Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; GSA Central and West Heating Plants

Federal RegisterMay 2, 1995

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[DC23-1-6790a; FRL-5181-2]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

District of Columbia; GSA Central and West Heating Plants

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State implementation plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the District of Columbia. This revision will limit air

pollution from two steam-generating facilities located in the District

of Columbia. The intended effect of this action is to approve a permit-

to-operate issued by the District of Columbia to General Services

Administration for its Central and West Heating Plants. This action is

being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This final rule is effective July 3, 1995, unless notice is

received on or before June 1, 1995, that adverse or critical comments

will be submitted. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will

be published in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Marcia L. Spink, Associate

Director, Air Programs (3AT00), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for

public inspection during normal business hours at the Air, Radiation,

and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,

841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; the Air and

Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; and District of

Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, 2100 Martin

Luther King Ave, S.E., Washington, DC 20020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David J. Campbell, Technical

Assessment Section (3AT22), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107,

phone: (215) 597-9781.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 24, 1994, the District of

[[Page 21454]] Columbia submitted a request that EPA approve a revision

to the District of Columbia SIP. The revision consists of a September

8, 1994 operating permit issued by the District of Columbia to GSA for

its Central and West Heating Plants. The permit establishes general

operating procedures at GSA's Central Heating Plant (CHP) and West

Heating Plant (WHP), including the exclusive combustion of natural gas

(with the provision for the combustion of low-sulfur oil in the event

of a natural gas service interruption).

The permit also defines annual and short-term emission limitations

for SO2, particulate matter (PM-10), nitrogen oxides (NOX),

volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and carbon monoxide (CO) for both of

the plants. Since this permit establishes more stringent emission

limitations than the existing SIP or applicable new source performance

standards (NSPS), the ambient air quality with respect to each of the

criteria pollutants mentioned above shall be significantly improved.

The permit-to-operate issued to GSA promotes continued maintenance

of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for SO2, PM-

10, and NOX in the areas surrounding the CHP and WHP. The District

of Columbia is currently designated as nonattainment for the NAAQS for

CO. Although the emissions limits established in the permit for CO will

not affect the attainment status of the District, they do provide for

CO emissions reductions at these two facilities which were previously

uncontrolled for CO. The permit also regulates particulate matter and

VOC emissions.

In order to achieve these emission reductions, GSA is restricted by

its September 8, 1994 operating permit to the combustion of natural

gas. The District restricted the fuel capabilities at the two

facilities primarily to minimize SO2 emissions from the Plants.

Modeling analyses performed in 1990 as part the permitting process for

GSA's proposed refurbishment of various boilers at CHP and WHP

indicated that elevated ambient concentrations of SO2 were

predicted for the areas immediately surrounding the two facilities when

the Plants burned coal under typical winter day conditions.

Along with the restrictions on fuel usage, the permit limits the

hourly and annual emissions of various pollutants from the facilities.

The permit drastically reduces SO2 emissions from the plant to the

point where such emissions present negligible potential for impact on

the surrounding areas. For instance, the average annual SO2

emissions from CHP and WHP were 523 and 626 tons per year,

respectively, during the period of 1980 to 1990, inclusive. The current

permit-to-operate restricts annual SO2 emissions to 4 tons per

year at CHP and 5 tons per year at WHP. This is an average overall

reduction of 1140 tons per year of SO2 emissions in the vicinity

of the two facilities. Annual emissions of PM-10, NOX, CO, and

VOCs from the two plants are restricted to a degree that further limits

the potential for violation of the relevant annual NAAQS in the

vicinity of these facilities.

The operating permit is also protective of the short-term NAAQS.

For each of the pollutants discussed above, hourly emission limitations

are established in the permit. These hourly emission limits are, in

every instance, as stringent or more restrictive than the applicable

limits in the District's existing SIP or new source performance

standards (NSPS) limits.

