Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.53s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Therefore, by policy, Santa Fe has carved out a period of time for private speech by individual students. … This Court also said in Widmar: But by creating a forum the University does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired there.
530 U.S. 290Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 23, 2018
In addition, notwithstanding that technical medical issues may well underlie this Court’s ultimate decision, the AMA declines to comment on those issues or to advocate for either party as to which method … They force the public to confront the enormity of the act. What people much prefer is a way to accomplish the deed while believing there is something humane about it.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2025
Common Cause, 588 U.S. 684, 704 (2019) (cleaned up). Worse still, it will require race-based actions by States and courts with “no end … in sight.” SFFA v. Harvard, 600 U.S. 181, 213 (2023). … EPA, 598 U.S. 651, 680 (2023) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA USA Inc. v. Bo Boeken (Nos. 05-594, 05-600)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
The Labeling Act is one such statute. … Witty v.Delta Air Lines, Inc., 366 F.3d 380 (Sth Cir. 2004); In re Deep Vein Thrombosis Litigation, 2005 U.S. 12 Dist. LEXIS 4043 (N.D. Cal. 2005).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 360 (2018) (No. 17-1702)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Cir. 2013): “In the two decades since Congress enacted the Cable Act of 1992, the video programming marketplace has radically transformed. … FCC, 520 U.S. 180 (1997), that “it is rare for |cable subscribers] ever to switch” from cable to over-the-air broadcast television, id. at 220 (quoting S. Rep.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, certiorari denied, 400 he, eee 32 Drachman v. Harvey, 453 F.2d 722, re- versed on rehéaring en bane, 453 F.2d 736 . Z _ 31-32 Eason v. … Fraud— SEC Rule 10b-5, Sec. 7.6(1), p. 190.21 _ (1973) 11 Comment, Inroads o on 1 the Necessity for a a Consummated Purchase or Sale under Rule 10b-5, 1969 Duke LJ. 349 TOGO) ce 23 Comment, The
421 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Franklin Nat. Bank of Franklin Square v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1954
Section 24 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended (38 Stat. 273, 12 USC § 371), expressly authorized national banks **to receive time and savings deposits” and Section 24(7) of the National Bank Act … Commonwealth of Virginia, 253 U.S. 412, 415; Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day, 266 U.S. 71, 85.
347 U.S. 373Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 31, 2020
Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 (2001) (quoting Dep’t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976)). … Endangered Species Act, 112 6 See H.R.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Muehler v. Mena
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
::scsseceeseeneeeeeeeees Ellen Baker, Comment, Flying While Arab - Racial Profiling and Air Travel Security, 67 J. Air L. & Coan. … Rev. 265 (1999); Ellen Baker, Comment, Flying While Arab - Racial Profil- ing and Air Travel Security, 67 J.
544 U.S. 93Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605, 607 (1950). … Patent Act of 1836, ch. 357, § 6, 5 Stat. 117, 119 (1836).
520 U.S. 17Amicus Curiae Brief — McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (Nos. 06-970, 06-969)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
CONSTITUTION IE 3565p -0d 3 4seoee ded nes cewasnnes 1, passim STATUTES Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. … The district court essentially agreed, finding that the ads did “not mention an election, a candidacy, or a political party, nor ... comment on a candidate's character, actions, or fitness for office
Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
CONSTITUTION Es 5 irk os. beeuinen 64d wks seat 1, passim STATUTES Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. … The district court essentially agreed, finding that the ads did “not mention an election, a candidacy, or a political party, nor ... comment on a candidate’s character, actions, or fitness for office
551 U.S. 449Amicus Curiae Brief — Google LLC, Petitioner v. Oracle America, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 13, 2020
Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880) [Record].6 Because the relevant information was spread out over multiple volumes, it was difficult to prepare a balance sheet for each period and to detect errors or fraud. … A clean distinction is also possible here.
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Boerne v. Flores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
the facts in this record and by the story referred to above about the intention of a pros- ecutor to use a sacramental confession in a homicide case, the kinds of harms we have experienced in this period … This 13 case affords the Court a clean record and a clear oppor- tunity to signal to the Nation that it meant what it said when it sent the religious communities to the legislative branch to secure
521 U.S. 507Amicus Curiae Brief — Ricci v. DeStefano (No. 08-328)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Delta Air Lines, Inc., ae as gee cle eel 4,10 Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss., Ne i ee 2 a a a a ee eee 1 Texas Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 103 n.24 (1983) (finding state fair employment laws were not preempted by Title VII).
Amicus Curiae Brief — James E. Snyder, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 9, 2024
This Court has periodically applied the logic of freedom of association to the lowest echelon of the 13 federal system: municipal government. See Elrod v. … Because of this long-standing caution, this Court has rejected broad interpretations of the Travel Act, the federal mail fraud statute, and the Hobbs Act, that resemble the broad scope of Section 666 wrongly
Amicus Curiae Brief — Randy Johnson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 23, 2018
McFadden, Whitman Fires Police Chief Over Comments on Race, N.Y. … Indeed, 7 African-American men were stopped more than 30 times during this period.36 Rather than being the result of any difference in criminal activity between African Americans and whites, the report
Amicus Curiae Brief — Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
The CDA Acts As A Virtual Ban On Adult-To-Adult Communication of “Indecent” And “Patently Offensive” D. … Whenever I get my period (and that’s only been three times), I have the feeling that in spite of all the pain, discomfort and mess, I'm carrying around a sweet secret.
521 U.S. 844Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983)."" … Such review must “take[] into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the claimant relating to the claim.” 29 C.F.R. 2560.503-l(h)(2)(iv).
542 U.S. 200Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983)."" … Such review must “take[] into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the claimant relating to the claim.” 29 C.F.R. 2560.503-l(h\(2)(iv).
540 U.S. 981
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.