Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.53s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    Therefore, by policy, Santa Fe has carved out a period of time for private speech by individual students. … This Court also said in Widmar: But by creating a forum the University does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired there.

    530 U.S. 290
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Russell Bucklew, Petitioner v. Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 23, 2018

    In addition, notwithstanding that technical medical issues may well underlie this Court’s ultimate decision, the AMA declines to comment on those issues or to advocate for either party as to which method … They force the public to confront the enormity of the act. What people much prefer is a way to accomplish the deed while believing there is something humane about it.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2025

    Common Cause, 588 U.S. 684, 704 (2019) (cleaned up). Worse still, it will require race-based actions by States and courts with “no end … in sight.” SFFA v. Harvard, 600 U.S. 181, 213 (2023). … EPA, 598 U.S. 651, 680 (2023) (cleaned up).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA USA Inc. v. Bo Boeken (Nos. 05-594, 05-600)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    The Labeling Act is one such statute. … Witty v.Delta Air Lines, Inc., 366 F.3d 380 (Sth Cir. 2004); In re Deep Vein Thrombosis Litigation, 2005 U.S. 12 Dist. LEXIS 4043 (N.D. Cal. 2005).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 360 (2018) (No. 17-1702)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Cir. 2013): “In the two decades since Congress enacted the Cable Act of 1992, the video programming marketplace has radically transformed. … FCC, 520 U.S. 180 (1997), that “it is rare for |cable subscribers] ever to switch” from cable to over-the-air broadcast television, id. at 220 (quoting S. Rep.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, certiorari denied, 400 he, eee 32 Drachman v. Harvey, 453 F.2d 722, re- versed on rehéaring en bane, 453 F.2d 736 . Z _ 31-32 Eason v. … Fraud— SEC Rule 10b-5, Sec. 7.6(1), p. 190.21 _ (1973) 11 Comment, Inroads o on 1 the Necessity for a a Consummated Purchase or Sale under Rule 10b-5, 1969 Duke LJ. 349 TOGO) ce 23 Comment, The

    421 U.S. 723
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Franklin Nat. Bank of Franklin Square v. New York

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1954

    Section 24 of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended (38 Stat. 273, 12 USC § 371), expressly authorized national banks **to receive time and savings deposits” and Section 24(7) of the National Bank Act … Commonwealth of Virginia, 253 U.S. 412, 415; Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day, 266 U.S. 71, 85.

    347 U.S. 373
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al., Petitioners v. Sierra Club, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 31, 2020

    Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 (2001) (quoting Dep’t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976)). … Endangered Species Act, 112 6 See H.R.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Muehler v. Mena

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    ::scsseceeseeneeeeeeeees Ellen Baker, Comment, Flying While Arab - Racial Profiling and Air Travel Security, 67 J. Air L. & Coan. … Rev. 265 (1999); Ellen Baker, Comment, Flying While Arab - Racial Profil- ing and Air Travel Security, 67 J.

    544 U.S. 93
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605, 607 (1950). … Patent Act of 1836, ch. 357, § 6, 5 Stat. 117, 119 (1836).

    520 U.S. 17
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (Nos. 06-970, 06-969)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    CONSTITUTION IE 3565p -0d 3 4seoee ded nes cewasnnes 1, passim STATUTES Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. … The district court essentially agreed, finding that the ads did “not mention an election, a candidacy, or a political party, nor ... comment on a candidate's character, actions, or fitness for office

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    CONSTITUTION Es 5 irk os. beeuinen 64d wks seat 1, passim STATUTES Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. … The district court essentially agreed, finding that the ads did “not mention an election, a candidacy, or a political party, nor ... comment on a candidate’s character, actions, or fitness for office

    551 U.S. 449
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Google LLC, Petitioner v. Oracle America, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 13, 2020

    Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880) [Record].6 Because the relevant information was spread out over multiple volumes, it was difficult to prepare a balance sheet for each period and to detect errors or fraud. … A clean distinction is also possible here.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Boerne v. Flores

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    the facts in this record and by the story referred to above about the intention of a pros- ecutor to use a sacramental confession in a homicide case, the kinds of harms we have experienced in this period … This 13 case affords the Court a clean record and a clear oppor- tunity to signal to the Nation that it meant what it said when it sent the religious communities to the legislative branch to secure

    521 U.S. 507
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Ricci v. DeStefano (No. 08-328)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., ae as gee cle eel 4,10 Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss., Ne i ee 2 a a a a ee eee 1 Texas Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 103 n.24 (1983) (finding state fair employment laws were not preempted by Title VII).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — James E. Snyder, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 9, 2024

    This Court has periodically applied the logic of freedom of association to the lowest echelon of the 13 federal system: municipal government. See Elrod v. … Because of this long-standing caution, this Court has rejected broad interpretations of the Travel Act, the federal mail fraud statute, and the Hobbs Act, that resemble the broad scope of Section 666 wrongly

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Randy Johnson, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 23, 2018

    McFadden, Whitman Fires Police Chief Over Comments on Race, N.Y. … Indeed, 7 African-American men were stopped more than 30 times during this period.36 Rather than being the result of any difference in criminal activity between African Americans and whites, the report

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    The CDA Acts As A Virtual Ban On Adult-To-Adult Communication of “Indecent” And “Patently Offensive” D. … Whenever I get my period (and that’s only been three times), I have the feeling that in spite of all the pain, discomfort and mess, I'm carrying around a sweet secret.

    521 U.S. 844
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983)."" … Such review must “take[] into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the claimant relating to the claim.” 29 C.F.R. 2560.503-l(h)(2)(iv).

    542 U.S. 200
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983)."" … Such review must “take[] into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the claimant relating to the claim.” 29 C.F.R. 2560.503-l(h\(2)(iv).

    540 U.S. 981

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.