As mentioned above, the operating permit requires the combustion of

natural gas at all times at GSA's CHP and WHP. However, there is a

provision for the use of No. 2 ``on-road diesel'' with a maximum sulfur

content of five hundredths weight percent (0.05%wt) during periods

of service interruptions by the supplier. It should be noted that GSA

must comply with its annual and short-term emission rates regardless of

the fuel it uses. In the event of a service interruption, the permit

contains explicit instructions for the notification of the District of

this event and recordation of pertinent information.

The permit also requires GSA to report an extensive amount of

information to ensure continuous compliance with the annual and short-

term emission limits. The principal means for compliance determination

is the use of continuous emissions monitoring data collected at the

facilities. The District relies primarily on the procedures established

in 40 CFR part 60 for monitor operation and data quality assurance.

Daily emissions reports that provide hourly emission rates for

SO2, NOX, VOCs, and CO are to be prepared by GSA. GSA must

also submit a quarterly report documenting the hourly status of each

boiler at CHP and WHP including; hours of service, types and quantities

of fuel combusted, fuel composition and heat content, service

interruptions, and total tons of SO2, NOX, PM-10, VOCs, and

CO emitted on a monthly basis and as part of a rolling, 12-month annual

average. A monthly report is to be prepared demonstrating GSA's

maintenance of the NAAQS for SO2 in the vicinity of the two

facilities. Sulfur-in-fuel reports are due each month detailing

specific information about the fuel oil, if any, that was burned during

the month. The level of reporting detailed above provides adequate

assurances that the compliance status of GSA can be quickly and

accurately tracked at all times.

EPA Evaluation

EPA has evaluated the District of Columbia's SIP revision request

and concluded the following: (1) The operational and emission

limitations imposed on GSA's Central and West Heating Plants adequately

promote continued maintenance of the NAAQS; (2) the operational and

emission limitations are clearly enforceable; and (3) the applicable

requirements of CFR part 51 have been met. A more detailed evaluation

is provided in the Technical Support Document for this action which is

available upon request from the EPA Region III office listed in the

ADDRESSES section of this document.

EPA is approving this SIP revision without prior proposal because

the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates

no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal

Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be

effective July 3, 1995, unless, by June 1, 1995, adverse or critical

comments are received.

If EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn before

the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will withdraw

the final action. All public comments received will then be addressed

in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed

rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.

Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at

this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that

this action will be effective on July 3, 1995.

Final Action

EPA is approving the District of Columbia's October 24, 1994

submittal consisting of a permit-to-operate for GSA's Central and West

Heating Plants as a revision to the District of Columbia SIP.

Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or

allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for

revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to

the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light

of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in

[[Page 21455]] relation to relevant statutory and regulatory

requirements.

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA

must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of

any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.

Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small

entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,

and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than

50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the

Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve

requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the

Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the

Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on

any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the

Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility

analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base

its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S.

EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature

by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the

Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by

an October 4, 1993 memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant

Administrator for Air and Radiation. The OMB has exempted this

regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for

judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 3, 1995. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule to

approve the permit-to-operate issued to GSA for its Central and West

Heating Plants as a revision to the District of Columbia SIP does not

affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review

nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review

may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or

action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,

Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

Dated: March 21, 1995.

Stanley L. Laskowski,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Subpart J--District of Columbia

2. Section 52.470 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(33) to read as

follows:

Sec. 52.470 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(33) Permit-to-operate issued by the District of Columbia to

General Services Administration for its Central and West Heating Plants

submitted on October 24, 1994 by the Environmental Regulation

Administration:

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) Letter of October 24, 1994 from the Environmental Regulation

Administration transmitting a permit-to-operate issued by the District

of Columbia to GSA for its Central and West Heating Plants.

(B) September 8, 1994 permit-to-operate issued by the District of

Columbia to GSA for its Central and West Heating Plants requiring the

combustion of natural gas and establishing annual and short-term

emission limits for SO2, NOX, PM-10, VOCs, and CO. The permit

was effective upon its issuance.

(ii) Additional material.

(A) Remainder of the District of Columbia's October 24, 1994

submittal.

[FR Doc. 95-10706 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.