Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.03s
Record and brief — Thompson v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1985
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 4.
469 U.S. 17Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Life Settlement Corp. v. Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
Ct. __, 2010 WL 2518518, *9 (June 24, 2010) (citations omitted; emphasis added). … (A-399, 428, 473, 509) (Emphasis added.)
562 U.S. 962Petition for Writ of Certiorari — California v. Carney
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
Wiga (9th Cir. 1981) 662 F.2d 1325 24 United States v. … Rodgers (Sth Cir. 1971) 442 F.24 902, 904, (search of camper).)
471 U.S. 386Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Garner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
The order was stayed until Apml 24, 1972, so that petitioner could apply to the Court of Appeals for relief. a 3. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 (1970) ).
416 U.S. 935Amicus Curiae Brief — Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Gizoni
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Engerrand and Bale, Seaman Status Reconsidered, 24 S.Tex. L.J. 431 (1983). … BULL, III One Embarcadero Center, Suite 3550 San Francisco, California 94411 Telephone: (415) 399-9191 ny Chin HL Madu EILEEN R.
502 U.S. 81Opposition — BARRY v. NEW YORK (Nos. 83-485, 83-484)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Walsh, 336 A. 2d 97 (Ct. of Appeals, Md., 1975), app. dism'd 424 U.S. 901 (1976) ++++++rrs> 24, 35 Nixon v. … Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977) see errr eee ee secens 24, 34, 36 Zablocki v.
Reply Brief — Group W. Cable, Inc. v. Florida Power Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
Power Br. at 24; see Tampa Elec. Br. at 21-22. … Power Br. at 24-25 & n.19.
476 U.S. 1156Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dwayne K. Taylor, Petitioner v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 16, 2024
Janik, 127 111. 2d 390, 399, 537 N.E.2d 756, 760 (1989). … Under section 24-1.7(a) of the Criminal Code (720 ILCS 5/24-1.7(a) (West 2014)), defendant is guilty of the Class X felony of armed habitual criminal based on his possession of a firearm after twice being
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2022
Jan. 24, 2022). The recent decision by the three-judge U.S. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) and Cooper v. Harris, 137 S. Ct. 1455 (2017). A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2022
Jan. 24, 2022). The recent decision by the three-judge U.S. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) and Cooper v. Harris, 137 S. Ct. 1455 (2017). A.
Amicus Curiae Brief — David Lesh, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 16, 2025
No. 24-654 In the Supreme Court of the United States DAVID LESH, v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES, Respondent. … King, Juries, Democracy, and Petty Crime, 24 U. PA. J. CONST.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joshua Adam Schulte, Petitioner v. D. Baysore, Warden, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 23, 2025
United States Federal BOP, 24-CV-332.3 II. A. … Document 63 Filed 09/04/24 Page 10 of 11 PagelD #: 1335 E.g., Richardson v. McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 403 (1997).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Union Railroad v. Imm (No. 249)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1961
United States, 354 U.S. 394, 399 (1957) .. Commiasioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. ee og Se dy a's dé wicea 8-6 » First Employer's Liability Case, 207 U.S. 463 (1908) Healy v. … S. 394, 399 '1957:; Commissioner of In- ternal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U. S. 87, 94 (1939).
Brief for the United States — United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1922
Bowery Sa Bank, 47 Hun. 399; 14 N. V. 8. 515; 84 N. V. 399; 4 L. R. … Bowery Savings Bank, 47 Hun 399; II N. F. S. 515; 54 NV. F. 399, 4 L. R. A. 145. Wheeler v. Dunn, 13 Colo. 428; 22 Pac. 827. Avila v. Manhattan Chemical Co., 32 Hun. 1. Holt Mfg. Co. v.
260 U.S. 290Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Asherman v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
Brown, 48 N.Y. 2d 388, 399 < ae 8 Fee ee 26 People v. Dodsworth, 60 I11l.App. 3d 207, 17 111.Dec. 450, 376 N.E. 2d a ee. | ee ree 46 People v. … , §1800 (Chadbourne A, a rrrrry Tree TTT Te 24 6 Wigmore, Evidence, §1802 (Chadbourne Bs SUPE 66 64660.664600666 Cebb OCR ASOS 24 -viii- No. 84- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STEVEN
470 U.S. 1050Jurisdictional Statement — Roe v. Norton
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1975
Rodriqueg 20 | 36 LEG 24 16 (1973) . … Harder 310 F, Supp. 302 (1970), appeal dismissed | 399 Y.
422 U.S. 391Opposition Brief — Wallshein v. Cablestrand Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
Here there was no revision whatsoever of the first CAFC judgment of March 8, 1993 in the second CAFC judgment of May 24, 1994. … Meyers, 94 U.S. 399, 49 L. Ed. 110, 25 S. Ct. 697; and Gaddis v. Calgon Corp., 506 F. 2d 880, 184 USPQ 449 (CA 5).
513 U.S. 1126Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019
Ct. 2211 (2017)......................................... 24 League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ....................................... 14, 15 Lucas v. Forty-Fourth Gen. … Fox Dep. 29:24–30:2, 30:16–21, ECF No. 101-4, Mar. 22, 2017.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1950
C. 166, 99 F. (2d) 399......... 18 Philadelphia Co. v. Securities and Exc e Commis- ont, TO6 TD GOD sink 8 icc cine enecenees 8,9,19 Philadelphia Co. v. … In the Philadelphia case (164 F. 2nd 889), a review was sought under Section 24(a) of the Holding Company Act, 15 U. S. OC. Section 79x(a).
340 U.S. 827Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 1, 2022
Perry (“LULAC”), 548 U.S. 399, 415 (2006). … Jan. 24, 2022) (three-judge court).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.