Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Term Extension Act of 1995: Hearing on S. 483 before the Senate Judiciary Comm. … As one commentator aptly put it: “Since when did unauthorized taking . . . become ‘sharing?’ . . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Learning Resources, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2025

It is also the understanding reflected in the Tariff Act of 1789— signed by George Washington—and this Court’s precedents. … (cleaned up) (emphasis added). 17 C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Turnbow

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983). 3 sion of the trial court, accepted both of the claimant’s arguments. … Congress acted to promote the “uniformity of decision” necessary “4 See also A-T-O, Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019

Supp. 2d 343, 351 (D.D.C. 2007), the court held that guidelines limiting the time periods for which the government could seek to recover royalties from mineral lessees constituted a reviewable general … See Air Courier Conf. of Am. v. Am. Postal Workers Union, 498 U.S. 517, 523 n.3 (1991). 22 Respectfully submitted, SCOTT L. NELSON Counsel of Record ALLISON M.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Daniel Grand, Petitioner v. City of University Heights, Ohio, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 8, 2026

Moreover, “[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Cuomo, 592 U.S. at 19 (quoting Elrod v. … Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560–61 (1992) (emphasis added) (cleaned up). All three Lujan elements are present here.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mark E. Schell, Petitioner v. Richard Darby, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 10, 2021

This case provides a clean, simple vehicle to make these clarifications ..................................................... 15 CONCLUSION ............................................................. … McCoski, JUDGES IN STREET CLOTHES: ACTING ETHICALLY OFF-THE-BENCH 101-03 (Fairleigh Dickinson U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (No. 06-466)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

It encourages public notice and comment on those standards, id., and has acted to update them since the attacks of Sep- tember 11, 2001, see Part III.B. … Accord- ingly, they allow for even more public participation than no- tice-and-comment rulemakings.

Amicus Curiae Brief — James E. Snyder, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 9, 2024

This Court has periodically applied the logic of freedom of association to the lowest echelon of the 13 federal system: municipal government. See Elrod v. … Because of this long-standing caution, this Court has rejected broad interpretations of the Travel Act, the federal mail fraud statute, and the Hobbs Act, that resemble the broad scope of Section 666 wrongly

Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Devillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2023

San Diego, 450 U.S. 621 (1981) ............................................... 8 Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. … Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 267 (1946); and Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Frank Thompson, Petitioner v. Carl Wilson, Commissioner, Maine Department of Marine Resources

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2026

These include, for example, Clean Water Act permitting requirements under which a farmer may face enormous penalties for normal farming activities,2 farm labor laws under which agencies seek to facilitate … Maine cannot escape Silverman’s rule by observing that its GPS device is small, or that it transmits only periodically. 13 Size and frequency do not matter; physical invasion does.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025

The Copyright Act does not explicitly define the scope of secondary liability. Restatement of the Law, Copyright, Tentative Draft No. 5 § 8.01, Comment a. … Restatement of the Law, Copyright, Tentative Draft No. 5 § 8.01, Comment c; Cf. Venegas-Hernández v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA USA Inc. v. Bo Boeken (Nos. 05-594, 05-600)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The Labeling Act is one such statute. … Witty v.Delta Air Lines, Inc., 366 F.3d 380 (Sth Cir. 2004); In re Deep Vein Thrombosis Litigation, 2005 U.S. 12 Dist. LEXIS 4043 (N.D. Cal. 2005).

Amicus Curiae Brief — McDermott, Inc. v. Capital Welding & Fabrication, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

from: (1) Bodily injury or death to persons arising out of or resulting from radioactivity; or (2) Bodily injury or death to persons arising out of or resulting from the retainment of oil spills and clean-up … arena is not only necessary, but has been invited by justices in the Fifth Circuit.2 2 The confusion and unpredictability of litigation in this area is made abun- dantly clear by the numerous recent comments

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

If a patient cannot breathe, air is pumped in through a respirator; if a patient cannot swallow, fluids and nutrition are pumped in through a surgically implanted tube. … Furthermore, [ijn deciding whether the administration of potentially life- prolonging medical treatment is in the best interest of the patient who is incompetent to act in his behalf, the physician

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2022

Air Cargo v. U.S. Postal Serv., 674 F.3d 852, 861 (D.C. Cir. 2012). … Air Cargo, 674 F.3d at 861.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

NGM... . 2 ccc cece Ky Statement on Signing the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, 28 Weekly Comp. Pres. … As former diplomats and State Department offi- cials with collectively broad and diverse experi- ence, amici are uniquely suited to comment on whether lawsuits in the United.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Krivacska v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

, and these false claims often persisted in subsequent interviews over a 3-month period (Ornstein, Gordon, & Larus, 1992). … Thereafter, the children in the test condition were given four suggestive interviews over a period of ten weeks.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randy Johnson, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 23, 2018

McFadden, Whitman Fires Police Chief Over Comments on Race, N.Y. … Indeed, 7 African-American men were stopped more than 30 times during this period.36 Rather than being the result of any difference in criminal activity between African Americans and whites, the report

Amicus Curiae Brief — Boureslan v. Arabian American American American Oil Co. (Nos. 89-1845, 89-1838)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

Sabena, Belgian World Air- lines, 731 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1984) 8 Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 (1953) 19 McCulloch v. … The “practice of states” includes “diplomatic acts and instructions as well as public measures and other govern- mental acts and official statements of policy... .” IJd., comment b, at 25.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jennings v. Rodriguez, 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1204)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Kim ee SN MN airs ev ckiiccsaniedoccebens Scebabis Foucha v. Louisiana 604 U.S. 71 (1992)................ Wabiataiisaetiios INS v. … See Salerno 481 U.S. at 747 (pretrial detention permissible in part because of “stringent time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act”); Demore v.