New Hampshire's submitted Section Env-A 1204.27 as

a limited approval under Section 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the CAA.

EPA's evaluation of all the submitted regulations is detailed in

the Technical Support Document. Copies of that document are available,

upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES

section of this action. Interested parties may participate in the

Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA

Regional office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this action.

EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal

Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be

effective May 11, 1998, without further notice, unless, the agency

receives relevant adverse comments by April 9, 1998, or the parallel

notice of proposed rulemaking.

If the EPA receives such comments, it will publish a document

informing the public that this rule did not take effect. All public

comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If

no such comments are received, the public is advised that this action

will be effective on May 11, 1998.

Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or

allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for

revision to any State implementation plan. Each request for revision to

the State implementation plan shall be considered separately in light

of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in

relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature

by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the

Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a

July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for

Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted this regulatory action from review under Executive Order

12866.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA

must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of

any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.

Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small

entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,

and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than

50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the

Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve

requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the

Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the

Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on

any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the

Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility

analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base

its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S.

EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under Sections 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA

must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or

final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated

costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to

the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA

must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative

that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan

for informing and advising any small governments that may be

significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not

include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100

million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-

existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes

[[Page 11604]]

no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local,

or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this

action.

D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office

Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report

containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the

General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's

Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5

U.S.C. 804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for

judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 11, 1998. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule

does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such

rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings

to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) EPA encourages

interested parties to comment in response to the proposed rule rather

than petition for judicial review, unless the objection arises after

the comment period allowed for in the proposal.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen

dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: February 9, 1998.

John P. DeVillars,

Regional Administrator, Region I.

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations

is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart EE--New Hampshire

2. Section 52.1520 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(51) to read

as follows:

Sec. 52.1520 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(51) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the

New Hampshire Air Resources Division on December 9, 1996, June 28,

1996, October 24, 1996, and July 10, 1995.

(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letters from the New Hampshire

Air Resources Division dated December 9, 1996, June 28, 1996, October

24, 1996, July 10, 1995 and December 21, 1992 submitting revisions to

the New Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP), and a letter dated

November 21, 1997 withdrawing Env-A 1204.06 from the SIP submittal.

(B) Regulations Part Env-A 801 ``Purpose;'' Part Env-A 802

``Testing and Monitoring for Stationary Sources: General

Requirements;'' Part Env-A 902 ``Malfunctions and Breakdowns of Air

Pollution Control Equipment;'' and Part Env-A 903 ``Compliance

Schedules'' all effective November 15, 1992.

(C) Regulations Part Env-A 803 ``VOC Testing;'' Part Env-A 804

``Capture Efficiency;'' Sections Env-A 901.01 through 901.05, 901.08

and 901.09 of Part Env-A 901 ``Recordkeeping and Reporting by

Sources;'' and Part Env-A 1204 ``Stationary Sources of Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOCs) (except 1204.06),'' all effective on August 31, 1995.

(D) New Hampshire VOC RACT Order ARD-94-001, concerning L.W.

Packard, effective May 5, 1995.

(E) New Hampshire VOC RACT Order ARD-95-010, concerning Kalwall in

Manchester, NH, effective September 10, 1996.

(F) New Hampshire VOC RACT Order ARD-96-001, concerning Textile

Tapes Corporation, NH, effective October 4, 1996.

3. In Sec. 52.1525 Table 52.1525 is amended by adding new entries

in numerical order to existing state citations ``Part Env-A 801; Part

Env-A 802; Part Env-A 803; Part Env-A 804; Part Env-A 805; Part Env-A

806; Part Env-A 807; Part Env-A 901, sections Env-A 901.01 through

901.05, 901.08 and 901.09; Part Env-A 902; Part Env-A 903; Part Env-A

1204 (except 1204.06);'' ``Order ARD-94-001,'' ``Order ARD-95-010,''

and ``Order ARD-96-001'' to read as follows:

Sec. 52.1525--EPA--approved New Hampshire state regulations.

* * * * *

Table 52.1525.--EPA--Approved Rules and Regulations--New Hampshire

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State citation Date adopted by Date approved by Federal Register

Title/subject chapter State EPA citation 52.1520 Comments

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *

Purpose......................... CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Env-A 801. monitoring

procedures.

Testing and Monitoring for CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Stationary Sources: General Env-A 802. monitoring

Requirements. procedures.

VOC Testing..................... CH air 800, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Env-A 803. monitoring

procedures.

Capture Efficiency.............. CH air 800, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Env-A 804. monitoring

procedures.

[[Page 11605]]

Continuous Emission Monitoring.. CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Env-A 805. monitoring

procedures.

Testing for Diesel Engines and CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Motor Vehicles. Env-A 806. monitoring

procedures.

Approval of Alternate Methods... CH air 800, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds testing and

Env-A 807. monitoring

procedures.

* * * * * * *

Recordkeeping and Reporting by CH air 900, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping

Sources. Env-A 901, and reporting

sections 901.01, requirements.

901.03, 901.09.

Recordkeeping and Reporting by CH air 900, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping

Sources. Env-A 901, and reporting

sections 901.02, requirements.

901.04, 901.05,

and 901.08.

Malfunctions and Breakdowns of CH air 900, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping

Air Pollution Control Equipment. Env-A 902. and reporting

requirements.

Compliance Schedules............ CH air 900, Part November 13, 1992. 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds recordkeeping

Env-A 903. and reporting

requirements.

* * * * * * *

Stationary Sources of Volatile CH air 1204, Part August 21, 1995... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) Adds VOC RACT

Organic Compounds. Env-A 1204 requirements.

(except 1204.06). Limited approval

only of Env-A

1204.27.

Source Specific Order........... Order ARD-94-001.. May 5, 1995....... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) VOC RACT for L.W.

Packard.

* * * * * * *

Source Specific Order........... Order ARD-95-010.. September 10, 1996 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) VOC RACT for Kalwall,

Manchester.

Source Specific Order........... Order ARD-96-001.. October 4, 1996... 3-10-98........... 63 FR 11600....... c(51) VOC RACT for Textile

Tapes.

* * * * * * *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 98-5316 Filed 3-9-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P